Some fella says Richard Dawkins is bad and stupid and cynical and anti-intellectual because he refuses to debate William Lane Craig.
Really?
Well not the bad and stupid part, no, that’s my paraphrase, but it’s not far off; and the rest of it, yes, really.
Richard Dawkins is not alone in his refusal to debate with William Lane Craig. The vice-president of the British Humanist Association (BHA), AC Grayling has also flatly refused to debate Craig, stating that he would rather debate “the existence of fairies and water-nymphs”.
Yes, and? Are they required (morally though not legally) to debate anyone who asks? Are they not allowed to choose?
… Read the restGiven that there isn’t much in the way of serious argumentation
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
