All entries by this author

Comment Parler des Livres que l’on n’a pas Lus *

Feb 10th, 2007 | Filed by

That’s how to talk about books you haven’t read. Answer: pretentiously, of course.… Read the rest



Norman Levitt on Anti-science Right and Left *

Feb 10th, 2007 | Filed by

The Bush version is far more dangerous than the postmodernist version – but there is overlap.… Read the rest



Portugal Considers Legal Abortion *

Feb 10th, 2007 | Filed by

Women can be sent to prison for up to three years for having an abortion.… Read the rest



Head Defends Epithet-laced Textbook *

Feb 10th, 2007 | Filed by

‘The school is owned, funded and run by the government of Saudi Arabia’ and located in Acton.… Read the rest



Buruma again

Feb 10th, 2007 9:36 am | By

More on Buruma. Because after another, slower reading I think the disagreement is not so elusive or subtle after all. There are some things he says that I disagree with quite strongly – though there are other places where it’s the implications of what he says (whether he’s aware of them or not) that I disagree with.

For instance, I wasn’t decided enough about that concluding sentence: ‘A free-spirited citizen does not tolerate different customs or cultures because he thinks they are wonderful, but because he believes in freedom.’ That’s a terrible assertion, because it is so wide open; it could mean anything. ‘Different customs or cultures’ could mean any damn thing, including the most awful tortures and oppressions. … Read the rest



Spell it out

Feb 9th, 2007 12:52 pm | By

John Carter Wood has a different take on Kelek, Buruma and the rest. He thinks Bruckner did a hatchet job on IB and TGA. Maybe so, but I have more reservations about their replies to Bruckner than John does. They’re somewhat elusive reservations though…a matter of sensing, or thinking I sense, implications, of fitting statements into an existing context where they seem to me to take on a significance they wouldn’t have without the context. See what I mean? Elusive stuff. I wonder if I can pin any of it down…

Try Buruma.

Having turned from devout Islamism to atheism, she tends to see religion, and Islam in particular, as the root of all evils, especially of the

Read the rest


Is it Criticism, Racism, or ‘Islamophobia’? *

Feb 9th, 2007 | Filed by

Eliot Weinberger announced nominees for book award and said one had engaged in ‘racism as criticism.’… Read the rest



Scott McLemee Talks to Danny Postel *

Feb 9th, 2007 | Filed by

Desire to avoid saying things that could be useful to the neocons is understandable, also a cop-out.… Read the rest



Irshad Manji on What Makes an Apartheid State *

Feb 9th, 2007 | Filed by

Human rights organizations operating openly? A free press? An independent judiciary?… Read the rest



James Randi on Sylvia Browne *

Feb 9th, 2007 | Filed by

And an…interesting former FBI agent.… Read the rest



Used to be axiomatic among progressives

Feb 8th, 2007 1:53 pm | By

Oliver Kamm coments on that interview David Thompson did with your humble windbag the other day. I know, that was a week ago, but I get behind in these things – deadlines, you know. He wonders about that thing I wondered about and probably Johann wondered about and possibly Jerry wondered about and maybe some other people – people who liked Why Truth Matters for instance – wondered about. What’s a liberal neocon? Who is one?

He says something very good, too, in reply to an inanity from good old ‘Islamophobiawatch:

The only editorial amendment I would make to your headline would be to enclose the word “Islamophobia” in inverted commas, as I have just done. The notion that this

Read the rest


Farther into the swamp of cultural relativism

Feb 8th, 2007 1:35 pm | By

Those German-Turkish women rock. Necla Kelek tells Ian Buruma what’s what.

Reading his response to Pascal Bruckner’s essay “Enlightenment fundamentalism or racism of the anti-racists?” one is tempted to say to Ian Buruma, “If only you had kept quiet!” He clearly felt himself caught out, and despite his insistence to the contrary, his reply only leads him further into the swamp of cultural relativism…Ash and Buruma are quite typical in their argumentation, and virtually exemplary in their politically dubious cultural relativism…[Buruma] maintains that one cannot make generalised statements about Islam, as Ayaan Hirsi Ali does. That is a rather astonishing statement from a man who is…a professor of democracy and human rights.

Astonishing but, as Kelek says, all too typical. … Read the rest



Nigel Warburton Interviews Julian Baggini *

Feb 8th, 2007 | Filed by

Thought experiments help clarify and stimulate our thinking, but rarely, if ever, actually prove anything.… Read the rest



Necla Kelek Replies to Ian Buruma *

Feb 8th, 2007 | Filed by

He says one cannot make generalised statements about Islam; astonishing from a professor of human rights.… Read the rest



Mixing Up Ontology and Epistemology Again *

Feb 8th, 2007 | Filed by

Yes, there is a reality out there; no, there is no ready-made truth of things. Keep up.… Read the rest



Charlie Hebdo Editor Defends Publication *

Feb 8th, 2007 | Filed by

Editor Philippe Var told the Paris court the cartoons were criticising ‘ideas, not people.’… Read the rest



Meghnad Desai: Islam or Islamism? *

Feb 8th, 2007 | Filed by

‘The roots of this new terrorism are not in religion but in a political ideology which uses religious language.’… Read the rest



Charlie Hebdo Trial ‘Under Anti-racism Laws’ *

Feb 8th, 2007 | Filed by

Organisations suing for ‘public insults against a group of people because they belong to a religion.’… Read the rest



Communities Secretary Notices a Problem *

Feb 8th, 2007 | Filed by

‘Government has relied too much on engagement with traditional leadership organisations.’… Read the rest



Is Morality Hard-wired? *

Feb 8th, 2007 | Filed by

Marc Hauser and other researchers do experiments to find out.… Read the rest