What exactly are we talking about here?
What is the question here?
The question is whether there is such a thing as a right to manifest gender critical beliefs. What beliefs are those? The belief that women are women, and the corresponding belief that men are men.
It seems very odd to ask if there is such a thing as a right to assert obvious basic impersonal facts. Why would there not be such a right?
What are called “gender critical beliefs” aren’t really beliefs as generally understood. They’re just facts, and very fundamental facts at that. Every single human who lives or has ever lived has been the product of a woman. Humans exist because women are women.
Trans ideology’s role in life is to pretend that those facts are contested and that there are valid and/or reasonable explanations of why they are contested. Hungry narcissists who get a lot of attention via pretending that some men are women and vice versa want us to believe that their game of let’s pretend is sacred and precious and vulnerable to the slightest dissent.
What kind of world would it be if we were not allowed to say that men are not women? If saying that were a crime, and we could be imprisoned for that crime? That’s what Euan Weddell is pushing for here.
Leave a Reply