No.
No it doesn’t. “That’s a man” does not draw inappropriate attention to anyone’s genitals.
Often in the sense of never
Comments
4 responses to “Often in the sense of never”
-
Euan might be thinking of the last time he was letting it all hang out in a women’s changeroom. Maybe someone pointed and laughed?
-
He too transparently lets his fetish hang right out – he pretends to be a woman because his wet dream is that he’ll be sexually harassed. He’s disappointed it still hasn’t happened.
-
Context matters here, too. If we’re talking about men in women’s spaces, where the women get all or partially undressed, then
(1) pointing out that there’s a man in the women’s changing room draws appropriate attention to his genitals; and
(2) that’s what he is there for: he is the one calling inappropriate attention to his genitals. It’s an implied rape threat, wagging his weenie around in front of the women. That’s the point. That’s what’s fun about transgender ideology.
-
I encountered this thinking constantly when FTB permitted arguments on this topic. I can’t tell if it is bad faith (deliberately casting the other person as ‘obsessed with genitals’ despite knowing they are not) or bad thought (actually believing talking of sex necessarily means thinking of genitals). Either way, they are dobbing on themselves.
Leave a Reply