Dundee man to lead people who menstruate
Honestly. They can’t even be consistent.
On the one hand Dundee man, on the other hand people who menstruate. It’s only the word “women” that is unsayable. Why is that? Is it because women are such unspeakable garbage that our rights and dignity and worth are all blotted out by the horror of us?
“Dundee person who is incapable of menstruating … ensure that people who actually do menstruate have dignity while menstruating”. Maybe that contrast would clarify the issue a little?
Referring to “people who menstruate” strips women of their dignity. He’ll have a big job to get it back.
This one is actually explicable. They’re perfectly happy to say “man” or “woman” for a specific individual, otherwise misgendering would make even less sense. It’s when they speak of groups or unspecified people that they pretend not to know what a woman is. Note, though, I said women. They still somehow remember when speaking about men, so while this one isn’t utterly inconsistent, they still are in general.
Mumsnet has uncovered that in his last 3 jobs the same woman has made the employment decision. Now, this could all be perfectly normal …
https://twitter.com/ForWomenScot/status/1559820364632543234?s=20&t=erlsIkpPjWtBZIlQa0tmYg
Civilization, over the clif…
Nullius: exactly. The period guru apparently thinks of himself individually as a man, but the women group includes an unspecified number of Very Special Pronoun Women so the unspeakable word must be avoided.