That’s right! It says so right here in the Gospel of St. Science-Based 3:12-15
Q.E.D.
Holms
I remember seeing arguments about the list of errors pointed out by Singal. The trans activists were complaining that some of the misquotes he points to were too trivial to bother with – a difference of only a couple of words sometimes. They were actually angry that he pointed to such misquotes and called them misquotes, even while conceding that their wording was indeed inaccurate.
Science based!
Michael Haubrich
This is how he deals with substantive responses, and then he deflects by referring to gender criticals as being awful people, shrill and nasty.
Disrepsectful Insolence.
Bjarte Foshaug
If you already accept that trans women are just another kind of women, it’s not such a leap to accept that pseudoscience is just another kind of science. Anything that identifies as science is science, right?.
GW
And impoliteness is just another form of politeness, right?
Comments
5 responses to “Based”
That’s right! It says so right here in the Gospel of St. Science-Based 3:12-15
Q.E.D.
I remember seeing arguments about the list of errors pointed out by Singal. The trans activists were complaining that some of the misquotes he points to were too trivial to bother with – a difference of only a couple of words sometimes. They were actually angry that he pointed to such misquotes and called them misquotes, even while conceding that their wording was indeed inaccurate.
Science based!
This is how he deals with substantive responses, and then he deflects by referring to gender criticals as being awful people, shrill and nasty.
Disrepsectful Insolence.
If you already accept that trans women are just another kind of women, it’s not such a leap to accept that pseudoscience is just another kind of science. Anything that identifies as science is science, right?.
And impoliteness is just another form of politeness, right?