Reassigned and replaced by a man
Pete Hegseth has kicked all the women out of top jobs in the military. Yes all of them.
The Naval Academy was founded in 1845, but didn’t admit its first class of women until 1976. The head of the school is known as the superintendent, and Annapolis would not get its first female admiral in that position until 2024. Now the first woman to serve as the “supe” has been reassigned and replaced by a man, and for the first time in the academy’s history, the role went to a Marine. Last week, the Navy removed Vice Admiral Yvette Davids from her post and replaced her with Lieutenant General Michael Borgschulte.
…
Trump and Hegseth have been on a firing spree throughout the military, especially when it comes to removing women from senior positions. This past winter, the administration fired Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first female chief of naval operations; Admiral Linda Fagan, the first female Coast Guard commandant; and Lieutenant General Jennifer Short, who was serving as the senior military assistant to the secretary of defense, all within weeks of one another. I taught for many years at the U.S. Naval War College, where I worked under its first female president, Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield. In 2023, she became the U.S. military representative to the NATO Military Committee—and then she was fired in April, apparently in part because of a presentation she gave on Women’s Equality Day 10 years ago.
At this point, women have been cleared out of all of the military’s top jobs. They are not likely to be replaced by other women: Of the three dozen four-star officers on active duty in the U.S. armed forces, none is female, and none of the administration’s pending appointments for senior jobs even at the three-star level is a woman.
It’s better that way. Women are inferior.
Discerning this pattern does not exactly require Columbo-level sleuthing. Hegseth’s antipathy toward women in the armed forces was well documented back in 2024 by none other than Hegseth himself. In his book The War on Warriors, Hegseth decried what he believed was “social engineering” by the American left: “While the American people had always rejected the radical-feminist so-called ‘Equal Rights Amendment,’ Team Obama could fast-track their social engineering through the military’s top-down chain of command.”
Women, plus Obama. Can you blame Hegseth for being furious?
As Nora Bensahel, a scholar of civil-military relations at Johns Hopkins University, told me, the firing of Davids and other women “is deliberately sending a chilling message to the women who are already serving in uniform, and to girls who may be thinking about doing so, that they are not welcome—even though the military would not be able to meet its recruiting numbers without those very same women.”
Never mind, all those fired women will have extra babies and soon the recruiting numbers will be back up.

And replacing women from these positions is not social engineering? All and only men is a neutral, apolitical, unprejudiced position? And each of these women has more experience, talent, and skill than a hundred thousand Hegseths and Trumps.
I wonder how this effects the morale of the armed forces as a whole? While I can imagine some Trumpistas among the military, there are going to be plenty who will resent the culling of female officers by a know-nothing dweeb like Hegseth, and I can’t help but think that Trump’s vendetta against diversity in all its forms is not going to help with unit cohesion amongst serving minority members, whose existence is to be ignored and hidden behind their
AryanWhite comrades in arms. Will they be that much less willing to follow illegal orders issued fromBerlinWashington? If those tasked with defending the regime no longer feel they are part of the regime, they might be less inclined to fight for it, die for it, or kill for it. This could become very important.Welll I’m sure it’s all worth it to stick it to the libtards.
YNnB:
But do they have the $$$$$ behind them.?
I can’t help but notice that “White Male” is a special identity group. This is identity politics at it’s basest.