Quakers reaffirm commitment to exclusion of women

Quakers proudly announce they’re forcing women to share their facilities with men.

Under the arrangements confirmed by trustees, toilet facilities labelled with a ‘female’ sign remain available to cisgender women, trans women, and others for whom those facilities best align with their lived experience.

Similarly, facilities labelled with a ‘male’ sign remain available to cisgender men, trans men, and others for whom those facilities best align with their lived experience.

By which it does not mean facilities for trans people, but facilities for non-trans people who will be forced to share them with people of the other sex.

The statement sets out principles that inform the approach to toilets on Quakers in Britain’s premises.

These include respecting the dignity and lived experience of every person, ensuring compliance with the Equality Act, protecting disabled people’s access to accessible facilities, and maintaining robust approaches to tackling harassment or discrimination.

The policy also states that Quakers will not require trans, non-binary or intersex people to disclose or prove their status in circumstances where such evidence is not demanded of others.

Under the arrangements confirmed by trustees, toilet facilities labelled with a ‘female’ sign remain available to cisgender women, trans women, and others for whom those facilities best align with their lived experience.

In other words they’re mixed toilet facilities whether you bitches like it or not, so there, bitches.

Comments

4 responses to “Quakers reaffirm commitment to exclusion of women”

  1. Sumi Avatar

    Can we expect a new wave of Quaker immigrants to the US?

  2. Omar Avatar

    Under the arrangements confirmed by trustees, toilet facilities labelled with a ‘female’ sign remain available to cisgender women, trans women, and others for whom those facilities best align with their lived experience.

    Also included in the above are dick flashers, exhibitionists, attention-seekers of all kinds, rapists (male-born variety especially well-catered for) and those who desire a bit of female comfort; not to be confused with comfort of females.

    Coming (and we mean in every sense of the term) ready or not. Until then, quake on.

  3. Holms Avatar

    Interesting that they claim to be doing this in a way that complies with the Equality Act, given the supreme court ruling stating the Equality Act refers to the female sex when it references women.

  4. tigger_the_wing Avatar
    tigger_the_wing

    I agree with Holms; merely declaring that they are complying with the Equality Act doesn’t impose any obligation on anyone else to believe them.

    They can, and will, I hope, be sued for breaking the law.

    Continuing to follow the illegal advice from Stonewall UK and others will not be mitigation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *