The manipulation continues

All the headlines say “transgender” players instead of “male” players. Every damn one.

Women’s Pool Final Played by Two Transgender Athletes

Two male transgender players. The male bit is important and should be in the headline and the lede. It’s the women’s final and two men played it.

Two transgender players faced-off in the final of a women’s championship pool match on Sunday—adding fuel to the fiery social debate surrounding trans athletes’ participation in women’s sports.

Harriet Haynes and Lucy Smith, who were both assigned male at birth, fought for the title at the Ultimate Pool Women’s Pro Series Event 2 in Wigan in the UK this weekend.

Harriet Haynes and Lucy Smith, who are both men, fought for the title.

Newsweek goes on to distort the argument.

Critics argue trans women cannot compete on an even playing field because they have an unfair advantage, particularly if the trans sportswomen have undergone male puberty. Some also have safety concerns, including fears that women could be at risk of serious injury in the boxing ring or in other contact sports.

However, others argue that trans athletes should enjoy the same opportunity to participate in sport as anyone else, and insist that trans’ rights are simply human rights.

See it? Pretty brazen. Trans athletes do enjoy the same opportunity to participate in sport as anyone else. Men don’t have an “opportunity” to compete in women’s sport, because women’s sport is for women. That’s the same for all men: that’s the same opportunity.

4 Responses to “The manipulation continues”