What’s relevant to being a woman

The ego-dogmatism soup here is something to behold.

Loud domineering guy tells the world that being biologically female isn’t relevant to being a woman. Not his to give away, yet again.

And, those people who have wombs, those people without whom none of us would exist, are women. That’s the word for them. If the Matt Dillahuntys and Adrian Harrops succeed in their efforts to make that word not mean “the ones with wombs” then we’ll just have to get a new word which will mean the same thing. What’s the point of that? We already have the word. If the Harrahuntys want a word that means “men who playact being women” they should get a new one instead of stealing ours.

There are a lot of scornful quote tweets.

2 Responses to “What’s relevant to being a woman”

Leave a Comment

Subscribe without commenting