Again. Same problem. How is awareness of very basic facts “bias”? Surely the denial of very basic facts is a better candidate for accusations of bias.

A health official who reportedly intervened to pause a clinical trial on the use of puberty blockers has been removed from any further involvement due to accusations of bias.

Prof Jacob George, who was appointed chief medical and scientific officer at the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in January, raised concerns that led to the Pathways trial being put on hold by the government, according to the Sunday Times.

But the regulator announced on Saturday that George would recuse himself from involvement in the trial after gender-critical social media posts made last year emerged.

But what is meant by “gender-critical” here is knowing that men are not women and vice versa. You might as well call it bias to know that humans have hands and feet.

The MHRA said that although George’s posts were made before his appointment, he had been removed from involvement in the trial as a precaution.

Yes, it’s very precaution to remove the guy who doesn’t claim that men are women if they say they are.