a white, cis woman from the UK

Colin Wright tells us:

This new academic paper claims that J.K. Rowling has essentially become Voldemort via her “celebrified transphobia,” which is apparently the authors’ term for Rowling publicly acknowledging basic biology.

It argues that the “Wizarding World should be considered a cultural field” whose defining principle is “trans/queer inclusivity,” and says Rowling’s views have “significantly depleted her once-elite status.”

This is an academic paper? It’s not a nerdy hobby for nerdy hobbyists but an actual paper in an academic field?

It says Harry Potter has been read as “resisting binary gendering” and presenting gender as “varied, easily shifting, exploratory, and ‘slippery,’” with the Wizarding World offering trans and queer fans “identification and community” and “a ‘place of belonging.’”

So Rowling became the moral equivalent of her own villain because some readers projected gender ideology onto the books, then felt shocked when the author turned out to believe sex is real.

And in case the paper was not absurd enough already, its conclusion declares: “You’re a muggle, Joanne.”

That’s Ms Rowling to you pathetic goons.

Ooooh a prestigious global celebrity – what a very academic and scholarly observation.

There are ways academics could educate us about JKR and/or her work, but this isn’t one of them.

Comments

3 responses to “a white, cis woman from the UK”

  1. Mostly Cloudy Avatar
    Mostly Cloudy

    “Queer fans ?” What is a “Queer” person nowadays? I’m told that “People of all sexualities may identify as queer.”

    It seems to mean BDSM enthusiasts, foot fetishists, and people in “Open marriages” can now call themselves “queer”.

    Joe Bloggs, the middle-class white male who only fancies women, can now designate himself “queer” and hence marginalized…because he and his girlfriend don’t do IT in the missionary position.

  2. Freemage Avatar

    Yeah, near as I can tell, if a straight couple keeps a pair of fuzzy handcuffs in the bedstand that they used once on their anniversary and then never again because it really didn’t do much for them, they’re still able to say they’re queer.

    Honestly, the word’s gone on a helluva journey. It started as a slur against gay men, only. And when I say ‘slur’, I mean that there was a popular playground game among pre-teen boys called “Smear the Queer”, where the goal was to be the guy with the ball (the ‘queer’), but not get dog-piled by every other boy on the playground. Fail to get rid of it in time, and you ended up eating dirt, pavement or gravel (depending on your school’s playground composition). It essentially was training in homophobic violence.

    Then gay men such as Dan Savage pushed a campaign to ‘reclaim’ the word, much as African-Americans reclaimed the n-word. Sometime during that process, it also began to encompass lesbians and bisexuals.

    But whereas the n-word campaign wound up with a word that black folks could use, but whites still pretty much ended up coming across as racist, the effort to reclaim ‘queer’ left is as simply an acceptable term to describe anyone under the LGB label.

    At this point, most ‘out’ trans-identified males were also homosexual. So they kept the term, even as they also pushed to expand the meaning of ‘trans’ be a giant umbrella covering transvestites, transsexuals, drag queens, etc. (At the earliest stages of the trans movement, I often saw them arguing vociferously against the idea that all these groups were the same; transsexuals, in particular, maintained that they were not fetishists like the transvestites, nor performers like the drag queens. That distinction has been abandoned.)

    The decision to graft the T onto LGB meant that queer should’ve just died a quiet death–or at most, it should’ve been an alternate term for “LGBT”. But then came the push to make as many as people as possible members of ‘the community’. Expanding (and thus watering down) the definition of Queer to mean anything and everything (and thus nothing) was the perfect way to do that.

  3. iknklast Avatar

    So, Freemage, since I am a scientist and my husband is a librarian (switching traditional gender-role jobs), I suppose I could say we are queer? If I wanted to, that is…which I don’t.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *