What to say
It’s so very blatant. Instead of saying the true thing, say this manipulative lie.
I especially like the ones where they just delete “women” and substitute something completely different. Yes we know, thanks for documenting.
Tip Jar
It’s so very blatant. Instead of saying the true thing, say this manipulative lie.
I especially like the ones where they just delete “women” and substitute something completely different. Yes we know, thanks for documenting.
So funny, didn’t TRAs fight very hard for the assertion “sex and gender are different”, and didn’t they invent the expressions “people with a penis/vagina/uterus”, “people who identify as women”, “people who identify as men”, and maybe also “natal sex”, “trans women”, and “trans men”? And now they’re telling us not to say them.
I am more than willing not to say ‘biological women’ or ‘natal women’. I think ‘women’ is adequate to cover it, and applies only to those groups, so ‘biological women’ is redundant. I always and ever try and attempt to eradicate and abolish all redundancies and repetitive things.
Heh, good plan, fine idea, quality concept, benign intention.
Yes, because it’s all about the telling. We MUST not be allowed to choose our own words.
On their “don’t you think it’s creepy to obsess over strangers genitalia?”, don’t they think it’s creepy to force your male genitalia into spaces where vulnerable people (women and children) have made abundantly clear it’s not wanted?
Arcadia, they know full well that it’s creepy, intrusive and rapey to force their male genitalia into spaces it’s not wanted. That’s the entire point for them: the utter destruction of any boundaries which other people might reasonably erect against them. So, of course, there being no reasonable objection to those boundaries, they have to attempt to bamboozle everyone by accusing women and children of the very motives which compel the cross-dressing creeps.
By the way, the only objection I have to men cross-dressing is solely where a man is doing so in order to cross women’s boundaries, to mock women and/or to deprive women of the right to be anywhere without him getting there first. There was a bit of a tradition in a village in which I lived in England, where men would dress as women to collect money for charity. You know the sort of thing – photos sometimes appear on Facebook posts, accusing gender critical adults of being hypocritical for accepting that, but objecting to ‘trans’. Nobody had a problem with it because the men weren’t mocking women, weren’t pretending to be women, and certainly weren’t invading the women’s toilets, taking women’s places in shortlists and sports, or perving on women in hospital, changing rooms and shelters. Nor were they demanding that we address them by fake female names or refer to them by the wrong pronouns, still less that everyone else profess to believe that a change of clothes had magically changed their sex.