Not with women then

Sigh.

Meaning what? It’s singling out, and targeting, and harming people who claim to be the other sex to prevent male people from taking women’s sports and prizes and jobs?

No. Of course it’s not. Men remain men however they idennify, and they don’t get to take women’s sports and prizes and jobs.

It’s the biggest con job in the world to convince women that we should be cheering on men who are determined to take women’s sports and prizes and jobs.

Comments

4 responses to “Not with women then”

  1. Colin Day Avatar

    You’re not spreading your cerebral cortices for just anyone?

  2. Holms Avatar

    Singling out …male people? That’s 50% of the population, and the dominant half no less.

  3. twiliter Avatar

    Good old Senator (she/her). I wonder if Vice President (she/her) and Senator (she/her) are just that pig ignorant. Are they simply opposing the more conservative (and more reasonable on this issue) politicos who understand how trans “rights” erode women’s rights? Politics aside (well never say never), the biological realities fail to sink in for these ideologues. Progressive is fine, lets have progress, but letting men take over women only endeavors is just the opposite, it’s regression into the old days when the Olympics were men only (and naked) with women subjugated to the grandstands. Regress identifying as progress, it’s a whole thing. Identifying as something it’s not is all the rage.

  4. iknklast Avatar

    twiliter, perhaps if the Olympics were naked again, people could see just what was going on.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *