Yeah there is.
Of course there is “one way” of being a woman, just as there is one way of being a doe, a cow, a mare, a hen, a sow, a vixen, a ewe.
There’s not one way of living while being a woman, but there is one way of just basically being-a-woman-not-a-man.
Comments
6 responses to “Obtuse yourself”
Demands simple answers? What is TWAW but a simple answer? The difference between that and our simple answer is that our answer is meaningful, because it states what a woman is, not a mantra they are repeating.
Reason #1,340,423 why trans ideology is a religion. Q. So how does that work, exactly? A. Oh, it’s too complicated to explain to the unenlightened, just take our word for it.
If there are lots of ways of ‘living as a woman’ (two be fair the comment only implied at least two) then is it possible that all this time I’ve been living as a woman but didn’t know it? Because if it can’t be described as what it is, then how do I know I’m not doing it – whatever ‘it’ is.
Maybe there aren’t any actual men at all? Maybe we’re all living as women, by virtue of being…alive?
Inability to answer the question is taken as proof that the answer to the question is complex.
There’s no winning with cult-think.
Then what justification is there for singling out certain ways (which “certain ways”?) of living as “living as a woman” in the first place? We didn’t claim there was such a thing, you did. And then you have the cheek to criticize others for asking you to clarify your claim? How is being/living as a “woman” different from not being/living as a “woman”? We have been told for years it has nothing to do with sexist stereotypes or male jerk-off fantasies. We’re never told what it does have “something to do with” or why we even need a word like “woman” in the first place. What are you saying about a person by referring to her as a “woman”? If you don’t know anything else about a person and somebody informs you she’s a “woman”, what do you now know that you didn’t know before? Why is it so vitally important to be called a “woman” if the only thing that distinguishes “women” from “non-women” is what they are called?
#4 Nullius
They also use the the exact opposite: if say a child agrees with the trans activist position, the fact that a child ‘understood’ the concept (i.e. parroted the mantras), this is taken as proof that the answer is obvious and understandable. “If even a 12 year old can understand this, then” etc.
Oh and naturally, if it is the feminist that does not know the answer to something, the rule disappears.