Still outrageous

Some thoughts.

Comments

4 responses to “Still outrageous”

  1. Mike Haubrich Avatar
    Mike Haubrich

    It’s a direct result of the 2016 election, and Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett being named instead of whoever Clinton would have named. I agree with Davidson, though. It’s very hard to overcome a woman’s movement split when many women won’t demand that the word “women” be used and men.get away with the dehumanizing ideas of gender ideology.

  2. iknklast Avatar

    Mike, from my reading on the subject, it appears the women’s movement has always been split and has had a tendency to purge hard working women from the movement for “wrong think” on some issue or another. This is probably the worst split we’ve had, and I do think it will be the hardest to overcome. Trans has entrenched in the LGB movement, it is trying to get entrenched in the anti-racism movement, and it has gotten itself entrenched in half of the women’s movement.

    The vitriol leveled at GC feminists is at least as bad as the vitriol leveled at Suffragists and Suffragettes. I hope these TAs don’t read the books and papers that detail the abuse women went through in jail during the Suffrage movement; they’ll get too many ideas. The women were treated worse than rapists, murderers, thieves, or any other crime. Why? Because men didn’t want to share power. Because men didn’t want to be asked to wash their own socks. Because men wanted to control women, and especially their reproduction. Well, it looks like we might be there on that last one, for sure.

  3. twiliter Avatar

    Hillary should have been president these past years. I can’t have nice things. :(

  4. Nullius in Verba Avatar
    Nullius in Verba

    One would hope that women would make women’s issues women’s political priority. Unfortunately, as partisan animus and the salience of non-gendered issues grow, so too does the difficulty of looking at another woman and seeing woman before and above party affiliation. That this phenomenon is exploited by those who oppose women’s interests really shouldn’t be surprising. Nonetheless, it is often tragic.