Apparently the NY Times doesn’t pay much attention to the California fires.
This “historic” spate of California wildfires have so far displaced hundreds of thousands during a pandemic, killed seven, destroyed at least tens of thousands of structures, burned through the equivalent acreage of a small state and sent plumes of smoke over several regions, forcing millions indoors during a heat wave.
Yet the country’s paper of record – the New York Times – seems unwilling to feature this incredibly newsworthy disaster that has affected millions of Americans prominently on its pages.
It is a big country, a big unwieldy country, but all the same.
… when the Washington Post dedicates its lead, above-the-fold front page image to the wildfires and the New York Times chooses to run an image of a water park party in Wuhan, China? Well, that’s a choice, to say the least.
I guess the Times is a little Caliphobic.

Comments
2 responses to “Off the front page entirely”
Is the owner of the NYT a chum of the chump?
No, but the people at the Times are hell-bent on being seen as impartial…and some people argue that Maggie Haberman is a chum of the chump.