There’s a very particular difficulty with holding Trump to account, that is probably more acute than with most crooks. Just Security explains:
To prove that Trump criminally obstructed the electoral count proceeding, prosecutors would need to convince a 12-person jury that he acted “corruptly.” According to the D.C. courts, this means that “the defendant must use unlawful means or act with an unlawful purpose, or both” to obstruct the proceeding. In addition, the “defendant must … act with consciousness of wrongdoing,” which is defined as acting “with an understanding or awareness that what the person is doing is wrong” (emphasis added).
You can see where this is going to go.
… Read the restIn other words, it is not enough
