Tag: Trump

  • It’s pretty frustrating for most Republicans

    Oh really. Is that what happens.

    Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) on Thursday said he is fed up with the media’s portrayal of President Donald Trump. “What concerns me about the American press is this endless, endless attempt to label the guy as some kind of kook not fit to be president,” Graham told CNN. “It’s pretty frustrating for most Republicans, quite frankly, that it’s 24/7 attack on everything the president does or thinks. It gets a little old after a while.”

    Yeah, it does! Damn right it does. It gets old being shamed and degraded hour after hour by this appalling evil toxic malevolent zero of a man.

    It’s pretty frustrating for all decent people seeing a bad-in-every-way psychopath usurping the presidency and destroying everything he can reach.

    He’s not fit to be president. He could hardly be less fit unless he drive iron spikes straight into his brain.

    This is very different from the stance Graham took in early 2016, when Trump was running for president in the Republican primary. Back then, Graham, who supported Jeb Bush’s presidential campaign at the time and had previously run in the primary himself, called Trump a “kook” and “crazy” in an interview with Fox News. He said his party had gone “batshit crazy” because it was backing Trump. He also tweeted that Trump is “not fit to be President of the United States.”

    But now he’s fallen into line because TAX CUTS…and he has the gall to pretend to think the rest of us should too.

    He must be batshit crazy.

  • Numbered days

    Jennifer Rubin must have written this at top speed, because there are words missing. It’s about how dire this could be for Donnie from Queens.

    The Post reports, “Former national security adviser Michael Flynn pleaded guilty Friday to lying to the FBI. … Flynn’s admission … is an ominous sign for the White House, as court documents indicate Flynn is cooperating in the ongoing probe of possible coordination between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin to influence the 2016 election.” ABC News reports, “Michael Flynn promised ‘full cooperation to the Mueller team’ and is prepared to testify that as a candidate, Donald Trump ‘directed him to make contact with the Russians.’ ” That could be direct testimony implicating the president of campaign collusion.

    Flynn’s plea marks a dangerous turn. Flynn was a White House adviser, not a campaign aide. Moreover, there is no passing him off an errand boy or bit player. “Trump developed a close rapport with Flynn on the campaign trail, where the general delivered fiery denunciations of Hillary Clinton, including leading a ‘lock her up’ chant at the Republican National Convention, and he gave Trump much-needed national security credentials,” The Post reports. “Flynn, however, had a mixed reputation among other Trump aides, who thought he gave the president questionable information and questioned some of his business dealings.”

    Fiery denunciations, was it, when he himself is as crooked as ZZZZZZZ.

    And, of most concern to Trump, Flynn could provide evidence relating to interference with the Russia probe, including Trump’s efforts to get then-FBI Director James B. Comey to lay off Flynn. The ABC News report, if accurate, suggests it is the latter, with fatal consequences for the Trump presidency.

    Trump’s defenders will argue that this still does not touch on the underlying issue of collusion with Russia. That’s true but misses the point. If there was collusion, Flynn almost certainly would have known about it. He was both Trump’s closet foreign policy adviser and a pro-Russia operator who traveled to Russia to give a lavishly compensated speech and appeared on RT, Russia’s propaganda network, which he asserted was no different than any American news outlet. (RT has since be required to register as a foreign agent.) Trump can claim all he wants that the Russia investigation is a hoax, but if Flynn provides direct evidence implicating Trump, the president’s days in office are numbered.

    Fingers crossed.

  • It begins

    Here we go.

    President Trump’s former national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn, pleaded guilty on Friday to lying to the F.B.I. about conversations with the Russian ambassador last December during the presidential transition, bringing the special counsel’s investigation into the president’s inner circle.

    Mr. Flynn, who appeared in federal court in Washington, acknowledged that he was cooperating with the investigation by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, into Russian interference in the 2016 election. His plea agreement suggests that Mr. Flynn provided information to prosecutors, which may help advance the inquiry.

    Benjamin Wittes will need a whole set of baby cannons for this boom.

    Mr. Flynn pleaded guilty to making false statements to F.B.I. agents about two discussions with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey I. Kislyak. Lying to the F.B.I. carries a penalty of up to five years in prison.

    In one of the conversations described in court documents, the men discussed an upcoming United Nations Security Council vote on whether to condemn Israel’s building of settlements. At the time, the Obama administration was preparing to allow a Security Council vote on the matter.

    Jesus.

    One: you wouldn’t forget that. If you were Flynn it wouldn’t just slip your mind that you had chatted with the Russian ambassador about a UN vote on Israel’s activities.

    Two: the Trumpers weren’t in office yet. Obama was still president. Trumpists weren’t supposed to be meddling with policy in someone else’s administration.

    But after accepting Mr. Flynn’s resignation, the president repeatedly said he thought Mr. Flynn was “a very good person” who had been treated poorly. The day after Mr. Flynn resigned, Mr. Trump told the F.B.I. director at the time, James B. Comey, “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go,” according to a memo Mr. Comey wrote describing that meeting.

    In a news conference on Feb. 15, two days after Mr. Flynn’s resignation, the president blamed the media.

    “General Flynn is a wonderful man. I think he has been treated very, very unfairly by the media, as I call it, the fake media in many cases,” Mr. Trump said. “And I think it is really a sad thing that he was treated so badly.”

    This is the guy who is supposed to be so concerned about national security that he absolutely has to retweet Britain First videos that blame random Muslims for everything.

    Like Mr. Trump, Mr. Flynn was a brash, outspoken critic of former President Barack Obama, asserting that Shariah, or Islamic law, was spreading in the United States under his watch — a claim that was repeatedly debunked — and saying that the United States is in a “world war” with Islamist militants.

    Investigators working for the special counsel have questioned witnesses about Mr. Flynn’s dealings with the Turkish government and whether he was secretly paid by Turkish officials during the campaign. After he left the White House, Mr. Flynn disclosed that the Turkish government had paid him more than $500,000 to represent its interests in a dispute with the United States.

    Creeping Sharia! Turkey v the US!

    Confused, isn’t he.

  • The worldwide conspiracy

    The Times gives Trump credit for accomplishing something – uniting people in the UK in loathing of him.

    One member of Parliament called him a “fascist.” Another described him as “stupid.” A third wondered aloud whether President Trump was “racist, incompetent or unthinking — or all three.”

    The stream of criticism that began after Mr. Trump shared anti-Muslim videos from a far-right British group on Wednesday morning turned into a gusher on Thursday, after he rebuked Prime Minister Theresa May in a nighttime tweet, telling her: “Don’t focus on me, focus on the destructive Radical Islamic Terrorism that is taking place within the United Kingdom.”

    Mr. Trump’s one-two punch managed to generate rare unanimity in a Britain that is deeply divided over the contentious process of leaving the European Union.

    Ya gotta admire that. He does do a remarkably thorough job of being awful – he’s awful in every possible way. There’s nothing to like about him at all, no matter how trivial.

    Members of the opposition Labour Party had been among the first to pounce on Mr. Trump’s tweets, but they were joined on Thursday by several members of Mrs. May’s Conservative Party.

    One of them, Peter Bone, called on Mrs. May to persuade Mr. Trump to delete his Twitter account. Another, Tim Loughton, urged Twitter to take down Mr. Trump’s account “as it would that of any other citizen of the world who peddled such hate.”

    A third Conservative lawmaker, Paul Masterton, lamented: “Just because somebody stops using Twitter, it does not mean that they cease to be a twit.”

  • Many layers of humiliation

    Julian Borger wonders how that “special relationship” is going these days.

    It was some poor official’s job this morning to tell Theresa May that while she slept, the relationship with the US became special for all the wrong reasons.

    It is at least historic. No US president in modern times has addressed a UK prime minister with the open peevishness and contempt of Donald Trump’s tweet telling May to mind her own business.

    He’s draining the swamp.

    There are many layers of humiliation here for May to get her head around over breakfast. Not only is it personally demeaning, it is also politically toxic.

    The prospect of a successful or at least survivable Brexit is posited on a strong relationship with Washington. In that regard, May’s successful rush to Washington in January to become the first foreign leader received at the Trump White House was presented as a coup.

    Under EU rules, the two countries are not allowed even to start negotiating a trade deal until the UK is truly out of Europe, but the warm words and the pictures of the Trump and May holding hands at least struck an encouraging tone. The prime minister got to Washington in time to help the state department and Congress stop the president lifting sanctions on Russia, and squeezed out of him his first grudging words of support for Nato.

    But after that it was all ↓↓↓

    So what now? May and Europe want to salvage the nuclear deal with Iran that Trump wants to destroy, and they also agree on not getting into the jolly little nuclear war with North Korea which Trump is doing his best to set off.

    The irony is that it is just such European unity of purpose that May is committed to undermine. Having a US president who is so erratic and extreme that he makes disagreements with EU seem petty by comparison is a bad look for a prime minister championing Brexit.

    Tragic, isn’t it. The Brexit vote happened before Trump was nominated.

    Can we do 2016 over again?

  • Not welcome

    Trump’s contemptuous tweet at Theresa May yesterday didn’t go down very well in the UK.

    Trump’s message came in response to criticism from the British prime minister’s spokesman over the president’s retweeting of incendiary videos posted by the deputy leader of a British far-right group.

     

    Justine Greening, the education secretary, said never mind the tweet, look at the bigger picture: allies, important, mustn’t let a tweet distract, etc.

    Sajid Javid, the local government secretary, who is Muslim, took a much harder line. He posted on Twitter: “So POTUS has endorsed the views of a vile, hate-filled racist organisation that hates me and people like me. He is wrong and I refuse to let it go and say nothing.”

    The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, who has previously clashed with Trump, also issued a strongly-worded statement of condemnation, calling on the prime minister to demand an apology.

    Brendan Cox, widower of Jo Cox, an MP murdered last year by a man reportedly shouting “Britain first” as he shot and stabbed her, told CNN: “I think we probably got used to a degree of absurdity, of outrageous retweets and tweets from the president, but I think this felt like it was a different order.

    “Here he was retweeting a felon, somebody who was convicted of religiously aggravated harassment, of an organisation that is a hate-driven organisation on the extreme fringes of the far, far right of British politics. This is like the president retweeting the Ku Klux Klan.”

    US Democrats joined the condemnation. Keith Ellison, the deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee and a Muslim member of Congress, branded the president “a racist”.

    But the White House defended the retweets. The principal deputy press secretary, Raj Shah, told reporters on Air Force One: “We think that it’s never the wrong time to talk about security and public safety for the American people. Those are the issues he was raising with the tweets this morning.”

    No, they are not. The three tweets had nothing to do with security and public safety for the American people. Trump didn’t mention security and public safety for the American people in those tweets. It would be as if Trump retweeted three racist videos of immigrants from North Korea and then his press people talked about Kim’s nukes – or, for that matter, it would be as if May or Merkel or Macron retweeted three xenophobic videos of Americans behaving badly and their press people said “But Trump!”

    They should cancel the state visit.

  • Issue a a prohibition order

    Britain’s ambassador to the US made a formal protest yesterday.

    Theresa May condemned the president’s decision on Wednesday to share propaganda videos tweeted by the deputy leader of Britain First and is expected to address the issue again in a speech in the Middle East on Thursday.

    But government sources revealed that Sir Kim Darroch, the ambassador to Washington, had already raised the issue formally.

    In Westminster, MPs lined up to condemn the president’s behaviour, and urge the government to formally cancel the state visit invitation made by May when she became the first world leader to visit the Trump White House last year.

    But the home secretary said nope we’re not going to cancel…but she also said that no date had been sent. Could be one of those jam tomorrow things.

    Privately, government ministers do not expect such a visit to take place in the foreseeable future, amid concerns about the possibility of widespread protests.

    And there’s zero reason to think Trump will become less awful (and plenty of reason to think he will only become worse), so “foreseeable future” probably means ever.

    Chris Bryant, a senior Labour backbencher, has written to May urging her to go further, and officially ban Trump from entering the UK on the grounds he is condoning fascism and his presence is “not conducive to the public good”.

    Bryant, a former Foreign Office minister, said the prime minister should issue a prohibition order against the president like those that apply to other far-right figures from the US.

    Wouldn’t that be great? It won’t happen, but it’s a lovely fantasy.

    He cited the cases of two US far-right bloggers, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller, who were banned by May in 2013 from entering the UK to take part in English Defence League rallies, as precedents for taking action against Trump.

    In his letter to May, he said: “I am writing to you to ask you and the home secretary to take immediate action to ban the president of the United States, Donald Trump, from entering the United Kingdom, due to his apparent support for far-right groups in this country.

    “In retweeting Jayda Fransen’s posts, it is absolutely clear to me that President Trump is supporting and condoning fascism and far-right activity. This activity has frequently taken the form of violence on our streets. Ms Fransen herself has a long history of racism and Islamophobia, some of it criminal. Many of the people you have rightly banned from entering the UK were guilty of less than this.”

    In parliament, Doughty said the president’s decision to share Britain First material showed he was “racist, unthinking or incompetent – or all three”.

    Oh yes, he’s all three, and more.

  • Trumpy’s ready to make a change

    Well Trump has his faults but at least he’s good at managing his own people.

    Oh wait, no he’s not.

    The White House has developed a plan to force out Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson, whose relationship with President Trump has been strained, and replace him with Mike Pompeo, the C.I.A. director, perhaps within the next several weeks, senior administration officials said on Thursday.

    People keep quitting or being fired or being told to leave. It’s almost as if he’s not a pleasant guy to work for, or be within a mile of.

    It was not immediately clear whether Mr. Trump has given final approval to the plan, but he has been said to have soured on Mr. Tillerson and in general is ready to make a change at the State Department.

    Well sure, why wouldn’t he be? Tillerson has been there ten whole months – that’s like forever. Presidents normally get a new Secretary of State every three weeks or so. It’s self-evident that foreign policy goes best when there’s constant turnover in the State Department and nobody knows which end is up.

    At the same time, there was some concern in the White House about the appearance of a rush to the exits given that other senior officials may also leave in the early part of the new year. White House officials were debating whether it would be better to spread out any departures or just get them over with all at once.

    Appearance? That’s not appearance, that’s reality. Nobody wants to work for this fuck, because he’s crazed and stupid and out of control.

    The ouster of Mr. Tillerson would end a turbulent reign at the State Department for the former Exxon Mobil chief executive, who has been largely marginalized over the last year.

    Over the last year? He hasn’t even been there for a year. Trump hasn’t been there for a year; none of them have. So what they’re saying is that he’s been marginalized since day one, which is just awesome for our standing as an adult country that can button its pants by itself.

    Mr. Tillerson’s departure has been widely anticipated for months, but associates have said he was intent on finishing out the year to retain whatever dignity he could. Even so, an end-of-year exit would make his time in office the shortest of any secretary of state whose tenure was not ended by a change in presidents in nearly 120 years.

    Oh, really? I guess I was wrong about the every three weeks thing then.

    Also, Tillerson’s concern with his own “dignity” is ridiculous. If you want “dignity” then don’t go to work for Donald Trump. If you go to work for Donald Trump you deserve your fate.

    Mr. Pompeo, a former three-term member of Congress, has impressed Mr. Trump during daily intelligence briefings and become a trusted policy adviser even on issues far beyond the C.I.A.’s normal mandate, like health care. But he has been criticized by intelligence officers for being too political in his job.

    If Trump trusts him, he must be bad.

    Mr. Tillerson’s appointment was something of an experiment from the start. Never before had a president named a secretary of state with no prior experience in government, politics or the military. Mr. Trump, who himself had no government or military experience before this year, bet that Mr. Tillerson would be able to translate his formidable skills in the corporate world to international diplomacy after 41 years at Exxon Mobil.

    Blah blah blah – in other words these reckless bozos thought it would be fun to let totally unqualified people destroy the US government and much about the US along with it.

    Whatever; Tillerson was there long enough to trash the State Department. Score, huh?

  • “We don’t think that was my voice”

    He’ll say anything.

    Shortly after his victory last year, Donald J. Trump began revisiting one of his deepest public humiliations: the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape of him making vulgar comments about women.

    Despite his public acknowledgment of the recording’s authenticity in the final days of the presidential campaign — and his hasty videotaped apology under pressure from his advisers — Mr. Trump as president-elect began raising the prospect with allies that it may not have been him on the tape after all.

    Most of Mr. Trump’s aides ignored his changing story. But in January, shortly before his inauguration, Mr. Trump told a Republican senator that he wanted to investigate the recording that had him boasting about grabbing women’s genitals.

    “We don’t think that was my voice,” Mr. Trump told the senator, according to a person familiar with the conversation. Since then, Mr. Trump has continued to suggest that the tape that nearly upended his campaign was not actually him, according to three people close to the president.

    Liar liar.

    Mr. Trump’s falsehoods about the “Access Hollywood” tape are part of his lifelong habit of attempting to create and sell his own version of reality. Advisers say he continues to privately harbor a handful of conspiracy theories that have no grounding in fact.

    In recent months, they say, Mr. Trump has used closed-door conversations to question the authenticity of President Barack Obama’s birth certificate. He has also repeatedly claimed that he lost the popular vote last year because of widespread voter fraud, according to advisers and lawmakers.

    In other words he’s a liar and a fraud, not just in his money-making habits but in everything. He’s rotten all the way down.

    One senator who listened as the president revived his doubts about Mr. Obama’s birth certificate chuckled on Tuesday as he recalled the conversation. The president, he said, has had a hard time letting go of his claim that Mr. Obama was not born in the United States. The senator asked not to be named to discuss private conversations.

    Heh heh heh. So funny. Heh heh. That nigger who got to be president was born in NiggerLand, not here. Heh heh heh.

    To the president’s critics, his conspiracy-mongering goes to the heart of why he poses a threat to the country.

    “It’s dangerous to democracy; you’ve got to have shared facts,” Senator Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona, said in an interview on Tuesday. “And on so many of these, there’s empirical evidence that says no: You didn’t win the popular vote, there weren’t more people at your inauguration than ever, that was your voice on that tape, you admitted it before.”

    Mr. Flake, who is not running for re-election, said in the interview that he was about to begin a series of speeches on the Senate floor outlining his concerns about Mr. Trump. The first, he said, will be dedicated to what Mr. Flake called the president’s disregard for the truth.

    But the ones who are running for re-election or will be in the next one or the one after that – they’re just watching while the country slides into the sewer.

  • New questions about his temperament

    CNN points out that it’s a little unfortunate that Trump appears to be getting crazier every day right now when North Korea is getting Better and Better and BETTER at lobbing nukes in our direction. Yeah, it is.

    [T]he President of the United States is raising new questions about his temperament, his judgment and his understanding of the resonance of his global voice and the gravity of his role with a wild sequence of insults, inflammatory tweets and bizarre comments.

    On Wednesday Trump caused outrage and sparked fears of violent reprisals against Americans and US interests overseas by retweeting graphic anti-Muslim videos by an extreme far right British hate group. Earlier this week he used a racial slur in front of Native American war heroes. He’s attacked global press freedom, after cozying up to autocrats on his recent Asia tour.

    And now there are reports that the President has revived conspiracy theories about former President Barack Obama’s birthplace and is suggesting an “Access Hollywood” video on which he was heard boasting sexually assaulting women, and for which he apologized last year, had been doctored.

    In normal times, it would be a concern that the President is conducting himself in a manner so at odds with the decorum and propriety associated for over two centuries with the office he holds.

    And in these times it’s fucking terrifying!

    Yeah, we know.

    Trump has always crushed convention and been ready to step on racial, cultural and behavioral taboos, evidenced in his response for instance to Charlottesville riots and willingness to exploit foreign terror attacks to push his immigration policies. In many ways his spurning of political correctness has been key to his appeal. But some close observers of the President say they believe he has become even more unmoored in recent weeks.

    “Something is unleashed with him lately,” said New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman, who wrote about Trump’s return to Birther conspiracy theories in on Wednesday morning.

    “I don’t know what is causing it, I don’t know how to describe it,” said Haberman, who is also a CNN contributor.

    I’ll give it a shot. He’s a poisonous, terrible, malevolent human being, and he’s getting much worse.

  • The president was talking about the need for military spending

    Today’s episode of Downward With Trump:

    President Trump shared videos on Twitter early Wednesday morning that supposedly portray Muslims committing acts of violence, images that are likely to fuel anti-Islam sentiments popular among the president’s political base in the United States and that prompted the office of Britain’s prime minister to issue a statement condemning the tweets.

    Mr. Trump retweeted the video posts from an ultranationalist British party leader, Jayda Fransen, who has previously been charged in the United Kingdom with “religious aggravated harassment,” according to news reports. The videos were titled: “Muslim migrant beats up Dutch boy on crutches!”“Muslim Destroys a Statue of Virgin Mary!” and “Islamist mob pushes teenage boy off roof and beats him to death!”

    It is unusual to see an American president promote this type of content.

    To put it mildly…in fact to put it inaccurately: I don’t think we’ve ever seen a US president do that. Subtler versions, yes, like Reagan launching his campaign in Philadelphia, Mississippi, of all places, but crude exclamatory!!! shit like this? I don’t think so.

    The White House spokeswoman, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, defended the president’s tweets to reporters and said the president was talking about the need for national security and military spending.

    Oh please. What’s a purported Muslim purportedly destroying a statue of the purported “Virgin Mary” got to do with military spending or national security?

    “The threat is real,” Ms. Sanders said. “The threat needs to be addressed. The threat has to be talked about, and that’s what the president is doing in bringing that up.”

    By Twitter-ranting about Catholic religious icons. I don’t think so.

    British politicians were quick to condemn Mr. Trump’s tacit endorsement of the videos.

    The office of Theresa May, the British prime minister, said, “It is wrong for the president to have done this.”

    In a statement, the office also said of the far-right party Britain First, for which Ms. Fransen is the deputy: “Britain First seeks to divide communities by their use of hateful narratives that peddle lies and stoke tensions. They cause anxiety to law-abiding people.”

    David Lammy, a member of Parliament for the Labour Party, echoed that statement on Twitter. “Trump sharing Britain First. Let that sink in. The President of the United States is promoting a fascist, racist, extremist hate group whose leaders have been arrested and convicted. He is no ally or friend of ours.”

    Or of ours.

    This reaction is exactly what James R. Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, said he feared when he saw the president’s Twitter posts.

    “It has all kinds of ripple effects, both in terms of perhaps inciting or encouraging anti-Muslim violence, and as well causes, I think, our friends and allies around the world to wonder about the judgment of the president of the United States,” Mr. Clapper told CNN on Wednesday.

    Britain First was co-founded by a man who later supported Mr. Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign and was part of the efforts to spread anti-Clinton news on social media.

    Name of James Dowson.

    The official Twitter account of Britain First also wrote to its more than 24,000 followers on Wednesday morning about Mr. Trump’s posts.

    “Donald Trump has just retweeted Britain First’s deputy leader Jayda Fransen THREE times,” the group wrote.

    The hateful hate-mongering dogwhistling racist Trump retweeted a far-right racist party’s hate-mongering videos THREE TIMES.

    Britain First calls itself a “patriotic” political party but has been criticized by human rights groups as being a far-right extremist group that engages in activities calculated to bait Muslims.

    Formed in 2011 by former members of the far-right British National Party, the group states on its Facebook page that its mission is to fight “the many injustices that are routinely inflicted on the British people” and to defend British culture against the excesses of left-wing liberalism and political correctness.

    Chuka Umunna, a Labour Party member of Parliament, wrote on Twitter that an invitation for Mr. Trump to come to Britain for a state visit should be immediately withdrawn. “The US President is normalising hatred. If we don’t call this out, we are going down a very dangerous road. His invite should be withdrawn,” he wrote.

    Can we also withdraw the invitation for him to be the US head of state? Because that would be awesome.

    Mr. Trump’s tweets were welcomed by a former Ku Klux Klan leader, David Duke, who wrote on Twitter, “Thank God for Trump! That’s why we love him!”

    https://twitter.com/DrDavidDuke/status/935879285562335232

    New depths.

  • Spurned

    It’s taken some effort to ignore the wall-to-wall freakout about the Windsor wedding, but Newsweek has a kernel of pleasing information.

    When the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were married, in 2011, the Obamas were left off the guest list because of the added security costs of protecting the president. The day of the wedding, thousands of Britons took the day off, and about 1,900 guests attended the ceremony in Westminster Abbey in central London. The Obamas traveled to the U.K. less than a month later for an official state visit. Since Obama is no longer president, he doesn’t require as extensive a security detail as he once did.

    A reason not to invite Trump, along with a reason Obama might be welcome.

    That wouldn’t be of interest were it not for the fact that it will infuriate Trump if it happens.

    If Trump were to appear at Prince Harry’s wedding in spring 2018, it would likely spark protests. When Prime Minister Theresa May offered Trump a state visit early this year, polls showed that 2 million people intended to take part in a protest against him. The risk of embarrassment, were such a protest to occur at a royal wedding, might put the couple off inviting such a controversial figure.

    Instead of a state visit, Trump’s trip to the U.K., scheduled for early 2018, has been cast as a “working trip” where he will not meet the queen. In January, sources said Trump wanted to go “one better” than Obama’s state visit and play golf with Queen Elizabeth II at Balmoral Castle.

    Now he doesn’t even get to say “how do” from a distance at Buck House. Soz, Don, you’re just too awful.

    The Obamas, on the other hand, have become buddies with Harry. U jellus Don?

    As for President Trump, Harry’s wife-to-be revealed that she was not a fan. In an interview on The Nightly Show With Larry Wilmore during the 2016 election, Markle said she might decide to stay in Toronto—where her show, Suits, is filmed—if Trump were to win.

    “We film Suits in Toronto, and I might just stay in Canada. I mean, come on, if that’s reality we are talking about, come on, that is a game changer in terms of how we move in the world here,” she said.

    Markle supported Democrat Hillary Clinton during the election, calling Trump “misogynistic.”

    Well, Donnie can always watch re-runs of The Apprentice.

  • Welcome to the Oval Office Comedy Hour

    A few more details on Trump’s disgusting derailment yesterday.

    Native American groups have long objected to President Trump’s use of the nickname “Pocahontas” to deride one of his political foes, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).

    Well of course they have. A lot of goons are pretending to be unable to see anything racist about it, but that’s just the usual fraud. It’s racist first of all to use any name like that as a generic for All People In This Group I’m Insulting. People used to do that casually without giving it any thought, but those days are over.

    It’s racist in that it reveals that Trump thinks one Native American can stand for all of them.

    It’s racist in that it reveals that Trump doesn’t know of any other Native Americans.

    It’s exponentially more racist now because Trump has been using it as a calculated racist insult for two years.

    It’s racist the same way it’s racist to call Native American women “squaws” – which is another thing non-Native people used to do casually without thinking.

    It’s racist in that Trump would never think a single name could stand for all Americans or all white Americans.

    “I just want to thank you because you’re very, very special people,” Trump said Monday afternoon, speaking to a small group of code talkers. “You were here long before any of us were here. Although we have a representative in Congress who, they say, was here a long time ago. They call her ‘Pocahontas.’ ”

    Another thing about that – notice the opposition of “you” and “any of us.” He framed the Navajo vets as the others and “us” as “us” – not you, not the others, not the weird little minority we can’t even be polite to for ten seconds.

    Trump’s reference — unrelated to the ceremony and widely considered an offensive racial slur — seemed to catch the code talkers off-guard, prompting polite smiles and silence. The scene played out in front of a portrait of President Andrew Jackson, who signed into law the Indian Removal Act.

    In front of it and very close to it. Do Oval Office ceremonies normally play out there? Are they normally shoved up against a bit of wall rather than in front of the desk? I don’t think so. I’m not certain, but I don’t think so. If that’s not normal…did they really do that on purpose? If they did…that’s not just Trump and his out of control monsterness, it’s calculated sadism.

    Mihio Manus, a spokesman for the president and vice president of the Navajo Nation, said that while “we’re very appreciative of President Trump honoring the code talkers first and foremost,” he thought Trump’s comments about Warren were inappropriate.

    “It’s unfortunate that President Trump would refer to Sen. Elizabeth Warren as Pocahontas in a joking way,” Manus said. “Pocahontas, although she wasn’t Navajo, definitely was a historical figure in the foundation of this nation who is misrepresented in history. And so we as the Navajo Nation don’t feel any member of any tribal nation should be used as the punchline of a joke.”

    And all the less so when the ceremony taking place is nothing to do with Pocahontas or Elizabeth Warren, and Trump brought them up only because he can’t see a Native American now without instantly being reminded of his long-running racist campaign. “Oh, look, Injuns, here to pick up a medal…I get to give it to them…nice Injuns…POCAHONTAS.”

    And at the end of his eruption, after “They call her ‘Pocahontas,’ ” he dropped his paw heavily on the shoulder of the guy nearest him and said, “But I like you.”

    When asked about the Jackson portrait, Manus said, “It’s unfortunate.”

    On Tuesday, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a Vietnam War veteran and frequent critic of the president, similarly expressed dismay at Trump’s comments.

    “Our nation owes a debt of gratitude to the Navajo Code Talkers, whose bravery, skill & tenacity helped secure our decisive victory over tyranny & oppression during WWII,” he wrote on Twitter. “Politicizing these genuine American heroes is an insult to their sacrifice.”

    Especially coming from lazy greedy selfish President Bone Spurs.

    Laura Tohe, the daughter of a Navajo code talker and a professor at Arizona State University who has written a book about the heroes, said it is “huge” that the code talkers were honored at the White House. But, she said she was dismayed by Trump’s remarks during the ceremony.

    “The whole idea of using this platform to make a disparaging remark about Senator Warren was inappropriate and disrespectful,” Tohe said.

    It’s that one job thing. He had one job to do, and he refused to do it. His job was to make those three men feel respected, and he totally blew that one simple job.

    Tohe’s father, who died in 1985, and other young Navajo men were recruited by the Marine Corps to send messages in the Pacific. Japanese cryptographers were unable to decipher the code, which helped the United States.

    Stephanie Fryberg, a professor of psychology and American Indian studies at the University of Washington, said she was aghast to see the ceremony in front of a portrait of Jackson and to hear Trump say “Pocahontas” again.

    “Rather than really honoring those veterans he took advantage of their presence to make yet another demeaning remark about Senator Warren,” she said. “Why invite those honorable men to the White House if you can’t treat them with respect?”

    Jacqueline Pata, executive director of the National Congress of American Indians, said only three of the 13 surviving code talkers could make it to the White House. They are in their 90s and “were so excited about being able to participate in this event and to be there,” she said.

    And that hateful bone spur of a man ruined it for them.

    Pata said her organization has “tried to educate those within the White House” about using the name “Pocahontas” in a derogatory way. The event, she said, was held to honor both Native American History Month and Veterans Day.

    Pata said she is concerned that the president’s remarks will overshadow the enormous contribution the code talkers made to American history.

    “They turned the tide in the war,” she said. “It’s well-documented that they made the difference, and I don’t want us to forget that.”

    Yes yes yes but POCAHONTAS

  • Not amused

    Fire him. Fire him. Fire him.

    FIRE HIM

  • President Racist

    Oh GOD.

    President Trump used a White House event honoring Navajo veterans of World War II on Monday to utter a favorite Native American-related insult of a political opponent, deriding Senator Elizabeth Warren as “Pocahontas.”

    Standing in the Oval Office alongside three World War II Navajo code talkers, Mr. Trump made the unscripted comment after other officials praised the veterans’ history and contributions.

    “You were here long before any of us were here,” Mr. Trump said as he turned to look at the code talkers. “Although we have a representative in Congress who they say was here a long time ago. They call her Pocahontas.”

    I wish someone would throw him, fully clothed, into a sewage tank.

    Mr. Trump’s use of “Pocahontas” has drawn objections in the past from a number of Native Americans, many of whom regard his mention of the historical figure as offensive and divisive.

    But on Monday, the White House defended the remark. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, said the name was not a racial slur.

    “What most people find offensive is Senator Warren lying about her heritage to advance her career,” Ms. Sanders said.

    I wish someone would throw her into that tank right beside Trump, and then throw rotting cabbages at their heads.

    Editing to add:

  • Past present and future

    The New York Review of Books is running a series on living in Trumpworld. Katha Pollitt wrote a blisterer.

    I sometimes feel like I’m a different person now. I’m fidgety and irritable and have trouble concentrating. For months after the election, I could hardly read, except for books about Roman history, which turns out to be full of Trumps: fantastically rich sociopaths obsessed with crushing their enemies.

    Snap. I was thinking Nero-Caligula all day after the Man of the Year tweet.

    My work seems trivial: Given what we are facing, what difference does one more Nation column make? I might as well be an ancient Egyptian scribe logging production figures for cat mummies. In the old days, the days before Trump, it bothered me that so many people loved things I thought were stupid. Now I just think, Go ahead, enjoy yourself. Maybe your Batman DVDs will comfort you when we’re wandering around in the ashen hellscape of whatever apocalypse Trump will bring down upon us.

    Just about everything seems trivial, or futile and hopeless. Trump is laying waste to everything so what’s the use? What can we even?

    It works retroactively, too, because Trump is undoing every single thing Obama did.

    It also projects into the future, because we have a pattern here: the Republicans keep putting worse and worse malevolent idiots into the White House. Reagan, Bush Junior, Trump – what future can there even be?

  • Beware the certain bloodlines

    Trump yesterday:

    Oh dear. It turns out that link was

    1. broken
    2. wack

    Newsweek has the details.

    President Donald Trump Saturday re-tweeted and thanked a website showcasing his achievements —that has also promoted conspiracy theories and anti-Semitism.

    The website has in the past published articles promoting the conspiracy theory that DNC staffer Seth Rich was murdered on the orders of Hillary Clinton, and that banking is corrupted by “certain bloodlines.”

    Subtle.

    The site has tweeted claims that Luciferians, financier George Soros, and the Vatican control the world.

    The same bizarre “flow chart” claims Jews secretly control finance.

    “Banking families, Certain bloodline families have dominated global financial institutions, including: BIS, FED, IMF, World Bank, Wall Street,” according to the site.

    But now, miraculously, we have Trump to put a stop to all that! Praise Jesus!

    It is not the first time Trump has touted information from sites trafficking in right-wing conspiracies.

    In July, 2016, Trump re-tweeted a graphic showing a picture of his presidential rival, Hillary Clinton, superimposed over a star reminiscent of the Star of David, with a pile of cash and the words “most corrupt candidate ever.”

    The Anti-Defamation League accused the Trump campaign of using an image with “obvious anti-Semitic overtones” which had been lifted from a white supremacist website.

    Months earlier he re-tweeted a comment form the Twitter account @WhiteGenocideTM, which had promoted neo-Nazi content.

    Well we already know he has a soft spot for neo-Nazis.

  • Represent

  • The guy with his face pressed against the glass

    Chris Cillizza asks and answers why Trump is so obsessed with being on the cover of TIME.

    Why does Trump care so much about Time — a magazine that, like all national magazines, has been hit hard by the fracturing of the media and the changing advertising landscape?

    Because all of Trump’s ideas about the media were formed in the 1980s. And at that time, Time was a massively important part of the culture. It was a tastemaker — and breaker. And, most importantly for Trump, it had a cover. A cover that, if you were on it, signified success in the broader culture.

    Except not really. Time then (and still, as far as I know) was seen as deeply middlebrow, conservative, cautious…uninteresting. It was about like being covered by TV Guide or Readers Digest. It was like eating at McDonalds.

    That sort of recognized success is what Trump has spent his whole life craving — and disdaining when he doesn’t receive it. He views himself as someone who, despite his successes and wealth, has never been accepted into the clubs and communities that he covets. He is forever the guy with his face pressed against the glass, watching the people he wants to be friends with eat, drink and be merry in clubs they won’t let him into.

    Yes but Time makes no difference to all that. Snobs aren’t impressed by people on the cover of Time.

    Making the cover of Time was — and is — to Trump a recognition by those very elites that he is one of them.

    So wrong. I don’t know if it’s Trump who’s wrong here or Cillizza, but I promise you being on the cover of Time is not a fast track to being embraced by the elites.

    Neither, for that matter, is being a noisy regular on Fox News; neither is being president of the US. Don is never going to break that barrier, because he is what he is and not something else. He’s deeply vulgar; he radiates vulgarity from every pore; that’s never going to change.

    Fun fact: my uncle was on the cover of Time once. Not blood-uncle: my mother’s sister’s husband.

    Image result for george gallup cover time

  • TIME to world: Trump lied

    Trump of the year.

    https://twitter.com/politvidchannel/status/934199988543832064

    Why doesn’t THE WHOLE WORLD name him GLORIOUS ASCENDED MASTER HUMAN OF THE YEAR every single year? Why, why, WHY??

    Meanwhile, TIME itself says excuse us no we didn’t.

    So…why on earth did he tweet that silly lie? Did he simply forget that TIME would see it and point out that he lied? If so, what else is he forgetting? That China too has nukes? That Putin once ran the KGB? That he has grandchildren?