Ten Christians whined to Sainsbury’s and that was enough.… Read the rest
All entries by this author
Narnia Tripe
Dec 5th, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
To be ‘morally mature’ is to ‘acknowledge’ a lot of nonsense because there are different concepts of reality.… Read the rest
Brothers of Hatan Surucu on Trial for Her Murder
Dec 5th, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Mothers seek solidarity by forcing daughters to submit to the same hardship and suffering.… Read the rest
Wikipedia and the Accuracy Problem
Dec 5th, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Universe of global communication and research includes volunteer vandals with poison-pen intellects.… Read the rest
The Guardian Used to be a Secular Paper
Dec 5th, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
But that was then, editor says cheerfully.… Read the rest
When in Doubt, Call It Munchausen’s by Proxy
Dec 5th, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Like many another secret world the Family Division was liable to be swept by pseudo-scientific manias.… Read the rest
Adults Should Take a Sickbag to ‘Narnia’
Dec 5th, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
‘Narnia represents everything that is most hateful about religion.’… Read the rest
Gaslight
Dec 4th, 2005 8:14 pm | By Ophelia BensonSpeaking of ethics and politeness, the difference between what one has a right to do and what is right to do – as we just were in comments on ‘A Valediction Forbidding Nonsense’ – I’ve been pondering a certain pattern of behavior which I’ve seen in a few people I know (especially, but not exclusively, in rich people I know) and find interesting. I should give it a name, for ease of reference – but it’s hard to think of one, because it’s a complicated pattern, with several steps.
Step 1. Volunteer the statement – unprompted by the other party – that you are going to do something. Perhaps something generous or kind or helpful, something extra – give a … Read the rest
John Gray Calls Himself a Heretic
Dec 4th, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
‘His fiercest scorn has switched to the disciples of rationalism and of science.’… Read the rest
Knowing our own Minds
Dec 4th, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Do we have privileged access but not peculiar, or peculiar but not privileged?… Read the rest
References not to Gramsci but to Sayyid Qutb
Dec 4th, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Self-appointed rebel heroes like to adorn themselves with flattering titles.… Read the rest
Naturalism v Supernaturalism
Dec 3rd, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Worldview based on empirical inquiry, not faith or authority, is the clear choice against totalitarianism… Read the rest
Chet Raymo on Meera Nanda
Dec 3rd, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
What looks like tolerant ‘permission to be different’ is actually condescension.… Read the rest
Instead of Celebrating Einstein Year
Dec 3rd, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Physicists worry about dramatic decline in the number of pupils studying physics at school.… Read the rest
New Homeopathy ‘Study’ a Tiny Bit Flawed
Dec 3rd, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
No control group, glaring exclusions and bias, little things like that.… Read the rest
Richard Dawkins on the Illusion of Design
Dec 3rd, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
The unaided laws of physics could come to mimic deliberate design.… Read the rest
Nothing Like Squalor to Trigger Nostalgia
Dec 3rd, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Fleet Street hacks get bad rap; Scoop, Boot, Beast, set tone.… Read the rest
Tories Pick Posh Leader Thanks to Hugh Grant
Dec 3rd, 2005 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
‘Notting Hill’ made it cool to be posh therefore Eton is okay. Eh?… Read the rest
A Valediction Forbidding Nonsense
Dec 3rd, 2005 2:07 am | By Ophelia BensonA couple of passages from the president of the Royal Society’s valedictory speech because they are so B&W.
… Read the restIn short, I guess that the same ill-understood circumstances that allow complex human societies to arise and persist also – and perhaps necessarily – have elements that are strongly antithetic to the values of the Enlightenment. What are these values? They are tolerance of diversity, respect for individual liberty of conscience, and above all recognition that an ugly fact trumps a beautiful theory or a cherished belief. All ideas should be open to questioning, and the merit of ideas should be assessed on the strength of the evidence that supports them and not on the credentials or affiliations of the individuals proposing
Dr Steve Steve
Dec 2nd, 2005 7:40 pm | By Ophelia BensonAnother brief item. Something I noticed yesterday when coding Meera’s wonderful article – on the Amazon page for Prophets Facing Backward there is, of all things in the world, a recommendation by (wait for it) Steve Fuller. What does he say?
This first detailed examination of postmodernism’s politically reactionary consequences should serve as a wake-up call for all conscientious leftists.
Uh…hello? This is the same Steve Fuller – the very same Steve Fuller, my darlings – who testified for the defense – for the ID side – at Dover a few weeks ago. So – uh – uh – what can one possibly wonder other than ‘why didn’t he heed his own advice?’ Why didn’t he hear his own wake-up … Read the rest
