Starmer promises more forced teams
Diva magazine gloats that Starmer is going to demolish all women’s rights:
Keir Starmer promised that a Labour Government would bring about major improvements to LGBTQIA rights at home and abroad in his speech at the LGBT+ Labour event in Parliament this evening (29 January).
Can’t be done. Some of the claimed “rights” in that grab-bag cancel each other out. Lesbians’ right to say no to men, for example.
From modernising the Gender Recognition Act to banning so-called conversion “therapy”, the leader of the Labour Party drew on the Party’s long history with LGBTQIA rights to solidify his commitment to change.
What long history? There hasn’t been any long history of LGBTQIA rights, because the ever-expanding forced teaming is a very recent development.
The leader of the Labour Party also lamented the actions of the Conservative Party, claiming that they have stoked “culture wars” and “pitted people against each other”.
You know what else has “pitted people against each other”? Forced teaming, that’s what. The more the starmers insist that the T belongs with the L and the G the more the L and the G push back. There’s your pitting.
Of course this stupid article never once spells out exactly what TQIA rights are.
I do wonder what the odds are of Labour managing to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory at the next election. The Tories have been in power for nearly 14 years now and without a buffoon like Boris to pull in voters I think most people have lost interest in supporting them.
I don’t think enough normal people have realised how dangerous Gender Ideology is nor how fully it has captured the hearts and minds of most of Britain’s elites. Starmer could waltz in with a landslide and use that as justification for any number of TQ friendly policies that most people won’t see coming because all they wanted to do was get the Tories out and get some extra funding for public services.
I’m from Northern Ireland so my vote is highly unlikely to matter at all and for the first time in my life I’m not sure I want Labour to win convincingly. I hope their share of the womens vote drops and that polling suggests it’s because of their support for TQ weirdness.
Also the meaning of Q is uncertain: does it stand for ‘queer’, which was historically used as a code word for homosexual, or does it, as some say, stand for ‘questioning’ – as in a person questioning their sexuality?
‘Intersex people’, moreover, don’t exist; there are no actual hermaphrodites, only people with what the medics call ‘disorders of sex development’. There is no very obvious reason to link this group to LGB people, or T either, other than the desire of certain activist organisations to enlarge the constituency of people for whom they claim to speak. I suppose also the term ‘intersex’ helps to feed into the ideology of the trans movement, as gesturing towards the idea of groups outside the sex binary. Yet I am given to understand by experts who know their field that virtually all disorders of sex development pertain to one sex or the other.
The A is generally said to stand for ‘asexual’. Are people with no or very little experience of sexual attraction in need of a liberation movement? And even if they are, does it serve them politically to be co-opted into the ‘alphabet soup’, as some call it? I wouldn’t have thought so.
The so-called ‘LGBTQA+ community’ is not a community at all. It is a fiction invented by certain campaigners: gays and lesbians who had made a career out of campaigning and feared that they were running out of causes for which to fight, and transsexuals, who saw in the lesbian and gay movement a machine to advance their own cause. There was a certain amount of guilt-tripping also: ‘You have won your liberation: now help us with ours’.