Interesting use of the word hysterical there. There’s a lot of money to be made exploiting and abusing people as it happens, women and girls in particular.
And there is no frenzy to punish him, he did that himself with a noose (allegedly). Those who are in a frenzy are those reticent collaborators with something to hide, and those with nothing to hide but want to continue to benefit monetarily from their exploitation and abuse. Like you Lawrence.
Epstein is dead. He can’t be punished; I don’t even see any beating-a-dead-horse theatrics here.
We do have evidence that many prominent and powerful men enabled Epstein, protected Epstein, did business with Epstein, and in some cases did crimes with Epstein. There is a growing call for these men now to be held to account.
It’s not hysterical and it’s not a frenzy. It is retroactive, but only in the ordinary law-enforcement sense that the crime comes before the trial. It is not ex post facto: these things were absolutely crimes when they were done.
Isn’t this a violation of the First Law of Holes In Which You Let Sleeping Streisand Effect Dogs Lie?
Isn’t this just a rerun of the argument about museums taking Sackler money?
Interesting use of the word hysterical there. There’s a lot of money to be made exploiting and abusing people as it happens, women and girls in particular.
And there is no frenzy to punish him, he did that himself with a noose (allegedly). Those who are in a frenzy are those reticent collaborators with something to hide, and those with nothing to hide but want to continue to benefit monetarily from their exploitation and abuse. Like you Lawrence.
What a callous attitude toward the victims.
Well, no.
Epstein is dead. He can’t be punished; I don’t even see any beating-a-dead-horse theatrics here.
We do have evidence that many prominent and powerful men enabled Epstein, protected Epstein, did business with Epstein, and in some cases did crimes with Epstein. There is a growing call for these men now to be held to account.
It’s not hysterical and it’s not a frenzy. It is retroactive, but only in the ordinary law-enforcement sense that the crime comes before the trial. It is not ex post facto: these things were absolutely crimes when they were done.