The title of Dawkins’s new post asks a question: Are there emotional no-go areas where logic dare not show its face? The first paragraph re-words the question.
Are there kingdoms of emotion where logic is taboo, dare not show its face, zones where reason is too intimidated to speak?
My answer is yes, of course there are. Not the ones he has in mind, necessarily, but there are some. There are plenty of situations where reason just isn’t wanted, only sympathy or affection or solidarity or just warm-bodiedness will do. There are others where only joyous abandon is wanted.
But that’s interpersonal; RD is talking about public discourse. That’s different. Discourse by definition rests on at least minimal reason and … Read the rest
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
