Guest post: That’s where it blows up

Originally a comment by Dave Ricks at Miscellany Room.

Yesterday (March 19, 2026), the Danish Broadcasting Corporation (DR) reported on the military “exercise” called “Arctic Endurance” in Greenland that started in January 2026, and will continue at a lower level for the rest of the year. I used Google Translate to read these two articles:

The battle for Greenland

Denmark prepared for possible attack from the US: Flew bags of blood to Greenland and prepared to blow up runways

Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now telling for the first time what happened in the most critical days when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way”.

The battle for Greenland

ANALYSIS Behind the word ‘exercise’ in Greenland [, hidden blood and explosives,] and the most serious situation since April 9, 1940

It’s one thing to have a marital breakdown, it’s quite another to file for divorce. That’s why “Arctic Endurance” was carefully described as an ‘exercise’.

My quotes are from the first article, which is long and detailed:

• DR explains their sources [italics mine] — “The story is based on 12 central sources at the top of the Danish government, the Armed Forces and central sources in our closest allied countries in Europe, whom DR has spoken to since Donald Trump’s statements about Greenland in December 2024. The information is confirmed by at least two, but typically significantly more, independent sources. The sources assess that the situation around Greenland remains so tense and sensitive that they can only speak anonymously. DR has also verified the information with other sources who have had insight into parts of the process.”

• DR explains the timing [italics mine] — “Eight of DR’s sources describe one triggering factor in particular: the morning of January 3, 2026, when they woke up to the news that the United States had attacked Venezuela and removed the country’s president. That’s where it blows up, says a high-ranking source in the Danish security apparatus. … When Trump keeps saying he wants to take over Greenland, and then what happened in Venezuela happened, we had to take all scenarios seriously, says the source. The source also says that the assessment of the threat of a takeover of Greenland included “the fact that the official US is not functioning as usual”: Trump doesn’t have the same level of people around him as before who would talk him out of it. It’s super dangerous.

• DR lists five countries involved — “With little delay, an advance command with Danish, French, German, Norwegian and Swedish soldiers was first flown to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq. Immediately after, a main force followed, including soldiers from the Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro, elite soldiers from the Jægerkorps and French alpine hunters trained for war in cold, mountainous areas. At the same time, Danish fighter planes and a French naval vessel were sent towards the North Atlantic.”

• DR explains the point [italics mine] — “The goal of having soldiers on land in Greenland — with as many different flags on their shoulders as possible — was, according to six of the sources, so that the Americans would be forced to take a major hostile action if Donald Trump actually wanted to occupy Greenland militarily. That should deter the US from even trying. … All this even though none of DR’s sources had any illusions that it would be possible to hold out against an American attack. “The cost to the US would have to be raised. The US would have to carry out a hostile act to get Greenland,” says a high-ranking Danish defense source about the historic defense plan that could have plunged Denmark into conflict with our most important ally since World War II.”

• DR explains their article subtitles about blood and explosives — “For regular military exercises, where the purpose is to train with allies, blood and explosives are not packed, defense sources say. On the contrary, it is part of the procedure when preparing for a possible attack. Several other sources confirm to DR that the dispatch of soldiers to Greenland was about preparing a real defense of the Commonwealth.”

Comments

3 responses to “Guest post: That’s where it blows up”

  1. Bjarte Foshaug Avatar
    Bjarte Foshaug

    The only thing that annoys me more than Americans referring to the democracies of Europe as “allies” of Trump’s America these days is when the Europeans themselves are doing it. I still consider the probability that the U.S. is going to attack us to be vastly greater than the probability that they are going to rise to our defense in the case of a Russian attack. After all, that latter probability is practically zero. With friends like that, who needs enemies.

    Even before Trump was elected back in 2016 – by the time it was becoming clear that he stood a real chance of winning the primaries – the democracies of Europe, as well as Japan, South-Korea etc. should have been working on Plan B. There was never an excuse for considering Trump’s first victory a “fluke”. Taking Biden’s victory in 2020 as evidence that everything was back to “normal” was outright criminal negligence. The fact that all the supposedly career-ending scandals of Trump’s first term didn’t prevent him from gaining votes between 2016 and 2020 should have come as a major clue. As should the fact that one of the two large parties collectively decided to stick with Trump after January 6th and go along with the big lie of the stolen election. And now Europeans are acting “shocked” and “baffled” that Trump is no more decent or reliable or sane than he pretended to be? Where the fuck have they been for the last ten years?

  2. Athel Cornish-Bowden Avatar
    Athel Cornish-Bowden

    I completely agree with Bjarte. One of the things that has puzzled and shocked me since Trump first rose to prominence has been the unwillingness of many French journalists, supposedly expert on foreign affairs, to recognize what sort of person he is. They insist on discussing his pronouncements as if they are the product of a rational mind. One can forgive leading politicians (Macron etc.) to do the same because they have no choice, but journalists have no excuse for pretending that Trump’s lies are anything but what they are.

  3. iknklast Avatar

    There does seem to be an inability to recognize that you cannot analyze Trump’s win, or his presidency, using the same metrics we’ve always used. The media, and other governments, continue to try analyzing this, and him, as though it could be figured out using the same methods we’ve always used to analyze politicians.

    It probably seems incomprehensible to many people overseas (I know it does here, and we’re living in it) that so many US voters could be totally out of their minds. It never surprised me, growing up in red America, because so many of the people I knew were somewhere out in deep delusional territory (to the right). My first trip to San Francisco was a shocker, because I’m so used to right wing outbursts and ridiculous theories (which, I realize, people in California are prone to, as well – the ridiculous theories I mean).

    For all my life, I have been surrounded by people convinced that the government is out to get them, that liberals hate America, that immigrants are all dangerous criminals, and that the only way to solve our problems was with guns and bombs. In this age of the internet, they all got together and elected Donald Trump. And I am not among those who felt he would be a bridge too far for the religious right; they are, first and foremost, opportunists. They are only moralists when it comes to other people’s lives and thoughts, and when it is them, or those they support, they are very capable of not noticing what the other hand is doing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *