The great and powerful Oz has spoken
What naïve credulous babble.
Oh it’s real is it? How do you know? Why am I not aware of having one? How do you know you have one?
Also what is it? What does that mean? Please explain without tautology – without using the word or its cognates.
And what is a “valid” identity? How do you know trans ones are “equally as valid”? Please explain, again without tautology or circularity.
Petey, according the the gender police, there is no such thing as “chromosomal sex.” You have failed. No wonder the trans cult hates you.
BTW–I was assigned male at conception.
Mike — “BTW–I was assigned male at conception.” Me too, by God herself. :)
Not only that, but that which is asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.
He is wrong, right out of the gate.
It’s just flatly untrue that “everyone has a gender identity.” I don’t have one, have never had one, and don’t expect to ever have one. It’s indiscernible to me. Other things that are not discernible, not detectable, not perceptible — don’t exist.
The entire concept — as described by these pretentious *experts* themselves — is incoherent, irrational, self-contradictory, and meaningless. You can claim whatever you want about this phantom quality, but I don’t understand you and I don’t believe you. You say I can’t contradict your gender identity claim. Neither can you reject mine.
Bibble-babble is real.
We all have a bibble-babble. Mine is zymorth.
Xtrons’ bibble-babble is helmuth.
Trans xtrons have a bibble-babble that is not the same as their frommagoogal grths.
Their trans identity is different but equally valid as the helmuth identity of other xtrons.
We all have a sex*. Those of us that accept this simply call ourselves a man or a woman. Those that for whatever reason don’t accept this have invented a new thing they call a gender identity. We don’t all have one, in fact most people don’t bother with such silliness.
Oops, missing footnote:
Intersex people exist, but many of them can also be said to have a sex in the usual sense. For example, someone with complete androgen insensitivity disorder is female by virtue of having female external anatomy; the person would perceive herself as female as would all other people, until the anomalies were discovered… if they were discovered.
So does this count as adding to his his history of questionable statements, or simply the repetition of the one he’s made a whole bunch of times? Have got these kinds of details set down for the charge sheet on the next petition set up to cancel him.
In some ways it’s odd that trans activists want to keep Tatchell from speaking on trns views, because his statements have more truth to them, which is exactly what has got him into trouble. His voice, if he were to be replaced by an actual trans spokesperson, would be supplanted by someone more extreme and nonsensical than Tatchell.