Stoked
But…
Why, yes…every teenager deserves the same development opportunity as every other teenager. So why is Dr Helen Webberley so hell-bent on destroying such development opportunities? Why does she promote the fad for terminating such opportunities and replacing them with gender parodies?
What s/he said doesn’t make any sense. There is only one”development opportunity” on offer for any child. The T industry is in the business of destroying any such opportunity for youngsters who fall into their clutches.
Infuriating as always.
This is all about the – very, very obvious – lie that children can go through the puberty of the opposite sex. It’s yet another of those slippery areas of gender identity bullshit. It will take you less than five minutes to find someone who swears on their unbinary re-un-birthing co-parent one moment that of course nobody says that a child can have the puberty of the opposite sex, who the next moment says they absolutely can as a justification for puberty blockers.
The ‘explanation’ is always to pretend that puberty means different things in different contexts. The thing is, of course, that that’s true. There are scientific, medical, social, sociological, etc etc connotations of what happens during puberty, but the lie here is to switch between them without warning, depending on the argument being made.
This is such an breathtakingly dangerous, horrible lie, though. It’s even worse than the lie that adults can change sex, which has the very same sort of slippery explanation/justification.