Author: Ophelia Benson

  • A thoroughly disreputable approach

    Oh honestly. Bad scientists, no cookie.

    The editor of a science journal has resigned after admitting that a recent paper
    casting doubt on man-made climate change should not have been published.

    The paper was outside the journal’s field.

    Publishing in “off-topic” journals is generally frowned on in scientific
    circles, partly because editors may lack the specialist knowledge and contacts
    needed to run a thorough peer review process.

    “The problem is that comparable studies published by other authors have already been refuted…, a fact which was ignored by Spencer and Braswell in their paper and, unfortunately, not picked up by the reviewers.

    “In other words, the problem I see with the paper… is not that it declared
    a minority view (which was later unfortunately much exaggerated by the public
    media) but that it essentially ignored the scientific arguments of its
    opponents.

    “This latter point was missed in the review process, explaining why I
    perceive this paper to be fundamentally flawed and therefore wrongly accepted by the journal.”

    Mr Ward described the tactic of publishing in off-topic journals as a
    “classic tactic” of scientists dismissive of man-made climate change.

    “Those who recognise that their ideas are weak but seek to get them into the
    literature by finding weaknesses in the peer review system are taking a
    thoroughly disreputable approach,” he said.

    How tacky is that?! They ignored the scientific arguments of their opponents and they submitted the article to an off-topic journal. Tacky tacky tacky – and the editor is falling on his sword.

    Note the caption under the conspicuous picture of one of the authors.

    Dr Spencer is a committed Christian as well as a professional scientist.

    Zap. For once the BBC connects the dots.

  • Elsie Dinsmore

    Ever read any Elsie Dinsmore books? No, neither have I. I know the name, because it’s a byword for slushy pious Victorian dogoodery, though I don’t remember where – Little Women? Which is no slouch in the slushy pious Victorian dogoodery department itself, so maybe not. Mark Twain? Possibly.

    They’re now big with the Incredibly Christian set. Rethinking Vision Forum is not impressed. But the part I really liked is from a comment there. The commenter read the first Elsie when she was a child and asked her mother what she thought of it.

    “What a wet blanket.  That girl did nothing but cry all the time.  I think every page her eyes filled with tears and her tiny chest heaved with sobs.”  She started to laugh.  “Her tiny chest HEAVED with SOBS!”

    I love her. My tiny chest HEAVED with LAUGHTER.

  • He taught me critical thinking

    Another escapee is Libby Anne. She gives a ten-part account of being a good child of Patriarchy and then of being turned around.

    The childhood is by no means all horrible, even seen from the outside. Much of it is quite appealing.

    I also enjoyed gardening. We always had large gardens, and we children did a great deal of the tending and weeding, sometimes waking at dawn in the summer months to weed before the summer heat. In addition to learning to garden, I found books at a homeschool convention about edible plants and medicinal herbs and set out to teach myself these important skills. I learned that dandelions could be eaten in salads, that plantain was good for mosquito bites, and that raspberry leaves made an excellent tea for pregnant women (such as my mother). I even tried to make flour out of clover. I loved walking through marshy areas or abandoned lots looking for plants that matched the pictures in my books, becoming excited at each new find. I knew that a proper wife should be able to forage for food and prepare herbal remedies, especially if the government collapsed and the country descended into anarchy as we always feared it would.

    The proper wife bit and the descent into anarchy bit are a downer, but then that’s apparently what it was like: a mix of patriarchal doctrine and pleasantly industrious rural life.

    But the patriarchal doctrine had some thorns even then.

    My mother was constantly reading books like Me? Obey Him? as she strove to be a better, more submissive wife. This was difficult for my mother, for she was a very strong woman. I watched her war with herself as she tried to reconcile her strong spirit with the submission she believed in so steadfastly. I watched her cry over it, watched it eat away at her. My father, usually a reasonable man, became quite upset with my mother if he felt she was infringing on his authority. His most common response was to give her the silent treatment, and that was enough. In response, my mother generally first felt indignation and then blamed herself for not submitting enough and resolved again and again to do better. While my parents loved each other dearly, this tension added strain to their relationship, and I could see it.

    The sad thing is that it’s an artificial strain, a worked up strain. A reasonable man has no need to think he has an authority that his wife shouldn’t infringe on. If both had thought of each other as partners and equals, they would still have disagreed about things, but without doctrinal anger or resentment or guilt. Nonsense about authority and submission is an extra element. It’s truly sad that people mess themselves up this way. It’s a disaster that they teach their children to do the same.

    In addition to teaching me about theology, politics, and current events, my father taught me to think. He taught me critical thinking, and told me never to believe something just because someone says it, but to always question everything and follow truth wherever it leads. He taught me to never trust authority for authority’s sake and to never be afraid of truth. He taught me logic and how to recognize logical fallacies. Of course, the context of all this was learning to rebut worldly ideas and bogus concepts like global warming and evolution.

    Not patriarchy or submission or god.

    But then Libby Anne went to college…and as so often happens, the doors opened.

    I began to have theological and political conversations with a number of non-Christians. I worked hard to show them the perfection of the Bible, the evidence of young earth creationism, the evils of abortion, and the love of God.

    Strangely, I found a surprising number of my arguments rebutted by arguments I had never heard before. I was told that there were serious problems with creationism, ethical issues with the Bible, and more affective ways to decrease abortion than banning it. I turned to my resources, my books and websites on creationism, theology, and conservative politics, and I tried again. And again. And again. But some things just didn’t add up. I paused my arguments to do some serious research, and I was astounded by what I found.

    An open door.

     

  • Eric MacDonald on women’s rights all over again

    The case for women’s freedom must be made again and again, until the religious disease is cured; so long as religion is present on the political stage, every freedom we enjoy is in danger.

  • Religious rules do not trump child protection laws

    The Irish justice minister had to reiterate this in response to Cardinal Sean Brady’s fuss about the “sacred and treasured” rite of confession.

  • Christians outraged over BC and AD v BCE and CE

    Baby Jesus is hurt that Australian high school text books will no longer use his name in dates.

  • Sarah Posner and Anthea Butler on the new Pentecostalism

    If journalists want to understand the religious right movement, they must pay attention to diversity among evangelicals, Pentecostals, and non-denominational churches.

  • My faith dispels any doubts

    And by the way three cheers for female genital mutilation.

    …some communities see the practice as an integral part of their culture. “I have two daughters and five nieces, all circumcised by doctors. I do not consider it a human rights violation because, according to our religious teachings, it has been divinely ordained. My faith dispels any doubts that some might put in my mind,” says Shaheen Abdullah.

    Good old god! “He” designed us the way we are and then ordained that the females of us have to have our genitals chopped off. Why not just not include the genitals in the original package then? Why construct the thing only to ordain that it should be carved up and peeled away and stitched closed?

    Human rights v divinely ordained – that’s what it keeps coming down to, time after time. “Divinely ordained” turns a stupid, brutal,  destructive mutilation into a good thing and “an integral part of their culture.” A pox on “divinely ordained.”

  • Get out

    One woman escaped the “Quiverfull” nightmare. First she entered the trap –

    I remarried, found a “bible-believing” church, and worked hard
    within the Quiverfull counterculture to implement the best of the best biblical
    family values into our home life.  I had six more children. I homebirthed,
    homeschooled, and home-churched. I submitted to my husband and joyfully
    sacrificed my time, energy and talents to build him up and help him to succeed.
    I published a “pro-life, pro-family” Christian family newspaper to inform and
    encourage other Christians to defend “Traditional Family Values.”

    In 2003, we were honored as Family of the Year at the Nebraska Family
    Council’s “Salt & Light” awards.

    Then she noticed how bad it was –

    …perpetual pregnancies destroyed my health, and my indiscriminate acquiescence to my husband’s every whim transformed him from a loving father into a tantrum-throwing tyrant. Burnout and disillusionment led to abuse, neglect, family disintegration and a particularly nasty divorce.

    And then she got out, and stopped quivering.

     

  • One woman who escaped the “quiverfull” nightmare

    “Perpetual pregnancies destroyed my health, and my indiscriminate acquiescence to my husband’s every whim transformed him from a loving father into a tantrum-throwing tyrant.”

  • God said let there be FGM

    “I do not consider it a human rights violation because, according to our religious teachings, it has been divinely ordained.”

  • Stop the deportation of Mitra Kahrom to Iran

    She fled to Sweden and has been openly and vocally active in organizations that oppose the Islamic Republic regime.

  • Legal firm helps women accused of witchcraft

    It is often the widows, or the older, poorer or disabled women and those unprotected by male relatives who are most vulnerable to witchcraft accusations in Burkina Fasso.

  • The history of dissident thought

    It’s embarrassing and shocking that Michele Bachmann can be a serious candidate for president. The same goes for Rick Perry; the same goes for Mitt Romney; the same goes for Sarah Palin. Susan Jacoby thinks Americans’ ignorance of our history of secularism is part of the problem.

     I am less concerned about whether the American public is unacquainted with secular philosophy than I am about its vast ignorance of the founders’ determination not to establish a Christian government. College courses cannot fill the empty space left by public elementary and secondary schooling in which secularism is considered a dirty word instead of an honorable part of American history.

    If Americans were not in dire need of remedial education on this subject, Texas Gov. Rick Perry would be automatically disqualified as a presidential candidate because of his unabashed contempt for the constitutional prohibitions against any government favoritism toward religion.

    …One of the great victories of the religious right since 1980 has been its ability to convince a significant proportion of Americans that public education is dominated by secular values and a secular interpretation of history, when the truth is that many local school officials and teachers are terrified of saying or teaching anything that contradicts conventional wisdom about religion as the foundation and essence of the American nation.

    Almost everyone who does any kind of talking-in-public is terrified of saying anything that contradicts conventional wisdom about religion as the best thing evah. Teachers and school officials of course are triply or quadruply so, because they’re public servants, because they have power over the vulnerable young, because they have parents to deal with. The result is a vast rustling forest of taboos, and the result of that is ignorance and distortion.

    What is needed is integration of knowledge about freethought and secularism at every level of public schooling, so that American students may begin, not end, their college education with a basic grounding in the history of dissident thought that has always been the engine of human progress.

    It’s odd the way Americans combine a certain respect or affection for dissident thought with a passion for the most obedient kind of thought there is.

  • Susan Jacoby on secular studies in America

    The American public is shockingly ignorant of the founders’ determination not to establish a Christian government.

  • AI worried about arrests of blacks in Tripoli

    The rebels claim Gadhafi’s forces are stocked with mercenaries from various African nations, but there is growing concern skin colour is all the proof some rebels need.

  • Elizabeth Farrelly on Maryam Namazie in Sydney

    The thinking classes’ timid silence on Islamism cedes the critical ground to the  far right, allowing Islamists to cry Islamophobia and render themselves immune.

  • No more tiptoe

    An atheist comes out as an atheist. In Kentucky.

    I have often tiptoed around stating my lack of religious beliefs because, like
    many people in a minority, I fear being shunned and judged. I’ve described
    myself with words like non-religious, humanist, and freethinker and have most recently been playing with the “Unitarian” label. But as my kids get older, I don’t want them thinking there is anything wrong with me saying exactly what I am, in terms of my personal religious faith: an atheist. There, I said it. I am an atheist. I AM AN ATHEIST!

    Hey Leanna. There are lots of us out here.

     

  • He knew what God wanted, and what men wanted

    Woho, looky here – the opposition looks at Vision Forum.

    A former stay-at-home-daughter and now stay-at-home wife and mommy says she wishes she’d gone to college.

    All of these books taught that the world was a very dangerous place for a woman. God had designed her to be at home, creating a peaceful haven for her husband and children. The books said that any girl who left her father’s protection and went out into the world to get an education or job would end up sad and alone, because she was not living the life God willed for her.

    God wanted us to dare to live differently. His plan for women involved getting back to the family principles the home was founded on. Girls needed to be brought up knowing instinctively how to care for babies and keep house. They needed to be taught to be quiet, submissive, and modest and pure. The only way to do this, was to keep separate from the world. So my parent homeschooled and kept me from doing much of anything outside of our family circle, so that I would never get used to experiences outside the home, and I would learn to be content in my homemaking role.

    It sounded so romantic when I was ages 10-13. I was going to be amazing someday! My husband was going to be pleased that I was so good at caring for children and keeping house. I was practicing submission to my father, taking it very seriously whenever he pointed out some behaviour of mine that “would infuriate my husband someday.” He knew what God wanted, and what men wanted. If I wanted to be successful and happy someday, I had to start by pleasing my Daddy.

    In other words…….it’s just what it always sounded like: a scheme for making men happy. (It seems like a radically flawed scheme, to me, because the price of all that obedience and submission is living with an idiot. I would think an adult companion, however independent, would be immeasurably better than a kind of animated doll. But the patriarchs don’t seem to see it that way.)

    So it’s a scheme for making men happy by training girls to be slaves to the men they marry. It’s a sick little system for obliterating women so that men can use them in any way they feel like.

    Sometimes I wished that I had the chance to study more than just cooking, cleaning and sewing, and I did ask my parents if I could take some classes while living at home, but I was reminded that it would only be a waste of time and money to go to college when none of that education would apply in the home. A college atmosphere could take my focus off the Lord, and fill my head with thoughts of career and rebellion. After some begging on my part, Dad said he would permit me to take a few online courses from a very conservative school if I insisted, but it was clear that this was not what he felt was wise. He also said that I had to finish all my high school material first, and that my school work could in no way interfere with my household duties. I was so overwhelmed at the thought of trying to keep both my father and a school happy, that I gave up on the idea of further education.

    “Dad” would be a credit to the Taliban.

  • Frankly, people do think you’re a nutter

    Christina Patterson doesn’t share Tony Blair’s affection for injecting “faith” into politics.

    You might think that someone who doesn’t believe in a theory
    accepted by almost every scientist for more than a century, and who wants to
    restrict the rights of half the population to make decisions about their own
    body, and thinks that every human being in the world who doesn’t “accept Jesus
    as their saviour” will literally go to hell, would have US voters rolling their
    eyes. But it doesn’t. You can’t, in fact, even think of running for office in
    the world’s only superpower if you don’t, in the now famous words of Alastair
    Campbell, “do God”.

    Bad combination – superpower, and must do god. Even worse combination, world’s only superpower and must do god. Horrendous combination,  world’s only superpower and must do crazy dominionist or Reformed Whateveritis Barking Mad god.

    Here, thank God, Allah, or Big Brother, you can. Here, if you start talking about Jesus, or hell, or hurricanes as warnings from God, you’re more likely to make it into a jungle with Sally Bercow than the Pillared Room at Downing Street. Here, if you start talking about the “inerrancy” of the Bible, or “intelligent design”, you’re likely to trigger some serious concern. Even Tony Blair, who was the nearest we got to a Messiah for a while, didn’t, at least when he was elected, and for quite a while afterwards, talk about God. “It’s difficult if you talk about faith in our political system,” he said in a TV interview after leaving office. “Frankly, people do think you’re a nutter.”

    And then you leave office and start doing god with a vengeance and people realize you’re a nutter.

    In this country, if you’re in public life, you can’t talk about God, but you can talk about “faith groups”. Faith groups are what Tony Blair was thinking of when he started his Tony Blair Faith Foundation. “I set it up,” said the man who helped to start a war that killed more than 100,000 people, “to make the case for religion as a force for good”. Faith groups, according to this view, are nice groups of nice people all wanting to make society better. They are not groups of people who think that people who don’t go to their church, or mosque, or synagogue, or teenage girls who get pregnant, and don’t feel ready to start a family, or people who are sexually attracted to their own sex, will rot in hell.

    Which is why that view is so stupid and so wrong.

    Women have fought hard for the right not to have their bodies controlled by
    somebody else’s God, and so have lesbians and gay men. It’s beginning to look as though we might need to start fighting again.

    Without any help from “faith groups.”