No they don’t

UN Women:

Also UN Women:

You do the math.

Comments

5 responses to “No they don’t”

  1. Mosnae Avatar

    “All LGBTIQ+ Women Are Women”

    Ah yes, of course, because a same-sex attracted woman being called a man is suffering from the same prejudice as a man being called a man.

    Anyways, why do they think there’s both an L and a G? What do they think the G stands for?

  2. Bjarte Foshaug Avatar
    Bjarte Foshaug

    …the world’s 4 billion women and girls

    Oh yeah? How do you know? As I keep saying, if “Chase” Strangio (or “Elliot” Page, or “Buck” Angel, or Dr. “Stephen” Whittle) is a “man” then I’m not. You cannot define that person in whithout defining me out. After all you have just taken the only thing that made me a man out of the definition of “man” while at the same time putting in a whole bunch of other crap (about what’s supposed to be going on inside your head if you’re a “man”) that doesn’t apply to me at all.

    By the same logic, how do you know that those 4 billion people still qualify as “women” or “girls” after you have taken the “biological female” part out of the definition of “woman”/”girl” and put in the part about thinking / feeling / identifying / “presenting” (etc.) like “Lia” Thomas, “Veronica” Ivy, “India” Willoughby, and Eddie Izzard?

  3. Southwest88 Avatar

    Funny how they use a photo of a woman to portray women and a CARTOON drawing to portray “trans women” which is, well, makes sense in a way.

  4. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    Oh it totally makes sense. The cartoon makes the animal brain think “woman”. A photo would not. Cartoons can make it convincing, photography can’t.

  5. Your Name's not Bruce? Avatar
    Your Name’s not Bruce?

    Funny how they use a photo of a woman to portray women and a CARTOON drawing to portray “trans women” which is, well, makes sense in a way.

    If they really wanted to be with it, they would have used something more like anime.