Oh my god. Seriously?

CNN:

Pete Hegseth’s surprise gathering of hundreds of generals and admirals in Virginia next week is being called so he can describe the administration’s reinvention of the Department of Defense as the “Department of War” and outline new standards for military personnel, according to half a dozen people familiar with the planning.

Are you SERIOUS???

He could do that with technology. There is no reason to gather them all in one room as if it were 1820.

It is reckless, expensive, pointless, grotesque, dangerous, boneheaded to gather them all in one room, so Pete from the television gathers them all in one room.

It’s as if the planet is slowly but steadily forming itself into a plank and we’re all going to be forced to walk it, not over a period of decades but all at once.

“It’s meant to be a show of force of what the new military now looks like under the president,” a White House official told CNN.

The meeting is expected to resemble “a pep rally” where Hegseth will underscore the importance of the “warrior ethos” and outline a new vision for the US military, said three of the sources. He is expected to discuss new readiness, fitness and grooming standards the officers are expected to adhere to and enforce.

Grooming?????

All that money and time and risk to scream at them about how they cut their hair?????

“It’s about getting the horses into the stable and whipping them into shape,” said a defense official familiar with the planning. “And the guys with the stars on their shoulders make for a better audience from an optics standpoint. This is a showcase for Hegseth to tell them: get on board, or potentially have your career shortened.”

Excuse me, defense official, but Hegseth doesn’t need a “showcase” at a cost of however many millions it will take to stuff all the brass from all over the planet into one room.

Hegseth’s team is planning on recording his speech and releasing it publicly later, three of the sources said, and the White House is planning to amplify it, the White House official said.

As of Friday, there were no plans for Hegseth to make a major national security-related announcement as part of the meeting, all of the sources said, making it even more surprising that he has ordered the officers to attend in person and leave their posts for what will essentially be a major speech.

To put it much much much too mildly.

The original idea for the unprecedented gathering of generals and admirals was Hegseth’s, the White House official and one of the sources familiar with the planning said. Hegseth later let the White House know about the plans, but Trump himself knew very little about the details when he was asked about it in the Oval Office on Thursday, the White House official said.

The hundreds of generals and flag officers who were invited were also not told why they were ordered to drop everything and travel to Virginia, CNN has reported. One of the sources, a defense official, told CNN that it has been made very clear to the general and flag officers summoned by Hegseth that if they can’t attend, they will need to provide an extremely good reason for their absence.

Ah well there’s a hint at why he’s doing this. It’s because he can. It’s because he’s a jumped-up little shit who can’t believe his luck in getting to scream at people who are better than he is. “Annn I made them all come back annn I didn’t let them say no, Daddy!!”

Unbelievable.

Timothy Snyder writes:

My historian colleagues might correct me, but I do not think anyone at least in recent history has done what Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is about to do: put all of the American generals and admirals from around the world into a single room (next week, in Virginia) just to say something to them.

There is no practical reason to do this: he has easier and more secure ways to communicate with the commanders. And there are obvious risks: the entire armed forces of the United States, spread around the world, will be without its leaders. Given that the government could well shut down the next day, the separation of commanders from their command might be indefinite.

And if Hegseth has his way, those generals and admirals will all be in one site, announced in advance, which means that the entirety of the American command structure will be more vulnerable, physically, than in any conceivable military scenario, including nuclear war. There is no scenario other than this one in which they would all be in the same place at the same time.

First thing I thought and then said yesterday when I saw the headlines. That’s not how this works. You never put all the top brass in one place, let alone doing that with noisy public fanfare. Is Trump just telling his whole crew to find out what the usual procedure is and then do the opposite? Across the board? Without any thought about why it’s the usual procedure?

So why might Secretary Hegseth do such an extraordinary thing? Only four solutions to the puzzle come to mind.

1. He has some trivial thing to say and does not understand the risks.
2. He wishes to endanger the lives of the generals and admirals.
3. He will stage a purge, perhaps involving a loyalty oath or something similar that requires personal presence.
4. He will tell the commanders that henceforth their assignment will be to oppress American citizens (“homeland defense”). This could be combined with the third scenario: those who refuse will be fired.

The first one doesn’t make any sense even in Trumper terms. If it’s trivial they wouldn’t blow all that money to get everyone in the same physical room. And really even having something important to say still doesn’t make any sense, for the same reason. Communication doesn’t require physical proximity these days so it can’t be that.

Maybe the idea is that the something to say is so profound and urgent and important that it has to be in person, so that the Magic can have its full effect. Can they be that dumb? Oh yes.

On the other hand Hegseth’s previous job was saying stuff on tv, which is the opposite of saying it in person, so is it likely that he thinks you can’t get a point across unless you’re in te Real Presence?

I think the closest is 3. I suspect it’s an all hands meeting to hear the message that Trump is never to be questioned or disobeyed, and it has to be in person because that’s more intimidating.

Except, is it? Really? In this case? Some dork from Fox News laying down the law to every single top brass person in the military? They don’t get there by being either stupid or weak, I’m guessing.

Whatever it is, it isn’t good.

Peak crazy.

Registered sex offender Richard Cox was back in an Arlington, Virginia, courtroom Thursday for a lengthy preliminary hearing.

Cox is accused of exposing himself to multiple women and children in Arlington Public Schools’ girls’ locker rooms. Those facilities have pools that are open to the public outside of school hours.

A dozen witnesses testified in the preliminary hearing for the Cox case, including women who said they saw him naked in the women’s locker rooms in Arlington County‘s Wakefield High School, Washington Liberty High School, and Barcroft Sports and Fitness Center.

One witness said when she and her five-year-old daughter went into the girls’ locker room after swim class, Cox – who identifies as a woman but is still physically male – was standing naked in a shower stall with the curtain open, touching himself.

Aka masturbating. Yes that’s definitely something you want a five-year-old girl to see. It’s definitely fine to force that sight onto non-consenting women and girls including girls as young as 5. Nothing wrong with that at all. He is being his Whole Self. He is living his womanhood.

On another occasion, a woman and her five and six-year-old daughters were at Barcroft Sports and Fitness Center for a gymnastics class, and when they went into the girls’ locker room, Cox was in there naked.

Arlington County and Arlington Public Schools allow people to use locker rooms and bathrooms of their choice based on their chosen gender identity, and they allowed Cox to use the women’s locker rooms.

Because the revolting sleazy man is all-important and his female victims are so much incidental trash by the side of the road.

Arlington County and Arlington Public Schools allow people to use locker rooms and bathrooms of their choice based on their chosen gender identity, and they allowed Cox to use the women’s locker rooms. A 17-year-old lifeguard who worked at one of the Arlington pools said she witnessed Cox naked in a school locker room, as did other women who testified.

In court Thursday morning, Cox repeatedly insisted he is a woman, and insisted the judge order the prosecutor to stop misgendering him and to use female pronouns.

And a pony.

David Frum says the monster will devour all of us if we let him.

The charges against Comey are not just about the president’s abuse of his power for personal retribution. They represent a test of the president’s plans for the future.

Since the assassination of Charlie Kirk, Trump and his top aides have spoken of their plans to bring cases against people who give money to anti-Trump causes. “My administration will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it, as well as those who go after our judges, law enforcement officials, and everyone else who brings order to our country,” Trump said on September 10.

In real life, there is no known evidence that any organization funded Kirk’s assassin. But there are donors to left-wing causes that Trump wants to defund. In the White House today, the president signed an order to investigate those donors. He cited the liberal donors Reid Hoffman and George Soros as potential targets. In April, Trump ordered an investigation of ActBlue, the Democratic fundraising platform.

I somehow missed the moment where it became illegal to be to the left of donaldtrump.

Trump faces a very immediate problem. He and his family have already amassed an enormous fortune in the first nine months of his second term, in great part from gifts and deals with foreign powers. That behavior is likely to be investigated if Trump’s party loses control of either house of Congress in November 2026. Trump’s bad economic management has put that control at extreme risk. His overall approval numbers have dropped to the very low 40s; his economic management, to the mid-30s. Grocery prices are up, and electricity prices are rising even faster. If honest congressional elections were held today, the Republicans’ two-seat margin in the House of Representatives would vanish. The protective screens for Trump’s self-enrichment would vanish with it.

So his move on Comey, Frum explains, is “another step in a forward-looking plot to shred the rule of law in order to pervert the next election and protect his corruption from accountability.”

It’s remarkable how much a person can achieve by having no scruples of any kind.

Maggie Haberman on Trump’s Revenge:

In the span of a few hours on Thursday, President Trump went from claiming no knowledge of a possible indictment of the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey to celebrating it as “JUSTICE IN AMERICA!” In reality, Mr. Trump had handpicked the prosecutor — previously one of his own personal lawyers — in an effort to ensure it happened.

It was a landmark moment in Mr. Trump’s retribution campaign, one that put on full display the relentlessness of his efforts to use the criminal justice system to get back at those he feels persecuted him. 

…

Throughout his first term, Mr. Trump — under investigation himself for possible ties between his 2016 presidential campaign and Russians seeking to influence the outcome of the race — sought to instigate investigations into his perceived enemies.

Mr. Trump’s zeal prompted his White House counsel at the time, Donald F. McGahn II, to write a memo explaining what the president could and could not do. “Strong constitutional norms of nonpolitical law enforcement should also guide your decision making and may caution against involvement in a specific matter,” Mr. McGahn wrote.

Yeah, Mr. McGahn might as well have written a poem in Urdu. Trump does not understand the words “constitutional” and “norms” and “should” and “nonpolitical” and “caution”.

In his second term, backed by a new cast of advisers who say he has the ability to direct investigations, Mr. Trump has abandoned any pretense of adhering to such advice. He publicly pressed his attorney general for the prosecution of Mr. Comey and other foes, fired a federal prosecutor who balked at carrying out his will, and installed an ally to do his bidding over the objections of career prosecutors who concluded the evidence against Mr. Comey was too weak to warrant charging him.

In short he is doing what dictators do and no one is stopping him.

Mr. Comey was high on Mr. Trump’s list of retribution targets, but the list is long.

Mr. Trump also has sought mortgage fraud charges against Letitia James, the New York attorney general, who successfully brought a civil fraud case against Mr. Trump and his company.

Mr. Trump may now put more pressure on his prosecutors to charge Ms. James, as well as Senator Adam B. Schiff, Democrat of California, who while serving in the House was a leading force in investigating Mr. Trump.

The prosecutors should quit or force Trump to fire them rather than obey. I’m not holding my breath.

Getting an indictment is relatively easy for prosecutors, who have a lot of sway over grand juries. Winning at trial is much harder, and in the Comey case, many factors could make it challenging for the government to secure a conviction.

Line prosecutors in Virginia who had initially reviewed the evidence in the Comey case put in a memo why they thought the effort to convict him was too weak to take to court. The grand jury on Thursday rejected one of the three counts presented to it. And Mr. Trump’s string of invective about Mr. Comey and his repeated references to his own criminal cases provide a lot of evidence for possible defense motions about a vindictive prosecution.

Still, Mr. Trump has always understood that even absent a conviction, defendants face a reputational cost in a criminal case, not to mention the financial penalty in the form of legal bills.

In short he’s already won and he will win more as the case proceeds even if Comey is acquitted in the end.

Busy day in Trump world. Summoning all the military top brass for a meeting, and now indicting Comey.

Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted by a federal grand jury, an extraordinary escalation in President Donald Trump’s effort to prosecute his political enemies.

Comey, a longtime adversary of the president, is now the first senior government official to face federal charges in one of Trump’s largest grievances: the 2016 investigation into whether his first presidential campaign colluded with Russia. He has been charged with giving false statements and obstruction of a congressional proceeding, the Justice Department said in a statement.

Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a post on X, “No one is above the law.”

Oh really? Your boss is.

At the White House Thursday, Trump said, “They’re going to make a determination. I’m not making that determination. I think I’d be allowed to get involved if I want, but I don’t really choose to do so.”

He’s not “allowed to get involved” in the sense that the norms and rules and laws permit him to get involved, but of course he means no one would have the guts to stop him, so if he decides to, he will. That’s where we are. He does whatever he can get away with, and that means pretty much anything he decides to do, because nobody who can stop him is willing to stop him.

Robert Reich did a public Facebook post yesterday that I find intensely annoying.

Friends,

I can’t tell you exactly how I know but after sixty years in and around politics I’ve developed a sixth sense, and my sixth sense tells me the tide is now turning on Trump.

This past week did it.

On Monday, he sued the Times in a lawsuit that, as CNN put it, read “like a pro-Trump op-ed, with page after page of gushing praise for the president.”

On Tuesday, he accused reporter Jonathan Karl and his employer, ABC News, of engaging in hate speech against him, and warned that Pam Bondi, the attorney general, might go after them.

And so on for each day of the week – Trump did bad damaging things.

On Sunday, at the memorial service for Charlie Kirk, he said that he disagreed with Kirk’s supposed leniency toward his ideological foes, adding: “I hate my opponent, and I don’t want the best for them.”

You could almost feel the great sleeping giant of America open an eye and frown, then blink both eyes and sit up and stretch, and then roar “what the hell is going on here?”

Oh give me a break. Maybe he could, but like hell the rest of us could. I couldn’t feel any such damn thing, and I’m pretty confident that no such damn thing happened. Metaphors are fun but this is serious business.

According to Strength in Numbers, the Disney boycott quickly became four times as large as any boycott over the last five years.

Disney’s stock dipped about 3.5 percent and continued to trade lower in subsequent days — a loss in market value amounting to some $4 billion.

Even Ted Cruz — Ted Cruz! — began issuing grave warnings about censorship.

By then the giant was roaring and stomping.

No it wasn’t! Much of the giant just loves what Trump is doing. Robert Reich’s magic intuition isn’t going to change that.

I’m old enough to have witnessed the great sleeping giant of America awaken before.

…

It roared again after tens of thousands of young Americans were killed in the jungles of Vietnam, finally bringing to an end one of the nation’s costliest, deadliest, and stupidest wars.

It roared again at Richard Nixon after Nixon was heard on tape plotting the coverup of Watergate — then being forced to exit the White House by helicopter on his way back to California.

It is starting to roar again now — at the sociopathic occupant of the Oval Office who won’t tolerate criticism, who in one wild week revealed his utter contempt for the freedom of Americans to criticize him, to write or speak negatively about him, even to joke about him.

Maybe I’m being too optimistic, but I’ve seen a lot. I know the signs. The sleeping giant always remains asleep until some venality becomes so noxious, some action so disrespectful of the common good, some brutality so noisy, that he has no choice but to awaken.

And when he does, the good sense of the American people causes him to put an end to whatever it was that awakened him.

What do you think?

I think it’s ridiculous.

Good god. This is deranged, and reckless, and outright dangerous. We’re in a car driven by suicidal lunatics.

Hundreds of US generals and admirals around the globe have been called to Virginia for a meeting with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth next Tuesday, several US officials told CNN, though the reason for the meeting is unclear.

What?

Fox News personality orders top military brass to gather in one place and does not make the order a secret. What could possibly go wrong?

The meeting is expected to be held at the military installation in Quantico, Virginia, multiple officials said, adding that no one seems to know what the meeting is about, including the general and flag officers themselves, or why it was suddenly added to the calendar.

One source familiar said they’d heard theories ranging from a group physical fitness test, to receiving a briefing on the state of the Defense Department, to a mass firing of officers, but regardless of the reason the sudden convening of so many senior military officers is highly unusual.

Surely for obvious reasons.

Some officials also voiced security concerns about having so many high-ranking officers in one place at the same time. A congressional aide told CNN that unless Hegseth planned to announce “a major new military campaign or a complete overhaul of the military command structure, I can’t imagine a good reason for this.”

Or even then. He could announce things to all the high-ranking officers remotely, so what can possibly be the point of ordering them all to gather in one spot like kindergarteners after recess?

The meeting comes as the Trump administration has fired a slew of high-profile general and flag officers since taking office in January, in many instances due to Hegseth’s campaign against diversity-related issues, but often also for unspecified reasons. Hegseth also ordered the Defense Department in May to cut the number of four-star generals and admirals by at least 20%.

Putin must be pissing himself laughing.

Before taking on the role of defense secretary, Hegseth repeatedly voiced disdain for much of the military’s currently serving general and flag officer corps. In a podcast appearance last summer, Hegseth said a third of the military’s senior officers are “actively complicit” in what he argued is a move towards politicization of the military. In a second podcast, he said senior officers are “playing by all the wrong rules” to cater to “idealogues in Washington, DC.”

Well he must know what he’s talking about because…um…remind me why?

Throwing a pinch of Stalin into the mix:

Prosecutors are expected to ask a grand jury to indict former FBI Director James Comey in the Eastern District of Virginia in the coming days, two sources briefed on the matter told Reuters on Wednesday.

The exact charges remained unclear, and it was uncertain whether the grand jury would return an indictment against one of Trump’s longtime political antagonists.

There’s nothing to indict him for, but Trump has ordered them to come up with something.

One of the sources said some prosecutors within the Eastern District of Virginia have presented new U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan with a memo explaining why charges should not be filed, saying the case lacked evidence to show probable cause that a crime was committed.

Evidence shmevidence. Trump said to indict him so indict him! That’s an order, Corporal!

Trump, in a social media post on Saturday, urged Attorney General Pam Bondi to bring charges against Comey and other political rivals of Trump, including U.S. Senator Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Trump chided Bondi for not moving fast enough to bring criminal charges against his most prominent antagonists, saying “JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW.”

Which is very much something presidents are not allowed to do, but Trump don’t care.

Well, he’s not wrong.

The slogan “trans women are women” is scientifically false and harms the rights of women, Richard Dawkins has said.

It’s silly that that’s even news. What are trans women? Men who say they are women. Of course it’s false – scientifically and otherwise – to say that men are women. It’s false and it’s absurd. It’s like saying elephants are rabbits or houses are airplanes.

In The War on Science, Dawkins joins several scientists and philosophers contending that academic freedom and truth in universities was being stifled by diversity, equity and inclusion policies that promoted falsehoods under the banner of social justice.

“I draw the line at the belligerent slogan ‘trans women are women’ because it is scientifically false,” he said. “When taken literally, it can infringe the rights of other people, especially women.

“It logically entails the right to enter women’s sporting events, women’s changing rooms, women’s prisons and so on. So powerful has this postmodern counter-factualism become, that newspapers refer to ‘her penis’ as a matter of unremarked routine.”

…

At London Pride demonstration in 2023, Sarah Jane Barker, previously Alan Barker, told a crowd, “If you see a Terf punch them in the fucking face.”

Dawkins said: “I don’t think I’m unduly guilty of sexist stereotyping if I say such language is more typical of the sex that ‘Sarah Jane’ claims to have left than the other she aspires to join.”

Well I use such language all the fucking time, and ain’t I a woman?

Another entry for the President Baby file.

Trump has added a “Presidential Walk of Fame” to the exterior of the White House, featuring portraits of each of the previous commanders-in-chief – except for one.

Instead of a headshot of Joe Biden, the Republican incumbent instead placed a photo of an autopen signing the Democrat’s name – a reference to Trump’s frequent allegation that the former president was addled by the end of his term in office and not really the one making decisions.

The snub is the latest attempt by Trump to delegitimise a predecessor he routinely belittles, including in front of more than 100 world leaders on Tuesday at the UN general assembly gathering. Trump has never acknowledged his own defeat to Biden in the 2020 election, instead falsely chalking up the outcome to voter fraud.

It’s not a snub. A snub would have been omitting Biden. It’s an insult or taunt or stupid childish bit of mockery.

H/t Acolyte of Sagan

Dang. Talk about going out of your way to insult and dismiss women.

Chris Northwood is a man.

“This prize acknowledged an exceptional woman in Cllr Chris Northwood. The message it sends to women members and voters is that the Liberal Democrats honour and value all of our women members.”

And what they mean by that, of course, is that the Liberal Democrats honour and value men who pretend to be women and have nothing but contempt for actual women.

I really don’t get it. After all this time, I still don’t get it. Why would people who label themselves liberals and democrats carefully deliberately calculatedly insult women by bestowing a women’s prize on a man? After all, giving a women’s prize to a woman wouldn’t do any harm to men who pretend to be women. It’s not as if women are not even eligible for a women’s prize. There are still far more women than there are trans women. There’s no real reason to give a women’s prize to a man other than deliberately saying “Fuck you, bitches.” Why do liberal democrats want to do that?

I don’t get it. I suppose I never will.

Sorry, kid, no dice.

Nope.

Julie Burchill in the Spectator:

‘I was born to play Lady Bracknell,’ Stephen Fry swanked recently, in an interview to mark a new production of The Importance of Being Earnest, running until January. I can’t be the only one to greet the idea of another round of Fry interviews with a desire to go to bed and not come out till it’s all over. But that would be a long hibernation. For Stephen Fry pronouncements are like professional tennis; it’s always open season.

You can’t get away from the clown, particularly when he’s lecturing women on how they should feel about having great hairy men in mascara sharing their private spaces. Magnificently, J.K. Rowling denied they had ever been friends after Fry came out with a more-in-sorrow-than-in-anger lecture about how his previously amiable alleged-mate had been ‘radicalised’ by evil Terfs and had become a ‘lost cause’. Then there was the time we had to listen to him threatening to leave a private members’ club that didn’t admit women – after having been a member for decades under these conditions ‘Oopsie!’ as Fry himself might exclaim, if in Adorably Awks Mode.

…

Maybe I was spoiled by seeing Maggie Smith play Lady Bracknell as a youngster. But surely all can see there’s something off about Fry wearing comedy breasts; it’s a wonder that it took the crass old fraud so long. I can’t help thinking – nay, hoping – that Fry has gone too far this time, and that in his over-reach will reveal himself as the grasping, shallow sell-out that he is. That is, the type of person that Oscar Wilde thoroughly loathed. It may well be true that ‘to love oneself is the beginning of a lifelong romance’ – but surely the love story between Stephen Fry and himself has delighted us long enough.

He was a perfect Jeeves. Other than that…

Obama is stealing Trump’s thunder.

Barack Obama has said Donald Trump’s claims linking paracetamol to autism in infants is “violence against the truth” that could harm pregnant women if they were too scared to take pain relief.

Obama, who was being interviewed by David Olusoga at the O2 Arena, told the audience that Trump’s claims about paracetamol – branded as Tylenol in the US – had been “continuously disproved” and posed a danger to public health.

“We have the spectacle of my successor in the Oval Office making broad claims around certain drugs and autism that have been continuously disproved,” he said. “It undermines public health … that can do harm to women.”

That “my successor” is a dig. He was there first and Trump can’t change that. He’s not all that, he’s just Obama’s successor.

Obama argued there was a “tug of war” between two visions for the future of the US and humanity. On one side the progressive view where change came through democracy, the other driven by populists including Trump wanting a return to an older, more conservative worldview.

He said: “My successor has not been particularly shy about it. That desire is to go back to a very particular way of thinking about America, where ‘we, the people’, is just some people, not all people. And where there are some pretty clear hierarchies in terms of status and who ranks where.”

Brainless crooks from Queens are at the top. Everything else is just flotsam.

Originally a comment by Sackbut on The point is.

This topic brings to mind a number of things that are related in my mind, if not in anyone else’s.

JK Rowling was verbally attacked and threatened. People talking about it seemed frequently to say “I don’t care for her writing, I didn’t like Harry Potter, but…”

Harvard University was attacked by Trump and his lackeys, and the university resisted doing what was demanded, under threat of restrictions and reduced funding. Many people seemed to find it necessary to say, “Harvard has all these problems, I disagree with what they were doing, but…”

Jimmy Kimmel was recently (temporarily) pushed off the air. People found it necessary to say “He’s not funny, but…”

There is nothing whatsoever wrong with criticizing Kirk’s statements and expressed views, or the writing of Harry Potter, or the actions of Harvard, or the comedy of Kimmel. There seems to be some unspoken assumption, though, that if you defend XYZ you must therefore like XYZ, so people take pains to clarify, right then and there, at the moment of expressing defense, that this is not the case. Maybe that kind of assumption is widespread, and so must be countered immediately. Or perhaps the fact that XYZ is currently noteworthy means all topics about XYZ are equally noteworthy right now. I don’t know. Sometimes these discussions about XYZ feel like two valid conversations that don’t really need to happen at the same time, but that’s just the way I think about things. Many other people merge topics together that to me seem better separated. I get in trouble with that all the time.

Ah yes, Trump has “learned more” and “changed his position.” Trump has not however learned to stfu when he doesn’t know what he’s talking about, which is always.

President Trump on Tuesday shifted his position on whether Ukraine should hold out for all the territory seized by Russia, saying on social media that he thinks Ukraine is in a position to win it all back.

Social media of course is the perfect place to air his uninformed musings.

It’s a reversal from his long-held position that Kyiv would need to give up some of its territory to Moscow to end the war – such as Crimea, which Russia annexed in 2014.

But now, “after getting to know and fully understand the Ukraine/Russia Military and Economic situation,” Trump said he believes Ukraine – backed by the European Union and NATO – can win back all its territory.

Ah. How fascinating. He admits he didn’t bother to get to know and fully understand the sitch before picking a side and sticking to it. We knew that, but it’s helpful of him to confess it in writing.

Well then let’s look at the Aims page; maybe they get more informative there.

The Space, Sexualities and Queer Research Group (SSQRG), was established in 2006 and aims to:

▼ Encourage geographic research and scholarship on topics related to sexualities and queer studies

▼ Promote educational ways for communicating geographic perspectives on sexualities and queer theories that will inform both curriculum and pedagogical needs

▼ Promote interest in geographies on issues related to sexualities and queer studies and promote the exchange of ideas and information about geographical intersections between sexualities and queer studies, where involvement of early-career researchers is maximised

Erm. No help. It’s just more repetition of labels without saying what’s behind them. What the flaming hell are “geographies on issues related to sexualities and queer studies”?

Last bullet point:

Offer a supportive environment for the exchange of ideas and the development of social and activist networks to fight forms of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and/or practices, sexual and gender identity and expression, and other forms of sexual and gender prejudice

You mean like the “gender prejudice” that knows men are not women?

Do you have a map handy?

So of course I had to find out more about the Space, Sexualities and Queer Research Group at the Royal Geographical Society, because the what what and what research group??? Why would the RGS have such a research group?

So here they are.

Welcome to the virtual site of the Space, Sexualities and Queer Research Group (SSQRG), a Research Group established in 2006 as part of the learned Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).

The SSQRG is a leading study group dedicated to the promotion and support of research, scholarship and scholar activism regarding sexualities and queer geographies. The Research Group works across interests and disciplines within the academe, and beyond. As such, it supports the production and application of knowledge to pursue a critical dialogue amongst academic and non-academic research-user parties, including policymakers, professionals, and members of the public.

Within the academe? It should be either “within academe” or “within the academy.”

But much more to the point – there is no information in that pompous paragraph. It’s just jargony handwaving. What scholarship “regarding sexualities”? And what does “scholarship regarding sexualities” have to do with geography? Why is this part of the RGS instead of sociology or the like? Outsiders would like to know. Cool about the “across interests and disciplines” and the “production and application of knowledge” and the “critical dialogue amongst academic and non-academic research-user parties” but if you look closely you will see that that doesn’t tell us anything. What exactly is geographic sexualities scholarship?

There’s one more paragraph; maybe they explain there.

This platform contains information about SSQRG’s remit, Committee, communications, and activities, including international conference forums, symposia, workshops, and other critical reading and knowledge exchange events, as well as ways for active involvement and collaboration.

Nope. We are none the wiser.

I recommend watching the video. It’s much worse than it sounds. Kadri lunges at Hamit Coskun while holding a very large knife in the stab position. Coskun tries to run away from him but falls down, and Kadri proceeds to kick him repeatedly. Kadri doesn’t actually stab Coskun, so props for that, but he’s extremely violent and threatening. Coskun was threatening a book, a book of which there are billions of copies in existence; Kadri was threatening a human being. The judge told Kadri what a great guy he is.