You you you no not you
Extras for everyone except women. Women are the privileged class you know. Bitches and Karens all of them.
An amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill that would introduce tougher sentences for hate crimes committed against LGBT people and people with disabilities is being backed by East Thanet MP Polly Billington.
The new law, if passed by MPs, would make serious crimes motivated by prejudice against anyone because of their disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity “aggravated” offenses – as is currently the case for hate crimes motivated by race or religion. Aggravated offenses carry tougher sentences for perpetrators.
Got that?
Disability, sexual orientation, genner idenniny, race, religion.
But not sex. No extras for women: women don’t need extras and women don’t deserve extras. Women are privileged and women are bad.
Is that clear?
Well, women have been coddled for far too long, amiright? Give’em the right to vote, and what thanks do we get? Just more demands to play an equal part in society, have equal jobs and pay, yada yada yada. We all know that genner idenniny and its single-digits years-long storied history trumps anything as basic as biological sex and many millenia of discrimination against women.
/spit
Thank you, James. I’ve no idea how you managed to get everything into one concise paragraph; it’s brilliant! Hats off to you, sir!
I suspect that the mundane reason for omitting sex from any expansion of the (wholly unnecessary, in my opinion) ‘hate’ label is that almost all crimes against women are committed by men, and motivated by hatred. There have to be exceptions in motivation for the label to make any sense – perhaps theft from a white person really is less traumatic, and should be punished with a lighter sentence, than theft from a brown person; if the prosecution can prove to the judge that the crime was committed because the thief hates brown people.
I believe that the entire notion is legal codswallop, and is fomenting discord between people of different ethnicity where it didn’t exist before.
tigger:
The seven deadly sins, in order of increasing severity according to Pope Gregory I, are lust, gluttony, greed, sloth, wrath, envy, and pride. Leaving aside gluttony, greed, and sloth, on the grounds that they are practiced by both sexes (differing perhaps in degree) we see that hatred arguably emerges via wrath and envy. IMHO there is nothing wrong with pride (in say, achievement) as long as it does not involve contempt for the less successful.
As for wrath and envy, those two tend to go together. My own mother was an achiever, and had been both an actress, journalist and writer before her marriage and the birth of me. My father, on the other hand, was a man almost totally lacking in initiative, and spent most of his working life running a business founded and run successfully for years by his own mother. He manifested his own rage and frustration over this by frequently making fun of my mother and putting her down in conversation with others. In due course, he became a wife-basher as well, drove her to alcoholism and eventual divorce proceedings, and in large part, wrecked my own childhood. (Having to watch, as a child, one’s father bashing up one’s mother, can be something of a life-changing event.)
Which leaves us with lust, known first-hand by popes and lesser clergy and numerous others according to the non-fake news. Where a normal sexual attraction and sex-drive stop and lust begins is somewhat debateable.
.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_deadly_sins