Author: Paul Kurtz and Tom Flynn

  • New Dimensions for American Democracy

    At long last, a protracted and often fierce election campaign is over. America has selected its new president. We congratulate Barack Obama, and we pledge our support for his efforts!

    President-elect Obama will face awesome problems left over from the Bush administration. But let us focus on the positive. Obama is the first person of mixed Anglo-African parentage to attain the presidency. Heroically, he represents a significant extension of the scope of American democracy. His election reminds us that the United States really is the universal society on this planet and reconfirms America’s identity as a truly (if not yet perfectly) multiracial, multi-ethnic, multicultural nation. Bravo!

    The United States is the first major country founded under the ideals of the Enlightenment, committed to the secular values of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” America is a land of opportunity and individual achievement; its civic faith in progress, education, science, humanism, and democratic values is well justified.

    Yet it comes at a price. Almost a century was required to overcome the moral blot of slavery. It has taken another century and a third since the Civil War to make the nation significantly more inclusive. America has elected a biracial president; had the Democratic primaries turned out differently, the nation would most likely have elected a woman. How long will it take before an open nonbeliever can be elected to high office? The U.S. Constitution states that “no religious test shall ever be required” to hold “any office or public trust.” Yet surveys still show that a majority of Americans would not vote for an atheist candidate for president. Clearly there is more work to be done to realize a truly secular society.

    In order that the ideals of democracy may be extended further, we offer some basic, humanistic ethical principles and goals that we hope the nation can achieve in the coming years. Even as they confront an economic crisis of massive proportions, we call on President Obama and the new Congress to base their actions on the following principles:

    • Renewal of regulation for the protection of the public. The unlimited free market has been discredited. Virtually every other democratic society displays a mixed economy with robust public and private sectors. America needs to learn from this example.
    • Universal health care. We view health care as a human right. Every major democracy except the United States has universal health care. While preserving a significant private component, it is time to enact legislation that ensures that every American is covered.
    • The right to privacy. Every person should have the personal freedom to pursue his or her values and style of life, so long as he or she does not prohibit others from exercising like rights
    • Equal access. Every person, regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, or class, should have the opportunity to realize his or her goals without being hampered by discrimination.
    • Equality of concern. All individuals should (a) be considered as equal before the law; (b) have the same right to education, whether poor or rich; and (c) enjoy the opportunity to pursue gainful employment.
    • Civil liberties. In a free and open democratic society, any effort to censor or restrict free expression must be impermissible. This encompasses the right of each individual to believe in and practice a chosen religion—but also the right of dissent and nonbelief.
    • Separation of church and state. The United States needs to adhere to the First Amendment. We call upon President Obama to rise above his campaign rhetoric on this issue and end public support for faith-based charities as a violation of the First Amendment.
    • Commitment to developing alternative energy sources. We need to refocus national policy based on an energy mantra that exhorts us to go green, green, green! in place of drill, drill, drill.
    • Restoring respect for U.S. leadership in world affairs. The war in Iraq needs to be resolved by the new administration as soon as possible. Ideally, this should include some form of truth commission that would investigate key members of the previous administration for their roles in taking the nation to war on false pretenses, establishing an illegal doctrine of preemptive warfare, and instituting such repellent practices as torture and indefinite detention. America should refocus its foreign policy and commit to using first diplomacy rather than military force as it seeks to resolve conflicts peacefully in cooperation with others in the world.

    POSTSCRIPT

    Finally, we recommend two reforms of the electoral system.

    First, the election just concluded consumed two years, tremendous energy, and unprecedented levels of funding. We recommend that a special commission be appointed by the president in consultation with Congress to move beyond the grueling state-by-state primary system, perhaps to regional primaries and a shortened electoral process.

    Second, we recommend that vice-presidential candidates be selected by regional primaries and political conventions, not simply chosen by the presidential nominee. Three twentieth-century presidents died in office (William McKinley, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and John F. Kennedy) and were succeeded by their vice presidents. Although we think that Obama’s selection of Joseph Biden was a sensible choice, John McCain’s selection of the unqualified Sarah Palin was not. Clearly the present process is insufficient. In our view, the vice president should be selected by the public through the primary process rather than being the sole and autocratic choice of the candidate. Let the people decide!

  • Why It Was Somewhat Emotional

    ‘It was a day most never imagined that they would live to see.’

  • International Reaction to Obama

    America’s choice of such a skillful straddler of global identities cannot help but transform the nation’s image.

  • U.S. Airstrike Reported to Hit Afghan Wedding

    Afghan officials said the strike killed 40 civilians and wounded 28 others in Kandahar Province.

  • Prop 8 Passes in California

    But Washington state voted to allow doctor-assisted suicide for terminally ill people.

  • Full Text of Obama’s Grant Park Speech

    If this financial crisis taught us anything, it’s that we cannot have a thriving Wall Street while Main Street suffers.

  • AI Talks About Somali Stoning on ‘Today’

    Reporter and director of Amnesty International, discuss the influence of Al Shabab.

  • Gallery Attacked Over ‘Insulting’ Art

    Windows at the SaLon Gallery were smashed after abusive phone calls about the images.

  • Exciting New Dutch Blasphemy Law

    Will protect people from ‘indirect insult’ on the basis of religion or ‘conviction’ – so nearly everything could be illegal.

  • Aisha Ibrahim Duhulow Begged for Mercy

    Court authorities claim she ‘wanted Sharia law and the deserved punishment to apply.’ Witnesses say otherwise.

  • Vatican-Muslim Summit in Rome

    Vatican-Atheist summit and Muslim-Atheist summit not scheduled.

  • The Republican Glossary


    Usage

    My friends

    Energizing the base (1)

    Energizing the base (2)

    Gaffe

    Straight talk

    Palling around with terrorists

    Health care

    Charismatic

    Ready to be president

    Underestimating Sarah Palin

    Joe Six-pack

    Joe the plumber

    Maverick

    Real American Hero

    “Tested”

    Energy policy

    Environment

    Elite

    Change (real)

    Reaching across the aisle

    Economic policy

    Race card

    Real America

    Socialist

    Bold new vision

    Pit bull

    Feminist

    Socialist

    Second Amendment Rights

    Surge

    Strong on foreign policy

    Strong on security

    Early voting

    Definition

    Rabble
    Inciting to riot
    Wink and wave
    Inadvertant Straight talk
    scripted comment
    Conversation with Mensa members
    Tea
    Draws breath

    Charismatic
    Listening to Sarah Palin
    One of my friends
    Joe Six-pack’s dumber brother
    Unbranded range animal
    Shot down over Nam
    Anger issues
    Drill baby drill
    What we see when we breathe
    Other people’s cocktail parties
    What to do with a subject
    Present in Senate chamber
    “The Bush Tax Cuts”
    The one up my sleeve
    Where my friends live
    Other people’s neighborhoods
    New eyeglass prescription; tea
    What lives under Joe Sixpack’s trailer
    Hockey mom with pregnant teenager
    Hockey mom on unemployment

    Dead timberwolf mother
    Mop and bucket
    Can’t locate Iran on a map

    Foreign policy overrated anyway

    Lottery

  • Inflammatory

    The Independent, or at least Arifa Akbar in The Independent, reports on attacks on a London art gallery but also, four words in, cites ‘inflammatory images.’ The art gallery was attacked but it had been quite naughty.

    A gallery showing inflammatory images of veiled Muslims, including a bare-breasted woman partially clad in a burqa, is under police surveillance after being attacked earlier this week.

    But the images are not ‘inflammatory’ unless people decide they are. It is open to people not to see them as inflammatory.

    I don’t want to push that thought too hard. I don’t want to claim that it’s universally applicable – I don’t want to claim that nothing is genuinely malicious and aggressive unless someone decides it is. I don’t believe in applying Stoic reasoning to everything. I just want to make the drearily familiar claim that some kinds of speech and expression are genuinely racist or sexist or in some other way an attack on people as a group, and that others are not, and that we shouldn’t confuse the two, and that confusing the two is a way to undermine all kinds of rightly-valued freedoms and capabilities.

    Maple, from Sussex, has upset the Islamic world before. An exhibition by her earlier this year showed Muslim women in provocative poses, including one suggestively sucking on a banana.

    There again. Maple hasn’t ‘upset the Islamic world’; the ‘Islamic world’ or rather a very small fraction of it has chosen to be upset. It has no real or legitimate reason to be upset.

    Mokhtar Badri, the vice-president of the Muslim Association of Britain, said that while he thought the exhibition provocative, he defended freedom of expression and condemned any violence inspired by the display. “I urged the gallery and the artist to respect the community in the area, but if Muslims see the work and dislike it, it is completely wrong to use any violent expression of that,” he added.

    Good that he condemned violence, but urging the gallery and the artist to respect the community in the area in fact just reinforces the message that galleries and artists have to creep around whatever ‘area’ they happen to be in and find out what all the local prejudices are and then ‘respect’ them, which in the case of Sarah Maples of course would have meant simply not showing her paintings at all. (And would the Indy have refrained from calling the images ‘inflammatory’ if the gallery had been in Chelsea or Hampstead or Cheam? I doubt it.) Urging the gallery and the artist to respect the community is a kind of first small step in the direction of overt coercion and eventually violence – which is not to say that Badri should be censored, just that he is wrong.

  • New Humanist’s Bad Faith Awards

    Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin; more to come.

  • The Hijacking of ‘Stop Sylvia Browne’

    Grabbing the website of a critic and filling it with your own content — that’s just sleazy.

  • Fred Phelps’s Son Talks About Life With Father

    It was hell. Nate is now an atheist, and agrees with Dawkins that religion is abusive to children.

  • Women’s Rights Defenders Seek Protection

    The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights heard testimony from women’s rights groups.

  • Virginia Woolf and the Servant Question

    The Woolfs paid their servants the meager wages typical of the era, £40 a year when they earned £4,000.