All entries by this author

Jihad in 1857 *

Oct 30th, 2006 | Filed by

Educated Delhi Muslims rejected the west and the gentle Sufi traditions of late Mughal emperors.… Read the rest



Romano on Young-Bruehl on Why Arendt Matters *

Oct 30th, 2006 | Filed by

Hint: ‘the banality of evil’ is not all.… Read the rest



Review of The God Delusion *

Oct 30th, 2006 | Filed by

Perceptive recognition of excess respect for religious beliefs, regardless of content.… Read the rest



Christopher Shea on Reading Nafisi at Columbia *

Oct 30th, 2006 | Filed by

Some observers question the intellectual merit of the brand of literary criticism Dabashi practices.… Read the rest



Freud’s Perjuries as ‘Spots on the Sun’

Oct 30th, 2006 | By Frank Cioffi

The following is a condensed extract from an essay titled “Are Freud’s Critics Scurrilous?”, translated and published in Le livre noir de la psychoanalyse (Editions des Arènes).

Sigmund Freud may have been a great man but he was not an honourable one. Freud’s claims to greatness rest on his imaginative and expressive powers; his dishonour arises from his leadership of a movement in whose interests he perjured himself repeatedly.
The most striking fact about responses to documentation of Freud’s perjuries is how often they take the form not of denial but of extenuation.

‘ONCE UPON A TIME THERE WAS A GIRL CALLED ANNA O.’

Here is one example of how this is done. Freud repeatedly put forward as a demonstration … Read the rest



Reclaiming your head

Oct 29th, 2006 10:59 pm | By

Here’s a great listen for you – Julia Sweeney on Fresh Air. She’s got a one-woman show called ‘Letting Go of God’ at an off-off-Broadway theater, and she gives a pretty good run-through of the journey from theism to atheism in this interview. In fact it’s pretty hilarious what a lot she manages to get into thirty minutes or so – religion as consolation in despair, Bible study, Abraham and Isaac, perverse excuses for Abraham and Isaac, a wink-wink priest who explains that we sophisticated believers know better but myths are for the people, the anger and sense of treachery at being told that, withdrawal from the church, turn to New Age, in particular Deepak Chopra, being stimulated by … Read the rest



Bishop Cross at ‘Appeasement’ of Homosexuality *

Oct 29th, 2006 | Filed by

Fellow bishops not pleased with ‘rogue bishop.’… Read the rest



The Nose Stud Case *

Oct 29th, 2006 | Filed by

Schoolgirls and religious clothing an issue in Durban, too.… Read the rest



Woman Burned in Bus Torching in Marseille *

Oct 29th, 2006 | Filed by

High unemployment, discrimination, youth alienation from mainstream society cited.… Read the rest



Tired of Endless Religious Babble? *

Oct 29th, 2006 | Filed by

‘Let’s stop describing these tax-funded establishments as faith schools. They are superstition schools.’… Read the rest



Atheists Top Book Charts by Teasing Deity *

Oct 29th, 2006 | Filed by

Publishers eager to replicate success of Russell’s Why I Am Not a Christian.… Read the rest



Misogyny rules ok

Oct 28th, 2006 6:13 pm | By

All this kind of thing is useful in a way. A way one wishes we didn’t need things to be useful, but useful all the same. Useful in the sense of being an extreme and conspicuous form of a pervasive bad thing that one wishes were not there at all, so not useful in any ultimate sense, not inherently desirable; quite the contrary; but useful in educational terms; useful in making clear what we’re up against. Useful, to spell it out, in making it clear how deep misogyny really does go. It goes so deep that a lot of people think women have exactly two choices: lifelong confinement to a room, or deserved rape followed by stoning to death. It … Read the rest



The line was busy

Oct 28th, 2006 5:47 pm | By

This is quite funny. It’s from an article on Alan Johnson’s U-turn on quotas for ‘faith’ schools.

The Guardian yesterday attempted unsuccessfully to contact Tahir Allam, an education spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain. Earlier he told Radio 4″s Today programme: “This assumption that faith schools are divisive is a false one because there is no evidence to support this.”

Actually I think that’s downright hilarious. The Guardian is so eager to check in with the MCB, and to be seen to check in with the MCB, that it even lets us know about its failed attempts. What – did it think we would be annoyed and ‘offended’ if it wrote a story on government policy on ‘faith’ … Read the rest



Nicaragua Declares Women Expendable *

Oct 28th, 2006 | Filed by

Nicaragua votes in new abortion ban, even in cases where the mother’s life is at risk.… Read the rest



Murderous New Abortion Ban in Nicaragua *

Oct 28th, 2006 | Filed by

Women’s rights groups in Nicaragua plan to file an injunction to stop a new law banning all abortions.… Read the rest



Hitchens Interviewed *

Oct 28th, 2006 | Filed by

‘It’s very important to these people that they still have their oppositionalist credentials. I think it’s narcissistic.’… Read the rest



Double Sids is Rare but so is Double Murder *

Oct 28th, 2006 | Filed by

Ben Goldacre notes a well documented piece of flawed reasoning known as ‘prosecutor’s fallacy.’… Read the rest



Mass resistance is the other side of mass oppression

Oct 28th, 2006 | By Azar Majedi

In describing women’s conditions in a particular country, one refers either to laws governing that country or to statistics. In this manner, one either exposes the extent of the oppression women suffer, or admires their achievements. With respect to women living under the rule of Islam, it is pure discrimination and oppression, subjugation and state violence. If women are considered second class citizens in many countries, in Islam-ridden countries they are not even considered citizens. They are extensions of men. In fact, according to Islam, the concept of citizen is non-existent. There is a relation between God and religious hierarchy and a collective of right-less, conscious-less men, with women as their slaves. As a matter of fact this is true … Read the rest



Getting the message

Oct 27th, 2006 7:56 pm | By

Sheik Hilali clarifies things.

Australia is a multicultural society. Whoever wants to, let them take their clothes off. Whoever wants to go naked, let them go naked. Whoever wants to get drunk, let them get drunk. Whoever wants to smoke hashish, let them smoke hashish. It’s a free country, it’s none of our business. But it is our right to tell our women (that they dress appropriately).

And, presumably, that they stay home and stay in their room, since that’s what he said the first time. So anyway – who’s the ‘our’ in that sentence? Who is the ‘we’ who get to tell ‘our’ women what to do? Men, of course. It always is. ‘We’ are people and ‘we’ … Read the rest



The Mufti Wasn’t Kidding, Psychiatrist Notes *

Oct 27th, 2006 | Filed by

‘The mufti meant exactly what he said, and those views are widely held,’ says Tanveer Ahmed.… Read the rest