The CBC is being a little bit bashful in its wording here…
Dead “as a result of the conflict”? Meaning what, dead of a broken heart?
But, I’m grateful to them in a way, because that silly periphrasis introduced me to this guy:
The CBC is being a little bit bashful in its wording here…
Dead “as a result of the conflict”? Meaning what, dead of a broken heart?
But, I’m grateful to them in a way, because that silly periphrasis introduced me to this guy:
Comments
3 responses to “As a result”
There’s this too:
https://nationalpost.com/news/cbc-tells-journalists-to-not-call-hamas-terrorists-in-leaked-memo
@1 Just as we don’t hear it called a holy war anymore, but rather a conflict. It changes perception by subtly changing semantics. All wars are conflicts, but not all conflicts are wars. The word terrorist depends on context, sure, but I wouldn’t go as far as to call it opinion, it describes something.
The point could be illustrated by substituting crossdresser in instances transwoman is used. There may be some small definitional differences, but we are told the words mean very different things. Transwoman contains the word woman thereby adding connotation to manipulate perception, and then opinion is affected. This is not an accident.
Using the word terrorist is every bit as opinionated as avoiding using it.
This reminded me of the headlines that “Netanyahu Declares War” as if this is somehow momentous, and the subsequent comparisons of the latest attacks (of many over the years) in Israel to the 9/11 attack. This war has been going on in varying intensity for as long as anyone can remember. Sensationalize on the one hand, and downplay with soft language on the other.
Deciphering all the spin is tedious.