The prize is a free pilgrimage to a holy site of their chosen ‘faith.’ Interesting idea of an incentive…… Read the rest
All entries by this author
BBC Says How Wonderful Opus Dei Is
Jul 4th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘As it spreads its message of finding holiness in everyday life, it seems determined to continue growing its influence.’… Read the rest
Now Palin’s Prepared Remarks Are Incoherent
Jul 4th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonShe’s quitting her job because she’s not a quitter. Only dead fish go with the flow, so she’s outta here.… Read the rest
God is Back, and Eagleton is his Prophet
Jul 4th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘Eagleton carves up the “militant” atheists using their own weapons of reason.’ Well not exactly.… Read the rest
Sarah Palin Gets All Mavericky Again
Jul 4th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIt’s all mavericky and quirky to stop doing your job all of a sudden. It’s like MacArthur, too.… Read the rest
Second prize: a visit to the piranhas
Jul 4th, 2009 11:22 am | By Ophelia BensonEven funnier than Sarah Palin.
A Turkish game show is challenging atheists to reassess their views and win “the biggest prize ever”. Penitents Compete will bring together an Islamic imam, a Jewish rabbi, a Buddhist monk and a Greek Orthodox priest seeking to convert the atheists. The prize for any converted contestants is an expenses-paid pilgrimage to a holy site of their chosen faith.
But that’s not a prize unless you do in fact convert, so it’s not going to function as a prize for the people who are supposed to convert because they won’t want the thing offered – it won’t appeal to them – in fact it will repel them. It’s like saying the prize is a … Read the rest
Sarah Palin as ‘Diva’ and ‘Whack Job’
Jul 3rd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonA public official who often seems proud of what she does not know is not only accepted but applauded. … Read the rest
FMU Urges Schools to be Aware of Signs
Jul 3rd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonNew guidance is being published urging schools to identify signs of forced marriages ahead of the holidays.… Read the rest
The Stoning of Soraya M.
Jul 3rd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘I wanted people to never forget what a stoning really is.’ It’s not just one rock and it’s over.… Read the rest
Moses Just Loves the Burqa
Jul 3rd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonMo on the other hand suddenly finds his getting stuffy.… Read the rest
Jesus and Mo on Science-Religion Compatibility
Jul 3rd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonDudes it’s so totally easy.… Read the rest
Not that kind of compatibility
Jul 3rd, 2009 11:36 am | By Ophelia BensonChris Mooney (yes, it’s not over after all) disagrees with Jerry Coyne (and by extension me, and Austin Cline, and anyone else who has made the same point) about what the Pew report tells us about the putative compatibility of science and religion.
… Read the restLet me say at the outset that I find it regrettable, just as Dr. Coyne does, that people are rejecting scientific findings due to their religion. That’s not cool. It’s not acceptable. And it is of course one of the key reasons we have an “unscientific America.”
But where Coyne sees sheer science-religion incompatibility, I see something else: An opportunity. For it seems to me that if we could only dislodge the idea that evolution is contradictory
Bunting redux
Jul 2nd, 2009 5:41 pm | By Ophelia BensonGuess who’s back – why, it’s Madeleine Bunting. ‘What’s she up to now?’ you cry in pleased surprise. She’s going out of her way to show us how silly she can be, yet again.
There is a school of thought that the new atheists have so polarised the debate about the relationship between science and religion that it’s not a conversation worth having. The “Ditchkins” – as Terry Eagleton describes them in his recent book – have developed such a crude argument about religion based on their boasted ignorance of the thinking which underpins belief that it’s hard to know how a dialogue is possible.
‘School of thought’ – she means herself saying it, and Terry Eagleton saying it, … Read the rest
India: Activists Welcome Delhi Court Ruling
Jul 2nd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘Families who use this section to scare their children and get them married forcibly won’t be able to do so.’… Read the rest
India: Gay Sex Decriminalized
Jul 2nd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe ruling overturns a 148-year-old colonial law which calls a same-sex relationship an ‘unnatural offence.’… Read the rest
Madeleine Bunting on Science and Religion
Jul 2nd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonNo actually it turns out to be about ‘the New Atheists’ again. And ‘Ditchkins.’ Deep stuff.… Read the rest
Zeinab Huq on Sharia Up Close and Personal
Jul 2nd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonWhatever the protestations of its fans, this system of law does not favour women.… Read the rest
Johann Hari on ‘Does God Hate Women?’
Jul 2nd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonAfter all the arguments for subordinating women have been shown to be self-serving lies, what are misogynists left with?… Read the rest
Compatibility
Jul 2nd, 2009 7:47 am | By Ophelia BensonWe’ve seen that Mooney and Kirshenbaum claim that ‘faith and science are perfectly compatible.’
Austin Cline has a very helpful post explaining how this is done.
… Read the restChris Mooney regularly insists that all he wants is to promote the “pragmatic” position that science and religion are compatible. He doesn’t want critics of religion and theism to “shut up,” he just doesn’t want them to keep being so publicly critical. This differs from shutting up in that… well, Chris Mooney can’t quite explain how it differs. But it does, really. You can trust him on that.
As a demonstration of just how trustworthy Chris Mooney is, as well as a demonstration of just what he he thinks “framing” is all about,
The rest of chapter 8
Jul 1st, 2009 3:16 pm | By Ophelia BensonMoving on.
Scientists as a group are more secular than ‘the rest of the nation.’ Religion is an emotional matter. Creationists fear that evolution [the subject, not evolution itself] will ‘undermine their religious culture.’
Abrasive atheism can only exacerbate this anxiety and reinforce the misimpression that scientific inquiry leads inevitably to the erosion of religion and values. [p. 100]
They apparently mean ‘abrasive atheism’ of scientists there, but they failed to specify that, which is one problem throughout – a constant tendency to overbroaden their claims and confuse the issue. As it stands the claim is nonsensical – ‘abrasive’ atheism as such can only exacerbate fear of evolution? Well, possibly, but it’s not obvious how CM and SK know that. … Read the rest