Pro tip: you don’t get to change the wording to make your assertion retroactively not libelous. That’s not how it works. At all.
The word was “denial”. Not “revisionism”; denial.
If somebody claims that Auschwitz was located in Times Square or Piccadilly Circus, we’re allowed to say no it wasn’t. Just fyi.
The Nazis killed people who thought they were transgender. By modern counts, they probably killed more than actually existed at the time, thanks to posthumous transing. The Nazis killed even more Mormons, as the Mormons have “posthumously baptized” a lot of Jews, which seems similar to posthumous transing. Some might even count in all three columns.
Did the Nazis target “trans people” first, though, is the question. No. First they targeted political opponents, before even the Jews. There’s nothing revisionist about saying that.
It’s probably another of those claims where they steal stats from gays. There is evidence that Nazis targeted gay people; hence, they targeted trans. If you claim *LGBTQI++++++++* as a ‘community’, and they killed gays and lesbians, obviously trans were targeted. Then just sort of forget the L and the G, who were targeted, and once more you can be trans, trans, trans all the time. Like, ALL the time.
Leave a Reply