It’s really extraordinary. That tweet has been sitting there since January 4 (with replies turned off, gee I wonder why). Why does Twitter permanently ban women who reject trans dogma while leaving a machete threat alone?
It’s really extraordinary. That tweet has been sitting there since January 4 (with replies turned off, gee I wonder why). Why does Twitter permanently ban women who reject trans dogma while leaving a machete threat alone?
Comments
3 responses to “A prominent cishet figure like her”
I’m guessing their thinking goes something like this: “Your words are threats. My threats are words.”
It goes along with “Not believing what I say means you don’t think I have a right to exist.”
What “bigoted violence”?
When have gender critical feminists ever posed with machetes, or barbed-wire-wrapped baseball bats, or AR-15’s, or guillotines, or nooses (the genuine kind, not ribbons on a fence)? Or punch-a-train t-shirts with red “blood” stains?
Answer: Never.
Biology is real.
Leave women alone.
That’s it. That’s the “bigoted violence.”
And it’s usually coupled with, “Live how you like, dress how you like, have whatever relationship you like with anyone who will have you, live your best life, be fulfilled and happy in yourselves.”
Bigoted violence.
Leave the children alone.
That one is the closest to violence, because it’s pretty f*ing vehement. But vehemence and unwillingness to compromise on abuse are not the same thing as “violence.”
Train words never mean anything close to reality.
Women saying “no” to men. Women having boundaries. That’s the core.