The struggle to stamp out women’s rights in Scotland continues.
SNP ministers are seeking a legal ruling declaring that implementing the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling on sex would unlawfully trample on the human rights of transgender criminals.
While not implementing the court’s ruling on sex would merely trample on the human rights of women, and that obviously doesn’t matter at all. Women are garbage, while transgender criminals are infinitely sacred and precious and valuable.
Despite repeatedly insisting in public that they accept the judgment of Britain’s top court in April, ministers have privately requested that Scotland’s top civil court issues a “declaration of incompatibility” which would severely undermine it, if its other legal arguments fail.
Privately, as in secretly and mendaciously.
A declaration, if granted, would state that removing biologically male prisoners who say they identify as female from women’s jails would amount to an unlawful breach of their human rights and throw UK-wide equalities laws into chaos.
While not removing biologically male prisoners would amount to unlawful harming of women, which doesn’t matter at all.
The stance has led FWS to launch a fresh legal case, seeking to have the Scottish prison service’s controversial policy, previously rewritten after the Isla Bryson scandal, ruled unlawful.
Honestly what’s all this fuss about being locked up with violent misogynist male criminals? Women are such weaklings.
Leave a Reply