Author: Ophelia Benson

  • What a nice thing to say

    Darrick Lim has been observing the inter-atheist wars. He has kind things to say about me. (Well that’s the important thing; do admit.)

    Fellow atheists Jerry Coyne and Ophelia Benson jump into the fray with their own takes on DBAD. Both are known for taking off the gloves in anti-religion arguments when they deem it appropriate. As an evolutionary biologist, Coyne in particular has little patience for accommodationist views – the belief that science and religion can be reconciled and need not necessarily be at odds with each other. Along with another passionate – some may say ‘cantankerous’ – atheist, the biology professor and blogger PZ Myers (who runs the popular science blog ‘Pharyngula’), Coyne, Benson and other ‘Gnu Atheists’ are considered to be at the ‘meaner’ end of the attitude spectrum.

    Ohhhh. That makes me feel all warm and fuzzy. Mind you, Lim apparently doesn’t consider the putative meanness all that mean; I might not feel very w and f if he meant “meaner” completely literally. But this question of “exactly how mean are the gnu atheists really, when you look at them under a good microscope?” seems to have as many answers as there are people to ask the question, so whatevs.

  • More malevolence

    Via Johann Hari:

    In May 2008, a 15 year old Muslim girl tells her teacher she thinks she might be gay, and the Muslim teacher in a state-funded comprehensive tells her “there are no gays round here” and she will “burn in hell” if she ever acts on it. (I know because she emailed me, suicidal and begging for help). In September 2008, a young gay man called Oliver Hemsley, is walking home from the gay pub the George and Dragon when a gang of young Muslims stabs him eight times, in the back, in the lungs, and in his spinal column. In January 2010, when the thug who did it is convicted, a gang of thirty Muslims storms the George and Dragon in revenge and violently attacks everybody there.

    Because why? Because of a stupid baseless prejudice. Because they eat their boiled eggs from the narrow end instead of the wide end, or is it the other way around. Because they like stripes better than checks. Because they like muesli better than shredded wheat. Because they watch football instead of tennis. Let them burn in hell!

  • Off with her head

    Does god hate women? Do Republicans hate women?

     Georgia State Rep. Bobby Franklin—who last year proposed making rape and domestic violence “victims” into “accusers”—has introduced a 10-page bill that would criminalize miscarriages and make abortion in Georgia completely illegal. Both miscarriages and abortions would be potentially punishable by death: any “prenatal murder” in the words of the bill, including “human involvement” in a miscarriage, would be a felony and carry a penalty of life in prison or death.

    Isn’t that interesting? So a woman has a miscarriage…will the cops be pounding on her door wanting to find out if there was any human involvement in that miscarriage? If so, how will she demonstrate that there wasn’t? Multiply by a large number, given how common miscarriage is.

    There seems to be no chance such a law will be passed, but the filthiness of the mind that suggested it is worth noticing. Malevolence is always worth noticing.

  • A minor point

    What is wrong with the word “harm”? Or “damage”? Why is it always “negatively impact” now? Why is a stupid clumsy circumlocution that includes a noun pretending to be a verb preferable to a single blunt word of one or two syllables?

    Is it for the same reason that so many people say “poor” when they mean bad? “It’s poor weather for a walk.” Because of some nebulous worry that “bad” might hurt someone’s feelings? Like, say, the weather’s?

    Why else would Kathleen Sebelius say it?

    Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, said the rule, issued in the last days of the Bush administration, could “negatively impact patient access to contraception and certain other medical services.”

    Or is it because it sounds more official and like something a cabinet member is supposed to say? But if so, why does it? Why does “negatively impact” now sound somehow superior to “harm”? When it’s so stupid? When “negative” doesn’t mean “bad” and “impact” doesn’t mean “affect”? Why two inexact words when one exact one is readily available?

    You tell me.

  • Bush admin “conscience” rules revised

    2008 rule granted sweeping protections to health care providers who opposed abortion, sterilization and other medical procedures on religious or moral grounds.

  • Can we talk about Muslim homophobia now?

    Yes, it is “Muslim culture” today to be bigoted against gay people. It was British culture to be anti-gay thirty years ago. Cultures change.

  • Priests rape nuns in order to avoid Aids

    Forced to acknowledge the problem, the Vatican has tried to play down its gravity.

  • A miscarriage could be a felony

    A Georgia legislator has introduced a bill that would make miscarriages and abortions potentially punishable by death.

  • Atheists are so stooooopid

    “According to Scripture, the evidence for God is overwhelming.”

  • Jonathan Derbyshire on philosophy for the public

    A growing number of professional philosophers are realising that rigour and accessibility need not be mutually exclusive.

  • Islam and the emerging Arab World

    With the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt, and a series of ongoing protest sweeping across other countries of North Africa and the Middle East, a new Arab world is imminent. The old Arab world is slowly and gradually fading away and ushering in a new era of hope, freedom and progress. But there are uncertainties and anxieties as to what this wind of change holds for the people in the region and the world at large. There is a growing concern as to what would be the role of Islam in the new dispensation particularly in this era of Islamic terrorism. The Arab world and the Islamic world are often seen as identical. North Africa and the Middle East are the world’s political and financial capital of Islam. In fact the Arab League is the Islamic league-it promotes Islam, defends Islam and would want the criticism of Islam criminalized globally. Most of the islamic groups that terrorize the world are headquartered or have strong links in North Africa and the Middle East. One hopes that these changes do not play into the hands of islamic extremists, jihadists and fundamentalists in the regions. But it must be noted that unlike many protests and demonstrations in these countries, the anger-popular anger- is not directed on Israel or on ‘infidels’ or on Western countries and their leaders or on those who ‘insult’ Islam or Prophet Muhammad. The protests are against local leaders and their governments, against prevailing corruption, poverty, unemployment and lack of democracy in these countries. The protests are for radical change and reform. So the revolutions sweeping across North Africa and the Middle East are not Islamic revolutions meant to spread the faith and foist islamic theocracies on the world. From all indications, the ongoing protests in the Arab world are not jihads against unbelievers. They are popular secular democratic revolutions. They are expressions of people’s yearnings and aspirations for progress and good governance. They are popular agitations for freedom, emancipation and change.

    Today more than ever the Arab world is in a position to dispel the looming Islamic Dark Age and realize a New Enlightenment. The Arab world is in a position to translate itself into a beacon of civilization and universal human rights. The Arab world is in a position to break away with the past- the past of religious(Islamic) fanaticism, racism, slavery, subordination of women, honor killing and homophobia.

    The people of North Africa and the Middle East must strive to preserve the democratic and secular nature of this wind of change and deepen its gains. They should not allow Islamists-Islamic jihadists, terrorists and brotherhoods- to hijack this historic process and rob them of this vital opportunity to realize an Arab civilization with a global dimension.

    To this end, the people of new North Africa and the Middle East should stir their ‘new’ governments away from religion particularly Islam. They should ensure a total separation of Mosque and State. In the new Arab world, the states should be religiously neutral-not biased for or against Islam or any religious or non religious outlook. The states should guarantee the equal rights of all individuals in spite of their religious belief or unbelief including the rights of individuals to profess or renounce Islam. The states should protect the rights of all persons to intellectual freedom, the exercise doubt or the entertainment of opinions that are critical of Islam or of prophet Muhammad or of any religious or secular ideas and institution. The states in the new(emerging) Arab world should discard the so called Universal Human Rights Under Islam and abolish sharia law. Human rights are universal. There are no special rights for those who live under Islam. In fact the ‘new’ Arab states should be poised to reform Islam and bring the religion into the 21st century. They should be ready to combat human rights abuses that are committed in the name of Islam.

    The states should protect the rights of all religious minorities and abolish all legal provisions that discriminate against anybody on the basis of religious belief or unbelief. The people of the new Arab world should not relent but fight on and use this opportunity to realize cultural renaissance and rebirth.

  • Social pressure? What social pressure?

    Greta Christina observes that atheism is not always greeted with open arms. It doesn’t always get even a mere hostile silence. It sometimes gets just plain forcible rejection. Just good old “no you may not.” Just “sit down and be quiet you hateful atheist you.”

    Resistance to atheist groups from high school administrators, while not universal, is depressingly common. According to JT Eberhard, campus organizer and high school specialist for the SSA, “Most of them seem to elect to try and drag their feet until the interested students either lose interest or graduate. The ‘objections’ are varied. I’ve heard ‘it would be too controversial’, ‘all clubs are secular’, ‘other groups already do the same thing’, and a whole host of other lame reasons.”

    And this, you see, is one reason we explicit atheists fight back. It’s not necessarily because we are bullied or oppressed ourselves, it’s because a view that we think right and important and under-represented gets treated like a contaminant.

    The need for high school atheist groups — or indeed, for atheist groups of any kind — is baffling to many people. When USA Today ran an article about Brian Lisco and the SSA’s new high school program, it was met with a barrage of hostile comments… partly in the hysterical “Satan is trolling for the souls of our youth!” vein, but largely with puzzlement and snark, along the lines of, “Why would anyone need a club to talk about what they don’t believe in?”

    But the powerful resistance these groups have encountered makes the need for them all too clear. The reality is that atheists are the most distrusted and disliked of all minority groups — more than blacks, Hispanics, Jews, Muslims, immigrants, and gays and lesbians — and polls show that Americans are less likely to vote for an atheist than they are for a person in any other minority or marginalized category.

    All very recursive. We need groups because of the marginalization, so the attempts to set up groups are marginalized, so we need the groups all the more, so; repeat until tired.

    Countering anti-atheist myths is important even when the bigotry isn’t overtly threatening or grotesque. Myths about atheists are widespread, even among more moderate and progressive believers. Countering those myths requires visibility — and visibility is more effective with organization. Groups can provide emotional support to people who are coming out when they face opposition and hatred… and groups can make visibility easier to accomplish. As Eberhard points out, “One of the best ways gay students have acquired a greater level of acceptance is by ‘coming out’, so that many people are now realizing that they not only know gay people but that they like gay people. So it must be with atheists. We need to encourage non-believing students to be proud of who they are if the social stigma is to ever be dissolved.”

    And not just in high school. Even among adults, even among meta-adults (which is to say, old adults), myths about atheists are widespread, even among more moderate and progressive believers, and even among actual atheists. Atheists who hate atheists; talk about internalization.

    So – let the groups spread – let people grow up familiar with atheists – and eventually the automatic hatred will fade away.

  • Kadyrov looking for 2d wife, can’t find pretty one

    Chechen leader has described women as the property of their husbands and says their main role is to bear children.

  • Lysenko’s tomb: Darwin, Dawkins and the left

    Misunderstanding the selfish gene, decade after decade.

  • Hitchens on Obama on Arab uprisings

    The Obama administration contrived to come up with an argument that maximized every form of feebleness.

  • High school atheists organize, schools resist

    Atheists are the most distrusted and disliked of all minority groups in the US – more than blacks, Hispanics, Jews, Muslims, immigrants, and gays and lesbians.

  • Abortion is not an option in Chile

    The Catholic church has a stranglehold on Chile.