Author: Ophelia Benson

  • Preferences

    Here’s a news flash: Arabs are preferred over other nations.

    The fact that Allah Most High has chosen the Arabs over other nations is affirmed in rigorously authenticated hadiths of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and give him peace; related by Bukhari and Muslim in their “Sahih” in the beginning of the chapter of merits, 5897, on the authority of Wathilah ibn al-Asqa` who said, “I heard the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, say, ‘Verily Allah has chosen Kinanah from the son of Isma`il, and He has chosen Quraysh from among Kinanah and He has chosen Hashim from among Quraysh and He has chosen me from the Bani Hashim.’”

    So that’s that, isn’t it. A guy said he heard Mo say that Allah chose him and some other guys, so that (obviously) makes it so. Therefore, Arabs are Topp.

    Therefore the preference of Arabs over other nations, and the preference of some Arabs over other Arabs is affirmed in the Sacred Law. Allah has even preferred some months over other months and some days and nights of over others, as well as places. So in the same way, Allah Glorious and Exalted is He, has chosen some men over others, such as the prophets over others and even some prophets over other prophets. Muslims should not have any objection to this, because all of this returns to the wisdom of the Most Wise, Glorious is He, who is not asked about what He does, but rather, they are the ones who are asked.

    Unanswerable, innit. Allah prefers various things over various other things, because somebody said so, and don’t bother objecting to it, because Allah doesn’t take questions, though he damn well does dish them out if he feels like it, so don’t say another word.

    That’s the way to cultivate critical thinking and independence of mind and healthy skepticism and the urge to look behind the curtain.

    It also sheds a harsh and unpleasant light on Darfur, and the treatment of domestic workers from the Philippines in Saudi Arabia, and what Saudi textbooks say about Jews.

  • A crowd of men stands by, watching silently

    Sometimes the red mist of rage just overpowers the ability to say anything judicious or coherent – and one is reduced to impotent vindictive quivering.

    Muslim Khan is beginning to do that to me. He’s the Taliban ‘spokesman’ in Swat, and he’s been doing a lot of talking lately. Every fucking word out of his mouth is disgusting bullying crap. (See what I mean? I can’t characterize it any more eloquently than that.)

    The two-minute video, shot using a mobile phone, shows a burka-clad woman face down on the ground. Two men hold her arms and feet while a third, a black-turbaned fighter with a flowing beard, whips her repeatedly. “Please stop it,” she begs, alternately whimpering or screaming in pain with each blow to the backside. “Either kill me or stop it now.” A crowd of men stands by, watching silently. Off camera a voice issues instructions. “Hold her legs tightly,” he says as she squirms and yelps. After 34 lashes the punishment stops and the wailing woman is led into a stone building, trailed by a Kalashnikov-carrying militant. Reached by phone, Taliban spokesman Muslim Khan claimed responsibility for the flogging. “She came out of her house with another guy who was not her husband, so we must punish her. There are boundaries you cannot cross,” he said. He defended the Taliban’s right to thrash women shoppers who were inappropriately dressed, saying it was permitted under Islamic law.

    Look…even if you think that the girl did something wrong (which of course I don’t), even if you think she should be punished in some way (which of course I don’t) – even then these guys are a pack of disgusting bullying ruthless mindless bastards. Even if you accept their stupid reactionary stultifying premises, they still come out as utterly disgusting men who see nothing wrong with exercising their strength on people weaker than they are.

    I am so sick of reading about groups of men collaborating in violence against a single unarmed woman. I am so sick of hearing about men who can’t see anything wrong with bullying people who are in their power. I’m so sick of it that I can’t say anything sensible about it – I can only swear and rant and fume. They make me want to vomit.

  • The Taliban v the Rights of Women and Girls

    Human rights are not a sideshow. They are the whole game.

  • Taliban Boasts of Flogging Women

    Spokesman Muslim Khan says Islamic law permits male thugs to thrash women for blah blah.

  • Anger at Law Imposing Submission on Women

    Michael Ignatieff said he was outraged on behalf of Afghan women who deserve better from their country.

  • Critics Say Afghan Law ‘Legalizes Rape’

    Shiite lawmaker involved in drafting it says the law gives more rights to women than UK or US does.

  • UN Rights Commissioner Slams Afghan Law

    Navi Pillay calls the new Afghan law a huge step in the wrong direction.

  • 40 Lashes for Using Cloth With ‘Allah’ On It

    Summary Court in Jeddah sentenced an Asian man to 40 lashes for using a cloth with Allah’s name on it to clean his kiosk.

  • Tarek Fatah’s Book Shortlisted for Donner Prize

    Chasing a Mirage: The Tragic Illusion of an Islamic State is one of 5 books nominated.

  • Beware of Truth!

    And don’t go in for none of that pesky careful reading, neither.

  • British Islam After Rushdie

    Anshuman Mondal finds generational differences.

  • Gordon Brown Conflates Religion With Morality

    Says markets need morals, then cites various ‘faiths’ as if they had the monopoly.

  • Jesus and Mo Ponder Blasphemy Day

    They have to stick up for the almighty, because the almighty never does. Why is that…?

  • Bishops say Reiki is totally bogus

    Look, if you’re going to use spiritual tools for medial purposes, do it right. It’s just silly to use the wrong kind. Any fule kno that.

    The US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has warned Roman Catholics to shun the eastern healing art of Reiki because it lacks scientific credibility and is dangerous to Christian spiritual health. “Reiki therapy finds no support either in the findings of natural science or in Christian belief,” said the USCCB doctrine committee in a document issued Thursday…”There is a radical difference between Reiki therapy and the healing by divine power in which Christians believe: for Christians the access to divine healing is by prayer to Christ as Lord and Savior, while the essence of Reiki is not a prayer but a technique,” the bishops said in a statement.

    Right. So if you’re a Christian and you have an abscess or cholera or a broken arm, the thing you do is you pray to Christ as Lord and Savior, and that will save you all the trouble and expense of taking medications or wearing a cast. This advice has all the scientific credibility anyone could possibly need; it is well known that prayer has a 100% success rate in the cure of all manner of illness and injury.

    To use Reiki is to operate “in the realm of superstition, the no-man’s-land that is neither faith nor science,” the bishops warned, urging Catholic healthcare institutions, retreats and chaplains to ditch the therapy.

    Catholic healthcare institutions. There are such things? With doctors and medications and all? So they don’t use just prayer then? But I don’t understand – why not? If Christians believe in the healing by divine power, then why do they have sciencey healthcare institutions too? Why do they use both? Isn’t that going against God’s will? If the prayers don’t work, isn’t that because God doesn’t want them to work, for God’s good reasons? So why do Catholics have healthcare institutions?

    I don’t understand this stuff at all. It’s seriously confusing.

  • Chasing a Mirage: The Tragic Illusion of an Islamic State

    People often talk about the Islamic contribution to science, culture and art yet the name of Abu Nawas is more or less forgotten now. Canadian author Tarek Fatah, founder of the secular Muslim Canadian Congress (he has reported the obligatory death threats) paints a vivid picture of this remarkable Muslim artist:

    He was a poet to reckon with and not to be antagonised, for fear of a satirical reprisal that would become the source of amusement and mockery in the marketplace and wherever the nobility sipped fine wine or paid to watch damsels dance to the voices of minstrels.

    The immediate impulse is to compare this long-haired hedonist to a Middle Eastern Oscar Wilde. Although a devout Muslim, Nawas had little time for organised religion. Attending prayers one day, he interrupted the imam’s recital of ‘O ye unbelievers’ with ‘Here I am!’ He was once found in an embrace with a beautiful woman against the holy stone of the Ka’aba. He later walked out of the relationship after the woman ordered him to renounce his homosexuality.

    My comparison with Wilde falls because, while the Irish dramatist was broken on the wheel of Victorian puritanism, Abu Nawas was accepted and respected in his own time. He received mild censure for his irreverence but no real harm: ‘the Basra and Iran of Abu Nawas’ days was a city of tolerance and pluralism.’

    It’s fair to say that if Nawas travelled through time from the Basra of 780 to that of 2009 then his subsequent life expectancy would be measured in days, if not hours.

    The theme Tarek Fatah rages against in his excellent study of an impossible dream is that of the Golden Past contrasted with a Fallen Present. To my knowledge, the earliest recorded instance of this fable appears in the Book of Genesis, with humankind exiled forever from the garden of purity into a decadent and declining present day. The myth runs through most major religions, extremist political philosophies and also, more and more frequently, reactionary mainstream political comment in Western societies. You know the drill. Humanity has lost its spirituality, become seduced by materialism, consumerism, and meaningless sex, with the result that we’re all wandering around dull-eyed and repeating sitcom catchphrases like characters in a Douglas Coupland novel.

    At present the myth of the Great Decline is most dominant in the Muslim world (although we’re catching up). Fatah shows that the Arab world went into technological and cultural deterioration almost at the same moment that the West stormed ahead, as if on a global seesaw. He quotes a UN report confirming that the Islamic world had failed on ‘virtually every measurable human index from education to economy, development and democracy.’ The cause of this decline has been pinned on Jews/Zionists, neocons, secularists, Freemasons and all kinds of sinister conspirators rather than the corrupt Middle Eastern ruling class. How to arrest this decline? Return to the days of the glorious Caliphs!

    Only as so often with the narrative of the Great Decline, the garden never existed in the first place. The middle part of Tarek Fatah’s book is devoted to a fascinating history of Islamic civilisation with specific reference to the caliphs. His conclusion:

    I have sincerely attempted to find the so-called Golden Age of Islam that was free of bloodshed, civil strife, palace intrigues, outright racism, slavery, and pillage. I have failed. From the Ridda (Apostasy) Wars of Caliph Abu-Bakr to the humiliating defeat of Caliph Mustasim, I have not found a single period that I could in all honesty say that I would trade for my twenty-first century existence as a Muslim living in a secular democratic society.

    Which, Fatah stresses, is not to say that the history of Islam is entirely a history of failure and servitude. There were massive contributions to the Enlightenment, to science, philosophy, technology and culture, and productive and cosmopolitan societies that allowed the genius of Abu Nawas and people like him to flourish without fear. But Fatah stresses that these happened despite attempts to establish the caliphate, not because of them.

    Having demolished the past, Fatah goes on to demolish the present. He examines the three nations most seen as having created an Islamic state – Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran – and his findings are damning. Despite great oil wealth, quality of life in these states is extremely poor. The truth is that when it comes to murder, torture, repression, racism, inequality and discrimination, no one oppresses Muslims like Islamists.

    Fatah gives us the interesting case study of the Prophet’s home in Mecca. The Saudi government plans to bulldoze it to erect ‘a parking lot, two fifth-storey hotel towers and seven thirty-five storey apartment blocks’. It’s hard to imagine a worse act of desecration towards the Islamic faith. Yet this blasphemous plan (and there is no other word) has received little condemnation, while the publication of some silly, borderline racist cartoons resulted in international protest and hundreds of deaths.

    Chasing a Mirage exposes the Saudi Islamists’ desire to have it both ways, standing with George Bush at Washington Cathedral after 9/11 while flooding the Western hemisphere with far-right clerics, Islamist propaganda and front organisations. (And people say the Israelis are running the world!) Fatah is also good on sharia banking, which sees a marriage of Islamism and Mammon. The illusion that there is ‘a distinctly Islamic way to build a ship, or defend a territory, or cure an epidemic, or forecast the weather’ gives fundamentalists yet another direct route into Muslim hearts and minds. Fatah comments:

    Dozens of Islamic scholars and imams now serve on sharia boards of the banking industry. If Canada’s TD Bank, BMO and RBC join the league, it will be interesting to see how the ultra-left Trotskyist allies of the Islamists view their partners hobnobbing with the bankers atop Toronto’s TBC tower.

    Fatah emphasises that the Quranic authority for such evils as the death penalty for apostasy, the global jihad and the forced veiling of women is dubious as best. Yet unlike apologists such as Tariq Ramadan, Fatah does not simply leave it at that: he is aware of and challenges how scripture does, in fact, affect the real world. There’s been plenty of verbiage on the possibility of an Islamic reformation but through his courage and his honesty Tarek Fatah gives you the hope that it may actually happen.

    Another Muslim poet quoted in his book is Mirza Ghalib, who in the nineteenth century wrote the following verse:

    Hum ko maaloom hai janat ki haqeeqat lekin,
    Dil ke behelane ko Ghalib ye khayaal accha hai

    [Of course I know there is no such thing as Paradise, but
    To fool oneself, one needs such pleasant thoughts Ghalib]

    It will be a great day when in the Islamic world a Muslim poet can speak such lines, and live.

    Chasing a Mirage: The Tragic Illusion of an Islamic State, Tarek Fatah, John Wiley and Sons 2008

  • New Law in Afghanistan Trashes Women’s Rights

    Shia Family Law legalizes marital rape and child marriage, limits a woman’s right to leave the house.

  • Tauriq Moosa in Defense of Blasphemy

    Why is it okay to insult Odin but not God?

  • The New Yorker Blogs the Stimulus Bill

    A close reading of 407 pages of legislation.

  • 2e Rencontres Laïques Internationales

    Paris April 4-5. Taslima Nasreen, Maryam Namazie, Azar Majedi, Caroline Fourest, many more.

  • NCSE on Science Setback for Texas Schools

    ‘This is a setback for science education in Texas, not a draw, not a victory,’ Eugenie Scott said.