All entries by this author

David Irving Sentenced to Three Years in Prison *

Feb 21st, 2006 | Filed by

Deborah Lipstadt dismayed. ‘The way of fighting Holocaust deniers is with history and with truth.’… Read the rest



Distortions Are Not Worth Debating

Feb 21st, 2006 | By Deborah Lipstadt

Deborah Lipstadt looks at the decision by the editors of the student newspaper of Northwestern University, The Daily Northwestern, to publish an article by Arthur Butz.

Things at Northwestern seem to be going from bad to worse. Electrical Engineering Professor Arthur Butz has, after many years of total obscurity in anything but the world of Holocaust deniers, once again grabbed headlines by praising Iranian President Ahmadinejad for his Holocaust denial. Mr. Butz has as much expertise on the history of the Holocaust as I do on building bridges. But he has tenure and this means that, as long as he does not introduce this false information into his classroom, he cannot be fired.

But Butz is an old story. … Read the rest



Why Truth Does Matter

Feb 21st, 2006 | By Ophelia Benson and Jeremy Stangroom

From Why Truth Matters by Ophelia Benson and Jeremy Stangroom, Continuum 2006, pp. 18-20.

But does it really matter? Is it worth bothering about? Academic fashions come and go. Dons and professors are always coming up with some New Big Thing, and then getting old and doddering off to the great library in the sky, while new dons and professors hatch new big things, some more and some less silly than others. Casaubon had his key to all mythologies, Derrida had his, someone will have a new one tomorrow; what of it.

Yes, is our answer; it does matter. It matters for various pragmatic, instrumental reasons. Meera Nanda discusses in Prophets Facing Backward the way Hindu fundamentalists in India have … Read the rest



Which Vulnerable Minority?

Feb 20th, 2006 5:05 pm | By

Yes, what about that Francesca Klug article. It’s worse than some of the more obviously woolly commentary, because its subtlety makes it that much more persuasive. But she starts from a very dubious premise, and sticks with it throughout – without it she has no case. She starts from the assumption that the Danish cartoons ‘denigrate’ not the prophet M, but Muslims themselves. But – if that’s true, then why isn’t that what all the shouting is about? Has she not noticed that the shouting is in fact about something else? Does she think that’s just displacement or a smokescreen? Well, if so, she needs to say so, and say why. She doesn’t.

While some [of the cartoons] seem

Read the rest


Norman Levitt Considers Steve Fuller *

Feb 20th, 2006 | Filed by

‘In Fuller’s mind, working scientists are in an important sense intellectually deformed.’… Read the rest



Pseudoscience and The Occult in Public Schools *

Feb 20th, 2006 | Filed by

‘Medical Qigong’ taught as science in California charter school.… Read the rest



AAAS Issues Statement Against ‘the Wedge’ *

Feb 20th, 2006 | Filed by

Veiled attempts to wedge religion into science classrooms are a disservice to students, teachers.… Read the rest



Blackmore and Midgley Discuss Memes *

Feb 20th, 2006 | Filed by

Midgley seems to miss the point rather…… Read the rest



Inept Review of Dennett’s Breaking the Spell *

Feb 20th, 2006 | Filed by

Leon Wieseltier defends ‘thoughtful believers’ and other familiar totems.… Read the rest



We Ought to Pay Closer Attention *

Feb 20th, 2006 | Filed by

We need to remember how freedom is lost, and what it is like to live where it has been lost.… Read the rest



Why Review a Book When You Can Sneer?

Feb 20th, 2006 | By Brian Leiter

The New York Times has done it again: they’ve enlisted an ignorant reviewer to review a philosophical book. The reviewer is Leon Wieseltier, the literary editor at The New Republic. The book is Daniel Dennett’s latest book, a “naturalistic” account of religious belief. Whatever Mr. Wieseltier knows about philosophy or science, he effectively conceals in this review. The sneering starts at the beginning:

The question of the place of science in human life is not a scientific question. It is a philosophical question. Scientism, the view that science can explain all human conditions and expressions, mental as well as physical, is a superstition, one of the dominant superstitions of our day; and it is not an insult

Read the rest


The Anatomy of Lunacy

Feb 19th, 2006 6:27 pm | By

Allow me to explain. I’m a little vague about the way the RSS feed works, on account of I don’t have it myself. I forgot (or perhaps never knew, despite having been told) that people who subscribe to the RSS feed get the whole N&C – I mistily thought they (you) got a notification, rather than the thing itself. Jeremy reminded me of how it actually works and said that it’s normal practice when making a big change to put a time on it, so that it doesn’t look as if I’m cluelessly trying to sneak a change in when the RSS makes that impossible. I deleted two paragraphs yesterday and substituted a much shorter one, saying ‘oh look, I’m … Read the rest



Sing it, Deeyah

Feb 19th, 2006 5:30 pm | By

Oh, really; how pretty. How perfectly lovely.

A Muslim pop singer has been forced to hire bodyguards to protect her during a visit to Britain next month after she received a string of death threats from religious extremists. US-based Deeyah is due in London next month to promote a new single and video, released tomorrow. But the track “What Will It Be?” has already outraged hardline Islamists here as it promotes women’s rights.

Yes, well, you can see why that would outrage people, promoting women’s rights. Women can’t, shouldn’t, mustn’t have any rights, because the whole point, or almost the whole point, of hardline Islamism is to take rights away from women. Take that away and what’s left? Okay, … Read the rest



MP Ann Cryer: Imams Should be Aware of Rights *

Feb 19th, 2006 | Filed by

Says all imams should be made aware of how women are treated in the UK before being allowed in.… Read the rest



Fanatics Tell Deeyah: We’ll Kill You *

Feb 19th, 2006 | Filed by

Track that promotes women’s rights has outraged hardline Islamists. Men spit at her in the street.… Read the rest



Poll: 40% of Muslims Want Sharia in UK *

Feb 19th, 2006 | Filed by

40% of British Muslims surveyed backed introducing sharia in parts of Britain, 41% opposed it.… Read the rest



Gilbert and George Don’t Take on the Theocrats *

Feb 19th, 2006 | Filed by

Fear of being murdered is a perfectly rational one, but it is eating away at cultural elite’s myths.… Read the rest



Annoyed Iranians Re-name Danish Pastries *

Feb 19th, 2006 | Filed by

Now called ‘Roses of the Prophet Muhammad’ peace be upon his apple filling.… Read the rest



Sixteen People Killed in Nigerian Cartoon Protests *

Feb 19th, 2006 | Filed by

Witnesses said most of the dead were from Maiduguri’s minority Christians. … Read the rest



Not Too Sweet

Feb 18th, 2006 7:35 pm | By

The book has arrived, and the result was an immediate and dramatic improvement in the weather. So that’s the end of that tedious story, at last.

But this piece brought a little of my colour back, even before I opened the mailbox at midday (the post comes late around here).

Among those who decline to show the caricatures, only one, the Boston Phoenix, has been forthright enough to admit that its editors made the decision “out of fear of retaliation from the international brotherhood of radical and bloodthirsty Islamists who seek to impose their will on those who do not believe as they do. This is, frankly, our primary reason for not publishing any of the images in question.

Read the rest