They seem curiously invested
The suspense continues.
Apparently to refer to Mr XX’s inverted penis as a ‘wound’ is sufficiently morally culpable to mean I have no article 10 protection.
I repeat: inverting your penis to line a surgically created cavity is not a ‘vagina’. It is a wound that will require persistent dilation so it does not close up. This is a fact. It is not harassment nor morally culpable to acknowledge this fact.
I will now forward this complaint to @SpeechUnion and await the BSB decision. Anything other than a dismissal will be challenged by me.
82 paragraphs is a lot of paragraphs.
“harm”
Misgendering = correctly sexing
Deadnaming = stating accurate historical information
Who tf is gaslighting whom?
I think the complainant is the noisome “Sophie Molly” (?)
Yes that’s the consensus. I recommend reading everything Sarah Phillimore has been saying. I’d share more of it here but I don’t want to be greedy.