Author: Ophelia Benson

  • Goldacre and Colquhoun Investigate Quack Degrees

    This latest batch of course notes from TVU sound more like religious evangelism than science.

  • Nutritional Fairy Tales from Thames Valley University

    TVU is one of those shameful institutions that offer Bachelor of Science degrees in homeopathy.

  • Frederick Douglass and Randall Terry

    The other day ‘hanmeng’ said in a comment on ‘God-talk as an unstated norm’ that the bible is Obama’s favourite book and later quoted from a keynote address he gave in 2006. The quotation was worrying – especially this bit –

    [W]hat I am suggesting is this – secularists are wrong when they ask believers to leave their religion at the door before entering into the public square. Frederick Douglas[s], Abraham Lincoln, Williams Jennings Bryant [Bryan], Dorothy Day, Martin Luther King – indeed, the majority of great reformers in American history – were not only motivated by faith, but repeatedly used religious language to argue for their cause. So to say that men and women should not inject their “personal morality” into public policy debates is a practical absurdity.

    I was going to dispute that, but reading the whole address I found that Obama did some of the disputing for me. He doesn’t mean what that passage in isolation would seem to indicate that he means.

    Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God’s will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all.

    Well – that’s what I was going to say, and he’s already said it, in the same address, so I don’t need to bother. I had already thought he knew that, must know that, being 1) sensible and 2) a Constitutional scholar; but the quotation worried me. But if all religious people understood and agreed to that principle, we would all have a lot less to worry about.

    I was going to say that it’s all very well to talk about Douglass and King, but they are not the only reformers in American history who were motivated by their religion and use religious language. Fred Phelps and Randall Terry are a couple more; so are throngs of people who opposed everything Douglass and King stood for. It always irritates the bejesus out of me when opponents of secularism cherry-pick their reformers and movements in order to defend the place of religion in politics, as if Christian defenders of slavery and segregation had never existed. I was prepared to give Obama a damn good scolding for doing that, but he doesn’t really do that (although I think he ought to have mentioned the anti-Douglasses, since he brought it up). He doesn’t really do that and, more important, he doesn’t shy away from stating the principle involved.

    Gene Robinson states it too.

    The Anglican church’s first gay bishop and the United States’ first black President-elect discussed in depth the place of religion in the state. Bishop Robinson said: “He and I would agree about the rightful place of religion vis-a-vis the secular state. That is to say, we don’t impose our religious values on the secular state because God said so. Our faith informs our own values and then we take those values into the civil market place, the civil discourse, and then you argue for them based on the Constitution. You don’t say to someone, you must believe this because this is what God believes.”

    Quite.

  • No ordinary moment

    There are (I suppose this was inevitable) some skeptics now claiming that people are rejoicing at Obama’s election because he’s black – which is true in one way but false in another. The way it’s true is probably obvious enough; the way it’s false is that 1) that’s not the only reason and 2) we would have been rejoicing anyway. Obama’s being black is neither necessary nor sufficient for the rejoicing. Here’s why. Suppose a Sarah Palin who was black – identical to Palin in every other way, but black. A very different, much smaller, and much more delusional crowd would be rejoicing. Suppose an Obama who was white – identical to Obama in every other way, but white. We would still be rejoicing – although a huge element of the actual rejoicing would be missing.

    There are some people sneering at the emotionality. Fuck’em. Seriously. I’m as skeptical as the next person, I too like to be cautious with my admiration and respect (let alone affection), I too am aware that sentimentality is risky for clarity of thought. But I do not think this particular example of mass enthusiasm is irrational. It’s emotional, but it’s not irrational.

    It’s funny…I wasn’t really prepared for how emotional it turned out to be. I’m not the only one. I never really allowed myself to imagine what it would be like, because like so many people I was so afraid it wouldn’t happen – I was trying to minimize the disappointment. So when it happened – so abruptly – it was like being knocked down by a wave. What can I tell you? It was no ordinary moment. It just wasn’t, and for so many reasons – not all of which were to do with race.

    It’s interesting that it was very little about race until that moment. That aspect was left mostly in the background (including in coded messages from the opposition, of course) during the campaign, but then the moment the election was announced, that aspect zoomed into the foreground and took over for the evening. Good. The campaign was run on the merits, then once it was over, we could go ahead and celebrate the symbolism. Aided by the echoes of King’s mountaintop speech – not that there was much need for aid.

    What can I tell you? We don’t get many moments like that. I can’t think of any like it. The sneerers can go write condolence cards to Sarah Palin.

  • New Dimensions for American Democracy

    At long last, a protracted and often fierce election campaign is over. America has selected its new president. We congratulate Barack Obama, and we pledge our support for his efforts!

    President-elect Obama will face awesome problems left over from the Bush administration. But let us focus on the positive. Obama is the first person of mixed Anglo-African parentage to attain the presidency. Heroically, he represents a significant extension of the scope of American democracy. His election reminds us that the United States really is the universal society on this planet and reconfirms America’s identity as a truly (if not yet perfectly) multiracial, multi-ethnic, multicultural nation. Bravo!

    The United States is the first major country founded under the ideals of the Enlightenment, committed to the secular values of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” America is a land of opportunity and individual achievement; its civic faith in progress, education, science, humanism, and democratic values is well justified.

    Yet it comes at a price. Almost a century was required to overcome the moral blot of slavery. It has taken another century and a third since the Civil War to make the nation significantly more inclusive. America has elected a biracial president; had the Democratic primaries turned out differently, the nation would most likely have elected a woman. How long will it take before an open nonbeliever can be elected to high office? The U.S. Constitution states that “no religious test shall ever be required” to hold “any office or public trust.” Yet surveys still show that a majority of Americans would not vote for an atheist candidate for president. Clearly there is more work to be done to realize a truly secular society.

    In order that the ideals of democracy may be extended further, we offer some basic, humanistic ethical principles and goals that we hope the nation can achieve in the coming years. Even as they confront an economic crisis of massive proportions, we call on President Obama and the new Congress to base their actions on the following principles:

    • Renewal of regulation for the protection of the public. The unlimited free market has been discredited. Virtually every other democratic society displays a mixed economy with robust public and private sectors. America needs to learn from this example.
    • Universal health care. We view health care as a human right. Every major democracy except the United States has universal health care. While preserving a significant private component, it is time to enact legislation that ensures that every American is covered.
    • The right to privacy. Every person should have the personal freedom to pursue his or her values and style of life, so long as he or she does not prohibit others from exercising like rights
    • Equal access. Every person, regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, or class, should have the opportunity to realize his or her goals without being hampered by discrimination.
    • Equality of concern. All individuals should (a) be considered as equal before the law; (b) have the same right to education, whether poor or rich; and (c) enjoy the opportunity to pursue gainful employment.
    • Civil liberties. In a free and open democratic society, any effort to censor or restrict free expression must be impermissible. This encompasses the right of each individual to believe in and practice a chosen religion—but also the right of dissent and nonbelief.
    • Separation of church and state. The United States needs to adhere to the First Amendment. We call upon President Obama to rise above his campaign rhetoric on this issue and end public support for faith-based charities as a violation of the First Amendment.
    • Commitment to developing alternative energy sources. We need to refocus national policy based on an energy mantra that exhorts us to go green, green, green! in place of drill, drill, drill.
    • Restoring respect for U.S. leadership in world affairs. The war in Iraq needs to be resolved by the new administration as soon as possible. Ideally, this should include some form of truth commission that would investigate key members of the previous administration for their roles in taking the nation to war on false pretenses, establishing an illegal doctrine of preemptive warfare, and instituting such repellent practices as torture and indefinite detention. America should refocus its foreign policy and commit to using first diplomacy rather than military force as it seeks to resolve conflicts peacefully in cooperation with others in the world.

    POSTSCRIPT

    Finally, we recommend two reforms of the electoral system.

    First, the election just concluded consumed two years, tremendous energy, and unprecedented levels of funding. We recommend that a special commission be appointed by the president in consultation with Congress to move beyond the grueling state-by-state primary system, perhaps to regional primaries and a shortened electoral process.

    Second, we recommend that vice-presidential candidates be selected by regional primaries and political conventions, not simply chosen by the presidential nominee. Three twentieth-century presidents died in office (William McKinley, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and John F. Kennedy) and were succeeded by their vice presidents. Although we think that Obama’s selection of Joseph Biden was a sensible choice, John McCain’s selection of the unqualified Sarah Palin was not. Clearly the present process is insufficient. In our view, the vice president should be selected by the public through the primary process rather than being the sole and autocratic choice of the candidate. Let the people decide!

  • John McWhorter Says Skip the Glum Thoughts

    ‘Our job as serious people is to always contest. We must always Speak Truth to Power.’

  • Alan Wolfe on an End to the Culture War

    The culture war was a replay of earlier conflicts between black and white.

  • Denmark May Boycott Durban II

    Unless OIC removes proposal to equate criticism of religion with racism, Denmark will not attend.

  • Full Text of Obama’s Grant Park Speech

    If this financial crisis taught us anything, it’s that we cannot have a thriving Wall Street while Main Street suffers.

  • Prop 8 Passes in California

    But Washington state voted to allow doctor-assisted suicide for terminally ill people.

  • U.S. Airstrike Reported to Hit Afghan Wedding

    Afghan officials said the strike killed 40 civilians and wounded 28 others in Kandahar Province.

  • International Reaction to Obama

    America’s choice of such a skillful straddler of global identities cannot help but transform the nation’s image.

  • Why It Was Somewhat Emotional

    ‘It was a day most never imagined that they would live to see.’

  • The Republican Glossary


    Usage

    My friends

    Energizing the base (1)

    Energizing the base (2)

    Gaffe

    Straight talk

    Palling around with terrorists

    Health care

    Charismatic

    Ready to be president

    Underestimating Sarah Palin

    Joe Six-pack

    Joe the plumber

    Maverick

    Real American Hero

    “Tested”

    Energy policy

    Environment

    Elite

    Change (real)

    Reaching across the aisle

    Economic policy

    Race card

    Real America

    Socialist

    Bold new vision

    Pit bull

    Feminist

    Socialist

    Second Amendment Rights

    Surge

    Strong on foreign policy

    Strong on security

    Early voting

    Definition

    Rabble
    Inciting to riot
    Wink and wave
    Inadvertant Straight talk
    scripted comment
    Conversation with Mensa members
    Tea
    Draws breath

    Charismatic
    Listening to Sarah Palin
    One of my friends
    Joe Six-pack’s dumber brother
    Unbranded range animal
    Shot down over Nam
    Anger issues
    Drill baby drill
    What we see when we breathe
    Other people’s cocktail parties
    What to do with a subject
    Present in Senate chamber
    “The Bush Tax Cuts”
    The one up my sleeve
    Where my friends live
    Other people’s neighborhoods
    New eyeglass prescription; tea
    What lives under Joe Sixpack’s trailer
    Hockey mom with pregnant teenager
    Hockey mom on unemployment

    Dead timberwolf mother
    Mop and bucket
    Can’t locate Iran on a map

    Foreign policy overrated anyway

    Lottery

  • Vatican-Muslim Summit in Rome

    Vatican-Atheist summit and Muslim-Atheist summit not scheduled.

  • Aisha Ibrahim Duhulow Begged for Mercy

    Court authorities claim she ‘wanted Sharia law and the deserved punishment to apply.’ Witnesses say otherwise.

  • Exciting New Dutch Blasphemy Law

    Will protect people from ‘indirect insult’ on the basis of religion or ‘conviction’ – so nearly everything could be illegal.

  • Gallery Attacked Over ‘Insulting’ Art

    Windows at the SaLon Gallery were smashed after abusive phone calls about the images.