Way too partial part two

The BBC is so shitty on this subject.

The campaign group Sex Matters, which backed Sandie Peggie in the case, said it was very disappointed in the approach taken by the tribunal.

Maya Forstater, the organisation’s CEO, said it should have provided employers with clarity regarding single-sex spaces and that should have meant giving them the confidence to refuse to let trans women use those spaces. She added: “It is a travesty that a woman can be judged as having expressed herself in the wrong way when she objects to finding a man in the women’s changing room.”

Ms Forstater said there was an “urgent” need for the Health and Safety Executive to provide clear guidance to employers regarding workplace toilets and changing rooms.

However, discrimination lawyer Robin Moira White – who works with Translucent, a trans-led advocacy and human rights organisation – said the ruling was a “very sensible, balanced judgement”. She said the tribunal had found that Sandie Peggie had harassed Dr Upton, not the other way around.

Oh look, there’s the BBC failing to say that Robin Moira White is a man who pretends to be a woman, and in fact calling her “she” which means that anybody who doesn’t know Robin Moira White is a man will get a very distorted view of the matter.

Ms White added: “It recognised that both trans people and gender critical people have rights in the workplace and employers have to balance those.”

Oh fuck off, dude. No employers don’t have to “balance” women’s right not to change clothes with men in the room and men’s right to watch women changing clothes. Just fuck all the way off.

Comments

5 responses to “Way too partial part two”

  1. Omar Avatar

    Could be that men who dress up as women have made it their business to get onto the BBC staff and get into jobs there which give them an undue influence on policy. Just a suggestion, mind. Even though I am a trans-giraffe (pronouns: gronk, snoooort, eyore) and not a trans-donkey, I would hate to upset any apple carts.

  2. Acolyte of Sagan Avatar
    Acolyte of Sagan

    From an earlier BBC article giving live coverage of the tribunal’s ruling yesterday:

    The events on Christmas Eve have been disputed, but the tribunal says that the evidence of Dr Upton should be preferred. It describes the doctor as a more credible witness, and says Ms Peggie questioned Dr Upton in a “intrusive and confrontational” way.

    How on Earth did they decide that a man who can’t even be honest about his sex makes for the more credible witness? Couldn’t be because Sandie Peggie is just a working class woman and therefore inherently dishonest while Dr. Upton, being a man in the same social class as the tribunal’s panel, is honest by default, could it?

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cpd619q851vt

  3. iknklast Avatar

    AoS, it just goes back to that old adage. You need one witness if it’s a man, two if it’s a woman! Good old sexism rears its ugly head.

  4. Lady Mondegreen Avatar
    Lady Mondegreen

    Omar

    Could be that men who dress up as women have made it their business to get onto the BBC staff and get into jobs there which give them an undue influence on policy.

    You might have something there, Omar.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5905129/BBC-chief-stunned-secret-staff-sex-survey-reveals-417-workers-transgender.html

  5. Omar Avatar

    Lady M: Holy sufferin’ catfish.!

    The BBC has more than 400 transgender staff, a confidential internal survey has revealed.

    The figure represents more than one in 50 of the workforce – about four times higher than the proportion in the population at large.

    And it stunned the BBC executive behind the research, who described the total number of trans employees, at 417, as ‘very, very high’.

    “Very, very high” all right. As in ‘stinks to high Heaven.’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *