Orders

Nov 20th, 2025 9:48 am | By

Trump plays yet another round of No YOU are.

Trump has accused a group of Democratic lawmakers who served in military or intelligence roles of “seditious behaviour” over a video they made telling those currently serving that they must refuse illegal orders. “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform on Thursday.

No Don. They get to do that. You on the other hand do not get to issue illegal orders.

“This is really bad, and Dangerous to our Country. Their words cannot be allowed to stand. SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR FROM TRAITORS!!! LOCK THEM UP???”

Thank you for asking. No.

Six Democrats on Capitol Hill, led by senator Elissa Slotkin, on Tuesday released a video saying that Americans’ trust in their military is at risk, accusing the Trump administration of “pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens”. The Democrats told active-duty troops and those in the intelligence community that they “can” and “must refuse illegal orders”.

Which is true. Does “Lieutenant Calley” ring a bell?



To roll back

Nov 20th, 2025 7:05 am | By

We want more extinctions, not fewer. Stamp out those species!!

The Trump administration presented a new plan to roll back regulations in the Endangered Species Act (ESA) on Wednesday, a move experts fear will accelerate the extinction crisis if adopted.

The proposed changes would allow the federal government more power to weigh economic impact against habitat designations, remove safeguards against future events – including the impacts from the climate crisis – and rescind the “blanket rule” that automatically grants threatened species the same protections as those designated as endangered.

Under the plan, newly listed animals and plants could face years without protections as details in tailored regulations are ironed out, delays that would only be exacerbated by the deep cuts to staffing at agencies charged with the work. The definition for “critical habitat” would also be narrowed, excluding areas that species don’t currently occupy, even if it was once considered their habitat.

The proposal is one of many attempts Donald Trump has made to dismantle critical wildlife protections in order to boost energy extraction and industrial access, even in the most sensitive and vulnerable wilderness areas across the US.

Does wildlife vote for Trump? Does wildlife give Trump money? Does wildlife try to overthrow the government on Trump’s behalf? No? Well then.

The proposal comes amid an extinction emergency, as the climate crisis adds new challenges to recovery for scores of species already close to the brink. Roughly 1m species are threatened with extinction, according to a 2019 assessment from the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), including roughly 40% of amphibians, and a third of reef-forming corals, marine mammals and sharks. Insects, considered the bedrock to biodiversity and the foundation of most ecosystems on Earth, are in rapid decline. About 80% of insect species have yet to be identified and some are disappearing before they can be named.

Impacts to habitat can threaten a broader network of interconnected species and ecosystems. Landscape modification can trigger a devastating domino effect, where the loss of one species leads to the extinction of others that depend on it.

Blah blah blah. Does habitat put money in Trump’s pocket? Do species protect Trump from the law? No? Well then.



Let’s put it off for another decade or two

Nov 19th, 2025 4:58 pm | By

Trans people could be banned from single-sex spaces based on how they look

And?

It’s not as if before 2010 or so there were guards at the doors of every public single-sex space demanding to see our papers. That’s why men who were determined to spy on women in the toilet were often able to get away with it, and it’s also why they could face charges if they didn’t run fast enough. It was an imperfect system but it was certainly better than this one where we have to welcome men in our changing rooms and potties. We know what they look like, don’t worry.

The guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) was handed to ministers almost three months ago but has so far not been published by Bridget Phillipson, the minister for women and equalities.

The Times has been passed a copy of the final guidance, which aims to preserve the dignity and safety of women, by Whitehall figures who are concerned that Labour is deliberately delaying publication to avoid a potential political backlash.

Or to maintain their cred as tranz alliez and avoid being shouted at.

Councils, NHS trusts and businesses are still allowing trans women — men who identify as women — to use single-sex spaces despite a Supreme Court ruling in April that for the purposes of the Equality Act, sex is defined by biology, not gender identity.

They say they are waiting for the new guidance before taking action, despite warnings that they may be breaking the law.

Guidance shmuidance. Remember what we did before? Do that. See how easy?

Under the new guidance, places such as hospital wards, gyms and leisure centres will be able to question transgender women over whether they should be using single-sex services based on how they look, their behaviour or concerns raised by others.

Well duh. If they can’t, then the FWS ruling is useless and might as well not have happened.



New broom

Nov 19th, 2025 4:07 pm | By

Huh. Even BBCers don’t like the BBC.

The Tim Davie-appointed director of BBC Sport has been warned of “very low” staff morale amid suggestions his controversial reforms are breaching employment law.

Complaints were shared with Alex Kay-Jelski after he sent an internal memo saying those unhappy with change, and their options, could seek voluntary redundancy.

Aka if you don’t like it here you know where the door is.

A recent email to staff from Kay-Jelski that mentioned redundancies alongside options including training and extra support has further unnerved staff. “If the thought of more change is something that concerns you or you feel the direction we’re heading in is not the right fit for you, please have an open conversation with your line manager or Catherine Littler in HR to discuss all available options, including potential voluntary redundancy,” wrote Kay-Jelski, who arrived as director of sport last year.

Aka if you don’t like it here you can always leave.

It’s not a subtle message.



The pursuit of fairness

Nov 19th, 2025 11:03 am | By

Oliver Brown talks to Sharron Davies:

For a decade, Davies has been preoccupied with the pursuit of fairness on a different front, becoming a relentless advocate for women’s right to their own category in sport. Where the International Olympic Committee (IOC) was seduced by the activist fallacy of “trans women are women”, Davies had no qualms about pointing out that they were, in fact, men, using the immutable advantages of male physiology to deprive female athletes of records and titles. It has often felt a lonely fight, with many governing bodies more inclined to appease militant trans lobbyists than to protect half the population.

And, to expand on the point, with many governing bodies more inclined to bully and blame and demonize women than to accept that women have rights.

At 63, a mother-of-three and grandmother-of-two, she is in no mood to ease off in her quest. Which is why, today, alongside round-the-world yachtswoman Tracy Edwards, she is launching the Women’s Sports Union, a foundation that will specifically target sports still failing to ensure fairness for women at all levels, suing them if necessary.

“We realised that we couldn’t just keep verbally lobbying,” she explains. “We needed to create an umbrella organisation that people could join and donate to, so that we could go down a legal route. What we would like it to be in the future is a voice for women’s sport.”

The star power behind the union is formidable, with Olympic legend Daley Thompson, boxing’s Barry McGuigan and Judy Murray, tennis’s ultimate tiger mother, all joining the advisory board. Davies has enlisted lawyers to work pro bono, emphasising: “Lawfare is not off the table.”

There are still 34 sports in Britain – including swimming, gymnastics and ice skating – that continue to let males into their grassroots female competitions according to their self-declared “gender identity”. It is this type of schism – restricting the female category at elite level to biological females only but leaving mass-participation sport as a free-for-all – that, they argue, the Supreme Court verdict should have stopped. But many sports say they are waiting for “guidance” before implementing change across the board.

Guidance shmidance! Men are not women: there’s your guidance. Do the right thing.

She’s not a fan of the IOC. It failed to do anything about the East Germans’ doping, which cost her the gold, and now it’s failing to do anything about men invading women’s sports.

It was the IOC who gave Manfred Ewald, mastermind of the East German scheme, its highest award, the Olympic Order, in 1985. And it was the IOC who, only last year in Paris, presided over one of the bleakest scandals in Olympic history, allowing Algeria’s Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-ting of Taiwan to sweep to gold in women’s boxing, despite the fact that previous sex tests had indicated male chromosomes. Italy’s Angela Carini withdrew from her bout against Khelif after just 46 seconds, claiming she had never been punched so hard in her life. “I am here for gold,” the Algerian told the BBC. “I will fight anybody, I will fight them all.”

“I’m astonished that the IOC survived what happened last summer, because to me, that was almost criminal negligence,” Davies says. “I think, for the last 10 years, we’ve been waiting for a woman to be paralysed or killed.”

She reveals that this perspective was far from popular at the BBC, for whom she has worked at 13 Olympic Games as a poolside interviewer. She continues to juggle her broadcast duties alongside her online personal fitness company and her increasingly demanding campaign work. “I was warned several times about my tweeting on Khelif, even though it was factual.”

The corporation has come under sustained fire in recent days over its coverage of these issues, with The Telegraph revealing internal staff messages that raised concerns over several years about the number of BBC “puff pieces” on biological males in female sport, with little or no balancing coverage of the women affected.

She was incandescent that Alex Kay-Jelski, the BBC director of sport, had written a 2019 article for The Times dismissing Davies and nine-time Wimbledon champion Martina Navratilova as “not experts” on the subject, suggesting her views were tantamount to saying, “Don’t let black men in the same shops as you or they’ll rape your women”. Davies was married for six years to sprinter Derek Redmond, the son of Caribbean immigrants, and had two children with him. They divorced in 2000.

I’d be incandescent and beyond. How extremely disgusting.

“It was absolutely ludicrous, and I did call him up on it,” she says. “I told Tim Davie, the director-general [who resigned last week] that if he didn’t apologise, I would sue him. We got an assurance at the time that, in future, he would leave his politics at the door.

“To try to imply that I was racist, that this was the same as a situation involving a black person? My daughter’s black. How stupid and ignorant was that? There are a large number of activists in the BBC, imposing trans ideology, language and agendas.”

And kicking women in the teeth every chance they get.



Things happen

Nov 19th, 2025 7:22 am | By

Trump angrily rebukes journalist for being mean to the nice murdering Saudi bigwig sitting next to him.



It’s not about the digital innovation

Nov 18th, 2025 5:35 pm | By

Occupy Democrats reports:

NPR scores massive victory against Trump — CPB FORCED to restore $36 million deal after judge shreds their excuse.

Donald Trump’s crusade to kneecap public media just suffered a massive legal humiliation — and it’s one that exposes the breathtaking corruption behind his attempts to silence reporters who refuse to bow to him.

On Monday, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting quietly crawled back to court and agreed to revive a $36 million contract with NPR — the very contract it killed after intense pressure from the Trump White House.

This reversal didn’t happen because CPB suddenly rediscovered its mission. It happened because a federal judge all but laughed CPB’s defense out of the courtroom.

Judge Randolph Moss told CPB lawyers point-blank: their story wasn’t credible. Their excuse? That they suddenly dumped NPR to “foster digital innovation.”

Sure. Totally normal to discover a passion for innovation the day after a top Trump official told them not to “do business with NPR.”

The truth spilled out in depositions: CPB’s board chair and executives met with a White House budget officer who openly declared her “intense dislike for NPR.” And within 48 hours, CPB reversed a decades-long partnership — clearly terrified of a president hell-bent on censoring journalists who report facts he doesn’t like.

I have to say, I don’t like NPR either – but that’s not because I think it’s too lefty. It’s because I think it’s too goopy, too touchy-feely, too dumbed down, too convinced that we’re all a bit childish. I went off it years ago. If it were too lefty I would like it a lot more; it’s the sentimentality and the slushy language I got sick of.

But if the alternative is a Trump version? Then long live NPR!



A thycling influenther

Nov 18th, 2025 5:13 pm | By

BBC still banging the same stupid drum. Bang stupid drum, win stupid prizes.

A cycling influencer nominated for a list of top 100 women cyclists said she has declined the honour due to the decision not to include trans women.

Oh yay, good for her, how very plucky and brave and stand your ground-y. Women are such greedy sluts; of course they shouldn’t have prizes just for them.

Cycling UK, a charity promoting the sport, has compiled its 100 Women in Cycling list for the last nine years, but this year decided only to include biological women following the recent unanimous UK Supreme Court ruling defining a “woman” and “sex” in law.

Claire Sharpe, a cycling guide and coach from Bristol, said: “If they don’t want to ride with all women, then it’s not the kind of ride I want to be part of”.

They do want to ride with all women; they don’t want to ride with men. See the difference?

Ms Sharpe said she is one of four Bristol riders who have declined to feature in the ranking.

Speaking to BBC Bristol, Ms Sharpe said: “[The list] was originally set up to celebrate women who inspire, encourage and empower people to experience the joy of cycling.”

Check; to celebrate women who do that. Not people in general, not women and men, but women. Specifically women.

“By excluding trans and non-binary people, it’s just not doing what I think it was set up to do. It excludes people that have helped create the community that I was nominated for.”

But it’s a thing for women. We’re allowed to do things that are for women.

They’re exploiting an ambiguity in the word. Exclusion can mean unreasonable cruel “we hate you” action but it can also be entirely morally neutral. Researchers working on disease X exclude people who don’t have disease X because they’re working on disease X. Not all exclusion is “You’re not invited to my birthday party because we all hate you and you’re ugly.” Much exclusion is like excluding whipped cream as a building material. It’s not that whipped cream is being punished, it’s just that whipped cream is unstable in hurricanes.

This is like that. A list of top women cyclists is a list of top women cyclists. There is no need to include fish or hammers or the BBC or the space station. That’s not an aspersion on fish or hammers or the BBC or the space station, it’s just having a list that is what it says on the tin.



When in doubt consult Jeff

Nov 18th, 2025 10:00 am | By

Larry “women are stupid” Summers is back in the news.

When former Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers was pursuing a romantic relationship with a woman he described as a mentee, he sought guidance from a longtime associate: convicted sex offender Jeffrey E. Epstein.

In a sequence of texts and emails between November 2018 and July 5, 2019, Summers turned to Epstein for advice on his pursuit of the woman. Epstein was quick to chime in with assurance and suggestions, describing himself in one November 2018 message as Summers’ “wing man.”

How cute and amusing.

Wednesday’s documents also revealed messages where Summers, whose speculation that innate differences between men and women could drive women’s underrepresentation in science contributed to the end of his Harvard presidency in 2006, joked about women’s intelligence and what he described as excessive penalties for men who “hit on” women in the workplace.

In an October 2017 email to Epstein, Summers retread the same terrain that had proven treacherous for him in the past, writing that he “observed that half the IQ in world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent of population….”

Haw haw haw – where would we be without men sharing jokes about how stupid women are with their bro friends?



Extra pomp

Nov 18th, 2025 9:21 am | By
Extra pomp

Trump is making an extra special big splash fuss over Mr Saudi Arabia. Bros before hos.

Trump rolled out an elaborate welcome at the White House for Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, who is seeking stealth fighter jets, security assurances and economic promises from the United States.

The arrival ceremony exceeded the typical pomp for a visiting foreign leader: A Marine band played as officers on horseback carried the Saudi and American flags, and advanced fighter jets flew over the White House in a V formation. Mr. Trump greeted Prince Mohammed with a handshake and gave him a pat on the back before they headed inside.

They’re very compatible.

Who wants a great big hug?



Multiple active projects

Nov 18th, 2025 5:38 am | By
Multiple active projects

Dirty dirty dirty.

When Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman visits Washington on Tuesday, President Donald Trump will yet again find himself face-to-face with the ruler of a country where he and his family have immense personal business at stake.

The Trump Organization has multiple active projects in Saudi Arabia, including Trump Towers in both Jeddah and Riyadh. And on the eve of bin Salman’s visit, the Trump Organization announced plans a new project with their Saudi-linked development partners, Dar Global, in the Maldives set to open in 2028.

Last month, the Trump Organization also announced plans for a Trump Plaza to be built in Saudi Arabia, complete with “a vibrant green spine inspired by Central Park that brings Manhattan-style vibrancy to the heart of Jeddah.”

It’s almost as if he feels a special attraction to Saudi Arabia. Is it the contempt for women that draws him?

The crown prince’s visit represents just the latest intersection of America’s foreign affairs and the president’s personal fortune. The Trump Organization has also brokered licensing deals in several nearby Gulf states, including in Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, with an apartment complex slated to open in 2026 featuring what has been marketed as the world’s biggest outdoor pool.

But it’s not the money, it’s the mindset.

In an interview with Arab News last December at the launch event for the Trump Tower in Jeddah, Eric Trump said projects in Saudi Arabia and around the Gulf would continue to attract the Trump Organization, citing the region’s “uplifting” mindset.

Right.



Just a small sample

Nov 17th, 2025 4:39 pm | By

The NY Times has a great big long piece on the demolition of the Justice Department. Depressing and enraging but crucial reading.

President Trump’s second term has brought a period of turmoil and controversy unlike any in the history of the Justice Department. Trump and his appointees have blasted through the walls designed to protect the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agency from political influence; they have directed the course of criminal investigations, openly flouted ethics rules and caused a breakdown of institutional culture. To date, more than 200 career attorneys have been fired, and thousands more have resigned. (The Justice Department says many of them have been replaced.)

But guess what: the ones who have been fired or quit are free to talk. Some are talking.

Beginning with Trump’s first day in office, the lawyers narrated the events that most alarmed them over the next 10 months. They described being asked to drop cases for political reasons, to find evidence for flimsy investigations and to take positions in court they thought had no legitimate basis. They also talked about the work they and their colleagues were told to abandon — investigations of terrorist plots, corruption and white-collar fraud.

Why the veto on investigations of terrorist plots? Trump might be involved?

Mike Romano, Jan. 6 prosecutor: Anyone who spent any time working on Jan. 6 cases saw how violent a day that was. I’d spent four years living with that day, the things done to people. It’s incredibly demoralizing to see something you worked on for four years wiped away by a lie — I mean the idea that prosecution of the rioters was a grave national injustice. We had strong evidence against every person we prosecuted. And I knew that if they’re going to wipe all of that away based on a lie, either I’ll be fired as retaliation or pretext or asked to do something unethical. Or both.

Until that point, I’d hoped the second Trump term would be similar to the first one, or similar enough for a while. Then the pardons came down and I knew, in light of that, there is no way I can stay.

Prosecutor, Capitol Siege Section: It was inconceivable to me they’d fire people for no reason except they’d worked on cases that were now disfavored. People like me, who are career attorneys, work within a structure. We don’t have much latitude. To be told that you are being punished for your decisions, when you were following guidance created by very talented and skilled prosecutors above you, which judges blessed for the most part — it’s completely bizarre. It flipped the culture of the institution. It’s a culture now of fear. And they are losing people all the time, very good people, who were the future of the department.

Pam Bondi, another former Trump defense lawyer, was sworn in as attorney general. She issued a first-day flurry of 14 memos that radically redefined the department’s mission. One mandated that government attorneys “zealously defend” the president’s agenda, no longer giving them the latitude to decline to sign a brief or appear in court because of a personal judgment about a case — a longstanding practice in the department. Another pulled back on enforcing the Foreign Agents Registration Act, a watchdog law that requires people to disclose when they’re working for international powers.

Dirty and sinister enough yet?



Rooky error

Nov 17th, 2025 10:41 am | By

Good old trans epistemology.

Poor pathetic dopes. Right there in the first paragraph they confuse some people thinking something with established fact. Yes of course “the majority of trans people” think [insert noun here] is hostile to them because that’s the sum total of trans thinking – everybody is hostile to them and they are the most persecuted ever. That’s all they have. It’s their version of The Meaning of Life. Everybody hates us, nobody loves us, we’re gonna go eat worms.

The fact that trans people think that does not make it true. I know that’s a frightfully sophisticated thought – that people can think something that’s not true – but nevertheless it’s a fact, and it’s a useful thing to keep in mind. Opinion does not invariably line up exactly with the truth.

The YouGov poll, commissioned by the Good Law Project and based on a representative sample of 457 trans adults, shows that 70% of trans people find BBC News coverage hostile.

Ah the Good Law Project. Well there you go then. The GLP is funded by people who see everyone and everything as hostile to trans people, so surveying them about it is going to turn up very predictable results.



To request the indictment be tossed

Nov 17th, 2025 10:07 am | By

In Comey news:

A federal magistrate judge on Monday raised the possibility that the criminal indictment against former FBI director James Comey on charges of lying to Congress — which was obtained at the behest of President Donald Trump — could soon be dismissed.

The suggestion by Judge William Fitzpatrick came as he ordered the Department of Justice to release all grand jury material related to Comey’s case to him by the end of the day.

Comey’s defense lawyers had requested that material in order to request the indictment be tossed based on alleged irregularities by interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan when she presented the case to the grand jury and asked it to charge him.

Fitzpatrick said Halligan had potentially violated court orders and Comey’s Fourth Amendment rights, which “establish a reasonable basis to question whether the government’s conduct was willful or in reckless disregard of the law.”

Any bets? Do we think it’s unlikely that Trump’s minions bungled?

Hahahahahaha what a silly question.

The judge said he “is finding that the government’s actions in this case — whether purposeful, reckless or negligent — raise genuine issues of misconduct.”

The judge said that he recognized that ordering the DOJ to release to Comey all material related to the grand jury that indicted him, as well as an audio recording of the proceedings, is “an extraordinary remedy.”

“But given the factually based challenges the defense has raised to the government’s conduct and the prospect that government misconduct may have tainted the grand jury proceedings, disclosure of grand jury materials under these unique circumstances is necessary to fully protect the rights of the accused,” Fitzpatrick wrote.

We await developments.



Beyond

Nov 17th, 2025 9:40 am | By

She did this months ago but I somehow missed it. Godalmighty.



Balance the scales

Nov 17th, 2025 6:47 am | By

Classic Trump.

Trump on Sunday brushed aside concerns about conservative commentator Tucker Carlson‘s recent interview with a far-right activist known for his antisemitic views, which has caused a schism within the Republican party. Trump defended Carlson, saying the former Fox News host has “said good things about me over the years.”

Bahahahahaha that’s all it takes. Tucker Carlson has said good things about Trump ergo Tucker Carlson is a Perfect Human.



No man ever

Nov 16th, 2025 4:25 pm | By

If “progressives” would look up from their sobbing over Our Trans Siblings for one minute maybe they would manage to notice this kind of casual contempt for women.

Clear enough? “Look at this dumb bitch telling us about her PhD when the whole point of her is that she’s HOT.”


Insult to injury

Nov 16th, 2025 4:10 pm | By

NHS wants to yammer about trans people to the exclusion of everything else, ok?

Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust has applied to alternately fly a Progress Pride flag and Transgender Pride flag from the roof of its building on the banks of the Thames.

In an “advertisement consent application” submitted to Lambeth council, the trust proposes hanging the flags from the sole flagpole on the North Wing, which looks out on Parliament.

Looks out on Parliament from directly across the river. It’s not a massively wide river.

But that’s a relatively trivial point. What I want to know is why so many people are so obsessed with “Pride” and especially its rude demanding selfish offspring Trans Everything. Why does the NHS want to shout about Pride n Trans and not about women or workers or other targets of injustice and neglect? Why are people who fancy themselves peak enlightened so zoomed in on this one demographic at the expense of all the others???

The letter was signed off by an apprentice town planner who, according to his LinkedIn page, left sixth form college last year.

In other words he’s younger and less educated than university students, let alone graduates. He’s just out of high school.

The new planning application is seeking consent for the flags to be flown until November 2030.

In its covering letter, the application cites consideration of the London Plan 2021 laid out by Sir Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, for the development of the capital.

This includes the championing of “inclusive design”, where development proposals are encouraged to take into account London’s diverse population.

By yammering about trans people, and trans people, and also trans people, and in addition trans people, and I mustn’t forget to mention trans people.

Susan Smith, from For Women Scotland, which is behind the Supreme Court case on gender, said the flags had come to represent a resistance to the law as clarified in April.

She told The Telegraph: “These flags will send the message that those who understand biological and legal reality are not welcome in the hospital and will no doubt terrify women who will have grounds to fear that their right to a single-sex service or ward will not be respected.”

And in addition they will rub women’s noses in the fact that women just don’t matter to people who consider themselves progressive and enlightened.

Earlier this year, in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling that under the Equality Act trans women are not legally women, the trust sought to reassure staff of its “unwavering commitment to supporting people of all gender identities and gender expression”.

Not a peep about supporting women of course. Bah. Women don’t need support – women are the evil oppressors.

St Thomas’ said the flags would only be flown on designated days and that only one would fly at any one time.

A spokesman added: “As a healthcare provider, we strive to ensure everyone is treated with dignity and respect.”

No you don’t. That’s just an ass-covering lie. By slobbering all over the trans communinny this way you’re treating women with disgust and contempt.

When will these idiots wake up?



Bro doesn’t get it

Nov 16th, 2025 12:18 pm | By

Sigh. Alan Cumming interview.

I mention how Twitter/X amplifies hate speech. Cumming, who once told Harry Potter producers to “f*** off” during negotiations for the role of Prof Gilderoy Lockhart (eventually played by Kenneth Branagh), has opinions on the views pushed by JK Rowling about trans people. “I thought feminism was about equality,” he says. “Women being equal with everyone else in society. And yet it appears…”

He focuses his thoughts. “I’ve kind of moved away from being obsessed with the horror of things that have come out of that quarter, of trans rights being perceived as anti-women’s rights. But there’s several things that stick out to me – and I don’t want to get into a battle at all with her, because I feel that the best way to deal with her is to give her less attention.”

What are “trans rights”?

Some purported trans rights are anti-women’s rights. The ones that allow men to take prizes and jobs and refuges that were intended for women, for instance.

“But there was a thing,” he continues, “where she very kindly gave money to open a rape crisis centre in Edinburgh – a great thing to do. I mean, bravo. But then she said that trans women were not allowed… That’s transphobia. At the worst and the most awful time a person could experience, you’re saying, ‘No, I’m not going to help you, because you are trans.’ I just feel like we have to call it what it is.”

Men are not allowed in rape crisis centres intended for women. If Alan Cumming wants to open rape crisis centres for trans women or trans people he should do that thing, but women need rape crisis centers that don’t include men. The issue is not that they’re trans, the issue is that they’re men.

It’s really not that difficult.



Notice the snake

Nov 16th, 2025 8:57 am | By

I can’t find any news coverage on this so it will have to be a twitter summary.

On November 15, 2025, Governor Maura Healey appointed Giselle Byrd, a Black transgender woman and executive director of the Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition, to the Massachusetts Commission on the Status of Women, alongside 14 other new commissioners. The commission, established in 1965, advises on gender equity policies to combat discrimination and expand opportunities for women and girls in the state. Byrd’s expertise in transgender rights and HIV prevention for marginalized communities supports the state’s inclusive approach, though the appointment has sparked online backlash from conservatives and support from LGBTQ+ advocates.

Oh shut up, twitter. It is NOT only conservatives who object to being “inclusive” of men in commissions on the status of women. Men who pretend to be women do not belong on a Commission on the Status of Women.

https://twitter.com/EricLDaugh/status/1989860151889633409

The man, of course, is the absurdly gaudy hyper-“feminine” one with the flowing locks of hair and the dagger-like hot pink fingernails and at least four items of heavy gaudy jewelry and the tight sexy dress. The man is the parody. It is insulting to include him on the commission instead of an actual woman.