It didn’t have to, it chose to
Disgusting narcissistic pig.
No we fucking don’t. We have to keep working for women to be able to talk about violence against us, not violence against men in lipstick.
And it’s violence against women – it’s not “GBV.” Men in red dresses don’t get to rename it GBV so that they can pretend it happens to them too. Get your self-obsessed kicks somewhere else you creep.
By appearing, he is perpetuating violence against women, and he can’t see it through his narcissism.
Words fail me.
https://twitter.com/genderisharmful/status/1467944372989796364
Seriously, fetishizing guns as part of making a lame pun is a RED FLAG WARNING as far as I’m concerned.
Oh, but you see it’s a NERF gun, and it’s all cuts and coloured, so it’s totally funny and nearly as feminine as that head tilt thing and the combo of that and the tilt and the dress and lipstick makes them totally hot and cute and empowered female, here them meow.
It’s a fucking insult.
Poor NERF has had to close off his own comments.
His 68 followers are so disappointed. :P
Gotta love the careful hiding of the Adam’s apple on that twitter photo.
On the lighter side now, consider the following knitting question I just spotted on the twitters:
“Asking ‘is the pattern suitable for a man’ is a meaningless question. If you mean ‘would a conservative, traditionally masculine cis man wear this’, then that’s what you should say”.
No wonder they have such a hard time defining what a woman is. All the qualifiers yet still the “man” remains at the root of the definition. How do they know it isn’t a ‘conservative, traditionally masculine cis WOman’? It’s gendered nonsense all the way down, really.