There’s another entry for the What to call it problem. It comes from a comment by Richard Wein on Dan’s post replying to Dr Coyne.
Much of the confusion over “science” and “scientism” arises from the tendency of some New Atheists (including Coyne) to stretch the word “science” to mean all of empirical inference. I think this stretching is based on a correct realisation that all of empirical inference lies on a continuum, with no clear lines of demarcation between formal science, philosophy, history, everyday inference, etc.
That’s exactly what I was talking about.
… Read the restWe need a better word for “good, secular thinking” that includes science but is not limited to it. We need a word that encompasses law,
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
