Franklin, a model to generations of scholars, students, and activists, had few peers. … Read the rest
All entries by this author
Strunk and White Are a Terrible Influence
Apr 12th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe grammatical advice is so inaccurate that counterexamples often show up on the very same page.… Read the rest
Here kitty kitty kitty kitty
Apr 11th, 2009 6:14 pm | By Ophelia BensonOut of curiosity, since Jean told us Jon Stewart did a segment playing off the word ‘pussy,’ I googled his name and ‘pussy’ – and got a lot of hits, most of them not about that segment. They don’t support the ‘pussy just means kittycat’ view.
You already know my feelings on Stewart, particularly after that notorious appearance on Crossfire – but you’re being much to kind to call him a wimp, I’ve always felt that he’s a big pussy, period.
Wimp is too nice, you see; Stewart is worse than that; he’s a big pussy.
… Read the restThank you to the team at Josh Marshall’s liberal TPM blog for putting together this lovely clip
Trickery at sea
Apr 11th, 2009 5:43 pm | By Ophelia BensonAn interesting bit of moral idiocy:
[T]he Somali pirate commander warned against any forcible intervention. “I’m afraid this matter is likely to create disaster because it is taking too long and we are getting information that the Americans are planning rescue tricks like the French commandos did,” Abdi Garad said.
Tricks. That’s good, isn’t it? People attempting to rescue a guy being forcibly held by heavily armed thieves are accused by the thieves of planning ‘tricks.’ The pirates inform all parties a week in advance that they will be seizing their ships and threatening their lives, do they? All open and aboveboard? All strictly according to Hoyle?
Right.… Read the rest
How do you know?
Apr 11th, 2009 5:35 pm | By Ophelia BensonRussell Blackford makes an important point:
… Read the rest[I]t’s become increasingly apparent to me, partly from the Voices of Disbelief exercise, that many people in the bioethics community are fed up with the never-ending resistance from religionists to rational bioethics. Some of them are asking what credentials religion has anyway. Religious leaders are, of course, able to put their arguments in public, like anyone else. But they cannot expect anyone to defer to them if they rely on controversial religious claims…I suggest that religious leaders should be free to put their arguments, but if the arguments depend on doctrines such as ensoulment, the views of God, the sanctity of the natural order, and so on, these popes and priests should not
A N Wilson and Jesus thrash the evil secularists
Apr 11th, 2009 1:16 pm | By Ophelia BensonI don’t read the Daily Mail; I know its reputation, so I avoid even sampling it, because I get enough aggressive stupidity right here at home; but I made an exception for A N Wilson on evil secularism, and I’m quite startled by its frank vulgarity. He’s not a moron, Wilson, at least I thought he wasn’t, but this stuff…
… Read the restThis playground attitude accounts for much of the attitude towards Christianity that you pick up, say, from the alternative comedians, and the casual light blasphemy of jokes on TV or radio. It also lends weight to the fervour of the anti-God fanatics, such as the writer Christopher Hitchens and the geneticist Richard Dawkins, who think all the evil in
That is not what this public debate is about
Apr 11th, 2009 1:08 pm | By Ophelia BensonStop the presses – a Catholic archbishop is a Catholic archbishop. He disagrees with Tony Blair about homosexuality. Stone the crows.
Mr Blair is a very fine politician and he has got very well-tuned political senses. But I am afraid the way the Catholic Church thinks is rather different to that and I think I will take my guide from Pope Benedict actually.
Well yes, we know. The way the Catholic church thinks is rather different: it ignores new ideas and knowledge about what is best for human beings, what does and does not harm people, what is and is not fair in human terms, and the like, and instead it consults its prejudices, attributes them to an unavailable … Read the rest
Tennessee: Tornado Kills Woman and Baby
Apr 11th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonSurvivors rush to thank God for sparing them.… Read the rest
Jonathan Turley on Laws Against ‘Religious Hatred’
Apr 11th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThey’re a bad idea.… Read the rest
Johann Hari on What-aboutery
Apr 11th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe best way to respond is to state a simple truth: there can be more than one bad thing in the world. … Read the rest
A N Wilson Talks the Extraordinary Dreck
Apr 11th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonSneer, sneer, sneer, sneer, I’m better than they are, sneer.… Read the rest
Catholic Archbishop Talks the Usual Dreck
Apr 11th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe pope was defending African women, it’s a sensitive point, I’m not going to answer your question.… Read the rest
Bishop Insists: the Resurrection is Real
Apr 11th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIt really really really happened. We know this.… Read the rest
Among the bottom-feeders
Apr 10th, 2009 5:17 pm | By Ophelia BensonI had another look at that post David Thompson did last July, and noticed a couple of things. Ironically (or not) I wanted to address that post in a substantive way at the time, and was just about to, but then the torrent of sexist abuse killed any interest in engaging, so I never got to it. This is, by the way, one reason epithets are not such a great thing: discussions that collapse into stupid name-calling do not generally also manage to discuss ideas in a substantive way. That’s probably because discussions that collapse into stupid name-calling tend to repel intelligent people and attract stupid ones, which makes substantive discussion kind of difficult. There is something quite risible … Read the rest
A few days in the low countries
Apr 10th, 2009 5:00 pm | By Ophelia BensonThis discussion gets more and more peculiar and interesting as it goes on. There is a whiff of disingenuousness about much of it – a peculiar air of outraged innocence about something that many people take to be a very overt insult. The thing that’s peculiar about that is that usually when we are told we have accidentally said something insulting – we blush and stammer and hasten to explain that we didn’t mean it that way. We don’t insist on going on using the word in the way we (but not other people) understand it. Yet this apparently doesn’t apply to epithets about women. That’s interesting.
Suppose you know a little Dutch, and you’re in Haarlem visiting friends, and … Read the rest
A Telephone to God
Apr 10th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonBut you have to leave a message. No reports of God calling back yet.… Read the rest
What’s New About New Atheism?
Apr 10th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe more clerics rely on arguments based on religious claims, the more those claims will be challenged.… Read the rest
Michael Ruse on ‘Darwinism’ and Christianity
Apr 10th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIf a parent objects to what a child is being taught in science class, the teaching is religious and unconstitutional.… Read the rest
Ellen Johnson Sirleaf on ‘Fresh Air’
Apr 10th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe president of Liberia talks to Terry Gross.… Read the rest
Transcending Madeleine Bunting
Apr 10th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonBunting argues all systems of thought rely on myth. Not all of them do. One in particular: thinking.… Read the rest