The traditional understanding
A Seattle court has ruled that a female-only nude spa lacks the “constitutional right” to bar males from their facilities. The decision comes after the spa sued the Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC), which had forced them to change their sex-exclusive policy due to the complaint of a transgender patron.
Human rights are for trans people, especially male trans people. They’re not for women. Obviously.
In May of 2020, a trans-identified male submitted a complaint to the WSHRC alleging discrimination on the basis of his gender identity.
Haven Wilvich had sought a membership at the Olympus Spa in January of 2020, but had been denied on the basis that he had not undergone “gender reassignment” surgeries and his penis was fully intact.
So?????? He says he’s a woman, and that’s the only criterion.
…the WSHRC ruled that the spa had violated Washington anti-discrimination law, stating that the female-only policy “denies services to transgender women who have not had surgery … because their physical appearance is not ‘consistent’ with the traditional understanding of biological women.”
Well that’s dishonest manipulative bullshit. It’s not about “appearance” – the penis can be deployed to rape women, and that’s not actually a rare or astonishing circumstance. The point is not “Oh no he doesn’t look like our antiquated idea of a woman,” the point is “This is for women and he’s a man.”
Haven Wilvich, the trans-identified male whose complaint resulted in the loss of the female-only space, boasted about his success on Facebook after the initial WSHRC ruling.
He doesn’t look like that.
There are three (3) possibilities that occur to me about Haven Vitchvill, or Haven Itchyballs or whatever his name is: 1. He is a bloke dressed up as a woman; 2. He is a bloke dressed up as a woman; or 3. He is a bloke dressed up as a woman.
I’d say that it’s gotta be one of those three.
“The main naked lady spa in the area” – I’m honestly surprised he spelled it out so clearly.
Even though federal anti-discrimination laws give private businesses the right to refuse service to anyone, the laws also make exceptions for protected classes of people. Sex is in fact a protected class, and a business catering to women only should theoretically be able to sue this male person for the loss of business resulting from not being able to cater to women only. I think a majority of physicians (ones not captured by trans ideology, that is) could convincingly testify that this is a biological male in court and they could sue him for damages. This isn’t how it works in 2023 though, as the morons at the WSHRC and elsewhere are demonstrating. Yet another charming facet of the trans cult. These assholes are demanding anti-discrimination protection, but also demanding to be exempt from those very protections. It’s absolutely inequitable.
TDD — that line jumped out at me too.
Jesus, what a creep. Maybe have a special party for him at the spa and instead of naked ladies it’s a… demonstration of traditional Korean martial arts.
WITH KIMCHI.
Papito, they could also have, instead of naked ladies, naked TiMs. Intact ones. All standing around swinging their dicks. Wouldn’t that be jolly?
This is the ultimate result.
https://imgur.com/a/S0n99t8
PS, the above link will give an 18+ warning, it isn’t a porn image, it is a cartoon.
As long as I live, I don’t think I will ever get over how easily voyeurs and flashers got Human Rights organisations to fiercely go into court and represent their “right” to perve on women and get their penises out and not spend one moment representing the female half of humanity.
Arcadia – mission creep, got to keep the $$$ rolling in some how.
But, but, but, the purple hair. That definitely makes him a non-man.
@ Rev David, I don’t think mission creep is an adequate explanation. Or at least, there should be a separate term when pursuing mission 2 directly undermines the primary mission.