Woman’s Hour bites its own legs off
Godalmighty. Woman’s Hour today had Kate Barker, CEO of LGB Alliance, on to explain why lesbians are quite pleased about the Supreme Court ruling.
Nuala McGovern: Now you’ve described this ruling as a watershed moment for women and in particular for lesbians; why?
Barker describes the joy and relief of that day
I don’t think people understand just quite how tough it’s been for lesbians over the last ten-fifteen years – I really would characterize it as a kind of dark age for lesbians, and the reason for that is that the LGBTQ+ lobby groups have been encouraging men to self-identify as lesbians, and those men just haven’t taken no for an answer, in terms of trying to access women’s spaces, women’s support services, women’s social groups. So it’s been really really difficult, and an example I suppose that people might understand quite easily is dating apps. So we all use dating apps now don’t we, it’s a common part of everyday life. If you go onto a lesbian dating app you’ll find that 20% plus of the people on that app are men – I’m using the word “men” in the sense that you and I – they’re men-men –
McGovern breaks in –
Well let’s talk about that particular term “men” that you use.
Yes she actually says that – apparently with a straight face. A woman who presents Woman’s Hour on the BBC says to the lesbian guest “Well let’s talk about that particular term ‘men’ that you use.” As if it’s some weird specialized jargon, some tendentious peculiar pejorative thing to say. What are we supposed to call them? What’s the permissible word now? Do we need to warn the audience before we say it? What does “Woman’s Hour” even mean???
Deep breaths. Push the play button again. McGovern, slowly and distinctly: “Who are you referring to?”
Fucking hell. Can you imagine being KB in that moment? It would be so tempting to shout: “This is Woman’s Hour; who are you referring to you brainless subservient buffoon?!!”
KB was admirably disciplined.
I’m referring to all male people.
McGovern asks, slowly and ponderously, “Are you also referring to those who identify as trans women?”
KB: I am.
NM: Why.
KB: Well I think a dating app is a good example of why. So – consider the dating app, the lesbian dating app – the sort of people, however you want to describe them, they’re male, born male in male bodies – now I’m a lesbian and I go onto that dating app – my criterion is – well I would prefer to meet somebody without a penis – because I’m a lesbian. If I go onto the app and try to set up my profile and say “I’d like to meet somebody, oh I don’t know, female, or somebody who’s a biological woman – a real woman, in my mind, I’d be booted off the app and the man would be allowed to stay. And the reason for that is my position would be considered bigoted and unkind and transphobic, but most importantly, it would be considered to be Not Inclusive. And I think that’s worth looking at, for a second. So, me – and other women, as lesbians, we’ll assert our boundaries, and that boundary will exclude male people from our dating pool. But that position, in and of itself, is deemed to be a transphobic position…The same thing is happening for gay men as well, that if you assert your exclusive same-sex orientation – homosexuality – that is considered to be something which is “not inclusive” and which is bigoted and transphobic so that’s why we as an organization were celebrating and cracking open the champagne. You know because it allows us to – we can’t do our work as an organization unless we can clarify so what does sex mean –
McGovern breaks in there:
Well let’s talk about these aspects, and some of course that are listening may find what you’re saying very offensive
Hey guess what Nuala McGovern, I find what you’re saying very offensive. I find the fact that you’re saying it very offensive. I find this sick joke of a program called Woman’s Hour contorting itself to bully women for saying that men are men VERY OFFENSIVE.
and some of course that are listening may find what you’re saying very offensive – do you ever use the term “trans woman”?
What kind of question is that? Are we required to use it? Socially, morally, be kindly? Why is BBC Woman’s Hour scolding a lesbian for calling men men instead of calling men trans women? I would really like to know!
The rest later, if I have the stomach for it.

I’m going to go out on a limb here and suggest that if 20% of the “people” on the lesbian dating app are men trying to hook up with women, it follows that 80% are women who are not interested in hooking up with men — quite a few of whom might find the idea… off-putting. Might it be worth bringing this to the dating app’s attention?
A bit of info on the real numbers in thrall to this crap – https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/05/19/trans-activists-are-in-a-tiny-minority/
So glad to have found your blog where people can post without having to pay, or even register! (Sick of all the substack solicitation schemes – share because you want to or don’t bother!) I would love if there was some sort of thumbs up/down widget for comments, but other than that it’s terrific. Thanks
The rest later, if I have the stomach for it.
I would be interested to hear your further comments.
@1 I remember hearing a very enlightening conversation about this on a podcast. As KB said in the interview excerpt, women are not even asking for the men to be removed from the app, they’re asking for the ability to filter them out of their matches. Someone said this to a representative of a dating app, and she answered ‘we believe everyone has the right to use the service.’ Wait, I thought – no one’s saying these men don’t have the right to use the service, they’re just asking to be able to look at only women for matches. Then it dawned on me – when the representative talked about ‘using the service’…access to unwilling women IS the service.
Welcome to Women’s Hour. Now let’s talk about something important. Mens feelings.
For the unenlightened, who is BJ?
Bev Jackson. I somehow got it into my head this morning that she was the guest, and corrected my mistake some hours later. Sorry for the confuse. I must have caught it from Nuala McGovern.
Weird. I would swear I wrote “enthrall” which is the correct spelling of that. I even checked that it could be spelled with one l or two.
“access to unwilling women IS the service” – bingo