Unlawfully trample
The struggle to stamp out women’s rights in Scotland continues.
SNP ministers are seeking a legal ruling declaring that implementing the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling on sex would unlawfully trample on the human rights of transgender criminals.
While not implementing the court’s ruling on sex would merely trample on the human rights of women, and that obviously doesn’t matter at all. Women are garbage, while transgender criminals are infinitely sacred and precious and valuable.
Despite repeatedly insisting in public that they accept the judgment of Britain’s top court in April, ministers have privately requested that Scotland’s top civil court issues a “declaration of incompatibility” which would severely undermine it, if its other legal arguments fail.
Privately, as in secretly and mendaciously.
A declaration, if granted, would state that removing biologically male prisoners who say they identify as female from women’s jails would amount to an unlawful breach of their human rights and throw UK-wide equalities laws into chaos.
While not removing biologically male prisoners would amount to unlawful harming of women, which doesn’t matter at all.
The stance has led FWS to launch a fresh legal case, seeking to have the Scottish prison service’s controversial policy, previously rewritten after the Isla Bryson scandal, ruled unlawful.
Honestly what’s all this fuss about being locked up with violent misogynist male criminals? Women are such weaklings.
This crock of shit will obviously stew away until the first female prisoner is raped, murdered or otherwise seriously assaulted by some bloke who is booked in as ‘transgender,’ and is under the additional delusion that, like Agent 007 (James Bond) he has a licence to kill, and/or otherwise do as he pleases. Only then will the faeces hit the fan; in the land of Robbie Burns, William Wallace, Flora MacDonald, and Bonnie Prince Charlie..
Until? First? It’s already happened. Not just once.
OB, has it happened in the UK?
OBL Apologies. I missed that/them. Did you post on that.? url ref?
Omar, Colin —
It’s Wikipedia, so it’s biased towards teh trans and against women. They quote someone claiming the case drew attention because of “anti-trans rhetoric.” Yeah well thank Jebus for such rhetoric, without it we might not have heard a thing about it. There are cases pending here in the US that receive little if any attention from the news media.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_White_case
(Yes, O posted about Karen White and others!)
Thanks Lady M – I was out all afternoon, walking the Arboretum in the freezing cold, so not doing Omar’s research for him.
Lady M: I never doubted for one minute that if some rapist had used the opportunities entry into women-only facilities offered him, that our hostess Ophelia Benson of this site would have been rapidly onto it. It is just that I was not aware that it had actually happened somewhere. That cited Wikipedia article accepts that White is/was female, as in:
[My bold type. Wikipedia apparently accepts this bloke’s chosen sexual identity. – Omar.]